SA Footy

President Assad has deliberately bombed civilians - women and children - and used sarin gas which is a big no, no. The UN is supposed to fix this sort of stuff but its a lame duck organisation. So, US president Obama and his mates are on the verge of launching an all out attack on Syria. I really don't know how I feel about this. If Iran, Russia and China get drawn into it all hell could break loose. Any thoughts?

Team America.

**** yeah.

Are we supposed to believe Syria has WMDs?

Syria has Oil right?

No...leave it to the UN!

helicopterking wrote:Syria has Oil right?

Mmmm, dunno. I don't think that's the issue anyway.

Sky Pilot wrote:

helicopterking wrote:Syria has Oil right?

Mmmm, dunno. I don't think that's the issue anyway.

Iraq all over again.
Syria possessed 2.5 billion barrels of crude oil as of January 2013, which makes it the largest proved reserve of crude oil in the eastern Mediterranean according to the Oil & Gas Journal estimate, besides Iraq.

the world is one big complicated mess- the question is black or white, the answer is grey.
I blame the forces who push for globalisation- the 1% who control 99% of the wealth-types.
We're sheep, and we're all a bunch of f**kin slaves!

Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.

Sky Pilot wrote:

Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.

The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.

Pseudo wrote:

Sky Pilot wrote:

Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.

The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.

What part of bodies without any visible injuries and foaming at the nose and mouth lying on the ground and sarin residue discovered on their clothes and on the ground don't you understand. I agree there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq but here's your evidence as discovered by UN inspectors.

Sky Pilot wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

Sky Pilot wrote:

Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.

The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.

What part of bodies without any visible injuries and foaming at the nose and mouth lying on the ground and sarin residue discovered on their clothes and on the ground don't you understand. I agree there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq but here's your evidence as discovered by UN inspectors.

Yes I did see this. But what if it was a set up. I guess that's why they are delaying. America barely need a reason to take over a country.

helicopterking wrote:
Yes I did see this. But what if it was a set up. I guess that's why they are delaying. America barely need a reason to take over a country.

But what if it wasn't ?

Russian president has since come out and called England "just a small island". Like what Hitler did

I can see if the yanks attack Syria, then Russia will get involved, also china then world war 7 or whatever it is now will happen.

Whats the legal age for a draft to war for Australian troops? I don't want to go overseas and fight someone elses issues but if we were ever invaded then I wouldn't hesitate to fight

I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...

tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...

America want to rule the world

plus a war is great for their economy

With their debt levels, Im not so sure it is great for their economy these days.

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...

America want to rule the world

plus a war is great for their economy

not really great for their economy no, more like MORE crippling debt

and the yanks think they already run the world

tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...

True but in saying that if it is true that there are women and children being gased surely someone has to step in ASAP and stop it. Obviously the UN arent doing that great a job of it so it might as well be the americans.

Maybe it should be up to Syrias buddies like Russia to step in and give them the old 'you cant be doing that'

Sky Pilot wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

Sky Pilot wrote:

Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?

Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.

The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.

The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.

What part of bodies without any visible injuries and foaming at the nose and mouth lying on the ground and sarin residue discovered on their clothes and on the ground don't you understand.

Whoa, cowboy. Just take yer cotton-pickin' finger off the trigger. If and when you have conclusive evidence that Assad et al were responsible, then you can ride yer horse into Dodge and pick off those sand-n*****s like its a gosh-darn turkey shoot. Yee-haw! Gawd bless 'murica!