Page 1 of 1

Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:04 pm
by JAS
Good grief whatever next...to be honest I really do think that anyone who couldn't work out that this contains milk should perhaps be invited to leave the gene pool anyway. It's almost as bad as the famous one on a superman oufit that allegedly said something like 'this outfit will not enable actual flight'

Regards
JAS

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-New ... _Consumers
The makers of Britain's most famous milk chocolate bar have decided to warn their customers that Dairy Milk contains...milk!

Image

Apparently, the name is not enough of warning. Nor is the logo: an image of glass-and-a-half of milk being poured into a chunk of chocolate.

Cadbury Dairy Milk wrappers put milk first in a list of ingredients and explain that there is "the equivalent of three quarters of a pint of fresh liquid milk in every half pound of milk chocolate".

However, Cadbury says it is also necessary to print warnings saying "CONTAINS: MILK" in case people who are allergic to milk do not realise that there is milk in Cadbury Dairy Milk.

The company is printing similar warnings on bars of Cadbury Dairy Milk Whole Nut.

A Cadbury spokesman said the company was complying with the law relating the presence of allergens in food.

But even a support group for people who are allergic to certain foods said Cadbury was going beyond the requirements of the law.

Moira Austin, helpline manager for the Anaphylaxis Campaign said she could understand why people would say Cadbury was "stating the blindingly obvious" or think that the "world had gone mad".

She added: "The law requires manufacturers to list allergens if they are an ingredient. It does not require these additional warnings.

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:51 pm
by bayman
they'll have to use our old adds with professor julius sumner miller over there jas because we all know it is a "glass & a half" of full cream milk ;)

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:59 pm
by JAS
bayman wrote:they'll have to use our old adds with professor julius sumner miller over there jas because we all know it is a "glass & a half" of full cream milk ;)


That's the trouble...I thought we all knew that as well :roll: :lol: They've been saying it since I was a kid. But then again when I was growing up nobody would drop dead because they were in the same room as a peanut :roll:

Regards
JAS

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:09 pm
by Footy Chick
If that was the case, I would have been dead long ago, been into the regionals lately? Plenty of peanuts there.... ;) :lol:

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 8:24 pm
by JAS
=)) :-bd

Nice one FC

Regards
JAS

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:10 pm
by the big bang
Footy Chick wrote:If that was the case, I would have been dead long ago, been into the regionals lately? Plenty of peanuts there.... ;) :lol:



should i be taking offence to this comment FC?

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:08 am
by stan
Footy Chick wrote:If that was the case, I would have been dead long ago, been into the regionals lately? Plenty of peanuts there.... ;) :lol:


Honestly this quote should be framed, its Vintage FC!

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:27 am
by zipzap
Brit Cadbury tastes like soap compared to the Aussie equivalent

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:30 am
by Dirko
Like when they say "This product contains Nuts" and it's a bloody jar of Satay Sauce.....

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:06 pm
by The Yetti
JAS wrote:
bayman wrote:they'll have to use our old adds with professor julius sumner miller over there jas because we all know it is a "glass & a half" of full cream milk ;)


That's the trouble...I thought we all knew that as well :roll: :lol: They've been saying it since I was a kid. But then again when I was growing up nobody would drop dead because they were in the same room as a peanut :roll:

Regards
JAS



JAS,
Sorry to dissappoint you.....our family has a severe allergy to peanuts.
My Cousin cannot walk into a room where peanuts are being eaten.
After a flight back from New Zealand 5 years ago where the person behind ate peanuts, my cousin was hospitalised and very nearly died.

SO YES YOU CAN DROP DEAD IF A PEANUT IS IN THE ROOM

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:09 pm
by Choccies
That'd drive me nuts.......... :shock:

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 3:21 pm
by JK
Keep your Snickers on!!

