Page 1 of 4

Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:24 pm
by smithy
From the Advertiser

A SOUTH Australian father and daughter have revealed they are a couple, and have had a child together.

John and Jenny Deaves reunited 30 years after Mr Deaves separated from Jenny's mother.

Jenny was 31 and just two weeks after meeting, father and daughter had sex.

"John and I are in this relationship as consenting adults," Mrs Deaves told the Nine Network's 60 Minutes tonight.

"We are just asking for a little bit of respect and understanding."

Their nine-month-old daughter Celeste, shown on TV, appears fit and healthy.

Mrs Deaves said soon after reuniting with her father she began to see him as a man first and her father second.

"I was looking at him, sort of going, oh, he's not too bad," she said.

"Like you might look at a man across the bar at a nightclub."

Mrs Deaves brought two children, Samantha and Alex, into the relationship after splitting from her former partner.

Mr Deaves admitted that he "initially" thought having sex with his daughter was wrong.

"Emotions take over, as people no doubt realise, there are times during your life where emotions do rule the heart, it rules the head," he said.

"I knew it was illegal, of course I knew it was illegal but you know, so what."

Mrs Deaves said the physical relationship with her father was like "a sexual relationship with any other man".

For Mr Deaves the sexual relationship was "absolutely fantastic".

A South Australian police media spokesman said "the couple is being monitored"

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:28 pm
by Punk Rooster
Image

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:35 pm
by Dirko
Saw this on 60 minutes tonight...

WRONG, WRONG, WRONG....

Image

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:36 pm
by hearts on fire
im scared :(
i feel sick [-X

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:38 pm
by Punk Rooster
here's the real photo (the other one had been digitally altered)

Image

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:39 pm
by JK
LMAO :lol:

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:40 pm
by JAS
Gross :-&

Had a documentry here last week about brothers and sisters pairing up...I assume after those two that got married without realising they were related...but this had couple who knowingly got together didn't watch it but from the ads I think most were half brothers and half sisters)...so wrong...but somehow father and daughter is soooooo much worse.

Regards
JAS

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:43 pm
by Punk Rooster
the other states will have a field day with this.
Tasmanians are laughing nervously, perhaps indignant they wouldn't stoop that low.
What will the baby call the man- dad or grandpa? or Dadpa?
which caravan park are the happy couple living in?

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:03 pm
by devilsadvocate
Punk Rooster wrote:What will the baby call the man- dad or grandpa? or Dadpa?

:lol: :lol: =D>

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:05 pm
by Dirko
JAS wrote:Gross :-&

Had a documentry here last week about brothers and sisters pairing up...I assume after those two that got married without realising they were related...but this had couple who knowingly got together didn't watch it but from the ads I think most were half brothers and half sisters)...so wrong...but somehow father and daughter is soooooo much worse.

Regards
JAS



60 minutes covered that too... [-X [-X

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:38 pm
by zipzap
I saw The Other Boleyn Girl last night, in which our heroine Anne gets her head chopped off for (very nearly) shagging her brother. Ewwwww....this is much worse! :vom:

Why does this remind me of that quote from the Club?

"He's been up his mum and his legless sister and he thinks he killed his old man!"

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:41 am
by therisingblues
I feel sorry for the baby. What sort of life is she going to lead with this background.

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:48 am
by johntheclaret
Punk Rooster wrote:here's the real photo (the other one had been digitally altered)

Image


LMAO :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dad was a Woodville fan, Daughter barracked for West Torrens. Can't think who the baby will follow when she gets older :wink:

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:20 am
by Dogwatcher
Read about this three weeks ago.
The Border Watch article, although fairly serious, was very funny to read.

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:28 am
by Punk Rooster
therisingblues wrote:I feel sorry for the baby. What sort of life is she going to lead with this background.

emo.

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:10 am
by mal
Father f.cker...

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:35 am
by The Big Shrek
therisingblues wrote:I feel sorry for the baby. What sort of life is she going to lead with this background.


One less grandparent to get presents from at christmas.

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:48 am
by MightyEagles
johntheclaret wrote:
Punk Rooster wrote:here's the real photo (the other one had been digitally altered)

Image


LMAO :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dad was a Woodville fan, Daughter barracked for West Torrens. Can't think who the baby will follow when she gets older :wink:


Nah, one went for Port, the other Collingwood. :wink: :lol:

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:26 am
by Baron Greenback
Sick....

Re: Keeping it in the family

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:37 am
by Punk Rooster
brings new meaning to Daddy's little girl.... :vom: :vom: :vom:

actually, with this level of in-breeding, maybe this is the start of our own Royal Family...