SA Footy

Don't need to comment (unless you want to), just vote anonymously, be interested in the results

I wont reveal what I picked but I voted first.

Lightning McQueen wrote:I wont reveal what I picked but I voted first.

Phew, when I make it 2-nil noone will know

JK wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I wont reveal what I picked but I voted first.

Phew, when I make it 2-nil noone will know

3-0 now!! I'm guessing Boon.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I wont reveal what I picked but I voted first.

Phew, when I make it 2-nil noone will know

3-0 now!! I'm guessing Boon.

I'm going with Amber

I do think the workers should be registered and checked on a regular basis.

I'd rather see blokes go and pay for it when they feel a need opposed to going to nightclubs and picking up unsuspecting drunk girls, or the unspeakable.

JK wrote:
I'm going with Amber

Let me know when and I'll come too.

Lightning McQueen wrote:I do think the workers should be registered and checked on a regular basis.

I'd rather see blokes go and pay for it when they feel a need opposed to going to nightclubs and picking up unsuspecting drunk girls, or the unspeakable.

Add in improved safety conditions for the girls and I completely agree. Understand it's a divisive topic, but have always worried about what could happen to innocent members of the public if some freak can't get their release.

If someone wants to provide that service, and someone is willing to pay for it then i dont see the issue. It's not like they're selling drugs.

You do know that is already legal in SA?

JK wrote:Add in improved safety conditions for the girls and I completely agree. Understand it's a divisive topic, but have always worried about what could happen to innocent members of the public if some freak can't get their release.

Exactly, what I was trying to get at, there's a lot of shit that goes on that we hear very little of, in particular the eastern states, all of these cases are from independent escorts that work from their apartments etc.

It's obviously not something you'd want a family member to engage in but it is the oldest profession in the world apparently and you'd rather it be regulated, even so that convicted sex offenders could be recognised and refused.

DOC wrote:You do know that is already legal in SA?

The laws are very grey.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

DOC wrote:You do know that is already legal in SA?

The laws are very grey.

50 shades of...

Dutchy wrote:50 shades of...

Gotta be a red room.

DOC wrote:You do know that is already legal in SA?

I didn't actually, just presumed from todays court ruling that it was illegal, my bad should have read a bit more.

JK wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:

Lightning McQueen wrote:I wont reveal what I picked but I voted first.

Phew, when I make it 2-nil noone will know

3-0 now!! I'm guessing Boon.

I'm going with Amber

As long as I’m first.

I vote yes so they can pay tax

The Bedge wrote:If someone wants to provide that service, and someone is willing to pay for it then i dont see the issue. It's not like they're selling drugs.

But they sell crack, don't they?

What they are trying to decriminalise is the associated offences, brothels, soliciting in public places, living off anothers earnings etc.

A paid for sex act in a private place that was not solicited in public is legal.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

JK wrote:
I'm going with Amber

Let me know when and I'll come too.