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:07 pm
by JAS
The Yetti wrote:
JAS wrote:
bayman wrote:they'll have to use our old adds with professor julius sumner miller over there jas because we all know it is a "glass & a half" of full cream milk ;)


That's the trouble...I thought we all knew that as well :roll: :lol: They've been saying it since I was a kid. But then again when I was growing up nobody would drop dead because they were in the same room as a peanut :roll:

Regards
JAS



JAS,
Sorry to dissappoint you.....our family has a severe allergy to peanuts.
My Cousin cannot walk into a room where peanuts are being eaten.
After a flight back from New Zealand 5 years ago where the person behind ate peanuts, my cousin was hospitalised and very nearly died.

SO YES YOU CAN DROP DEAD IF A PEANUT IS IN THE ROOM


Not disappointed at all because I never said that you couldn't drop dead from being in the same room as a peanut. If you read my comment again you'll see I was talking about when I was growning up...I'm just stating a fact...I, and most people I've talked to, never met or heard of anyone with a severe allergy to anything (asthma aside) until recent years...would suggest that either something has happened to food to cause it or to alot of peoples immunes systems (or whatever makes them react...cue Pysber). Either way allergies are now unbelievabley common on a global scale compared to about 40 years ago.

Regards
JAS

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:13 am
by johntheclaret
Or the warning on the steam iron box I read.

"Do not iron clothes on body" :lol:

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:22 pm
by stan
johntheclaret wrote:Or the warning on the steam iron box I read.

"Do not iron clothes on body" :lol:


Ah some good advice there ;)

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:34 pm
by Psyber
I'll take that cue JAS..

It is known that some compounds - like sulphoxyls - will assist other compounds to penetrate our skin and mucous membranes.
My pet theory is increasing use of synthetic organic preservatives, artificial colourings and artificial flavourings [commonly tar derived], fillers and "flavour enhancers" etc.
However, I can't back it up with statistics. The list of what is legally allowed on "food" is daunting.
My wife was told she was "allergic to Penicillins" after a reaction, but turned out to be the azo-dye in the capsule.
Then there are potential carcinogens in sunscreens - benzene compounds, and those in diesel fumes, all of which are probably affecting immune systems.

That's why I try to avoid all of these as much as I can, and live outside the cities - I'm hoping to be around for a while yet.

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:42 pm
by shoe boy
Psyber wrote:I'll take that cue JAS..

It is known that some compounds - like sulphoxyls - will assist other compounds to penetrate our skin and mucous membranes.
My pet theory is increasing use of synthetic organic preservatives, artificial colourings and artificial flavourings [commonly tar derived], fillers and "flavour enhancers" etc.
However, I can't back it up with statistics. The list of what is legally allowed on "food" is daunting.
My wife was told she was "allergic to Penicillins" after a reaction, but turned out to be the azo-dye in the capsule.
Then there are potential carcinogens in sunscreens - benzene compounds, and those in diesel fumes, all of which are probably affecting immune systems.

That's why I try to avoid all of these as much as I can, and live outside the cities - I'm hoping to be around for a while yet.


Mate do you live in a bubble?????

Re: Stating the blindingly obvious

PostPosted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 2:48 pm
by Psyber
shoe boy wrote:
Psyber wrote:I'll take that cue JAS..

It is known that some compounds - like sulphoxyls - will assist other compounds to penetrate our skin and mucous membranes.
My pet theory is increasing use of synthetic organic preservatives, artificial colourings and artificial flavourings [commonly tar derived], fillers and "flavour enhancers" etc.
However, I can't back it up with statistics. The list of what is legally allowed on "food" is daunting.
My wife was told she was "allergic to Penicillins" after a reaction, but turned out to be the azo-dye in the capsule.
Then there are potential carcinogens in sunscreens - benzene compounds, and those in diesel fumes, all of which are probably affecting immune systems.

That's why I try to avoid all of these as much as I can, and live outside the cities - I'm hoping to be around for a while yet.
Mate do you live in a bubble?????
No mate - the cities are in a bubble of muck - have you looked down over one from the hills recently?
I do avoid processed and over chemicalised food as much as I can, but it is not possible to do so totally.
Preservatives are hard to avoid, but are possibly less noxious than some of the other stuff..