by The Apostle » Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:35 am
by The Apostle » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:02 am
by The Apostle » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:04 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:27 am
by another grub » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:52 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Thu Aug 11, 2011 9:59 am
JAS wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:forget water bombs get the real bastards out!!
How is solihull? Is this an area bein affected at all?
I don't think I've heard any mention of Solihull on the BBC or Sky news channels which is my main tv source but I just did a quick search for you and found this...
http://www.solihullobserver.co.uk/index.html
I assume you have connections so the local paper might be a good way to keep an eye on things. I can let you know if I do hear anything elsewhere if you like.
Regards
JAS
by The Apostle » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:09 am
by CENTURION » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:11 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Stop Press: The riots have spread to Scotland...
by another grub » Thu Aug 11, 2011 10:19 am
by Magpiespower » Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:26 am
by Dogwatcher » Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:09 pm
by Q. » Thu Aug 11, 2011 2:41 pm
by Bat Pad » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:44 pm
Quichey wrote:People feel like they’ve got a stake through their heart
The short answer to the Right’s self-serving construction of these events would be to say that they are easily falsified by looking at where and when they don’t and didn’t happen. The first and obvious candidate is Scotland — these aren’t British riots, they’re English riots. Why? Because Scotland and Northern Ireland are separately governed for the purposes of domestic spending, and in both cases, the Tories’ cuts have been resisted. People still have a stake in society and riots when they occur have an older political form i.e. sectarianism.
Furthermore when you look to the places where “PC” parenting, policing blah blah has occurred — i.e. Scandinavia, Netherlands etc — you find not merely an absence of riots, but also an absence of the sort of anomie that fuels Britain. Why? Because they’re less unequal places. People still feel they’ve got a stake in their own lives.
In England, people feel like they’ve got a stake through their heart. They didn’t for a while under Labour, as Gordon Brown began to wheel out some sort of social investment state — now that’s been wound up, there is simply a renewed sense of radical isolation.
The form the riots are taking may well be dictated by the nature of postmodern society — the content is still dictated by politics. The Right’s half-arsed theorising on this wont disguise the truth — these are Thatcher’s children, and this is Thatcher’s England, still and again, and in its third decade.
by Q. » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:47 pm
by Bat Pad » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:50 pm
Quichey wrote:The Scotland videos were jokes.
There's always an underlying cause. If you don't address the root of the cause, history will only repeat itself.
by JK » Thu Aug 11, 2011 3:56 pm
by Q. » Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:00 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Quichey wrote:The Scotland videos were jokes.
There's always an underlying cause. If you don't address the root of the cause, history will only repeat itself.
I agree, but that doesn't mean the underlying cause is always a good excuse.
by JAS » Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:21 pm
Bat Pad wrote:Quichey wrote:People feel like they’ve got a stake through their heart
The short answer to the Right’s self-serving construction of these events would be to say that they are easily falsified by looking at where and when they don’t and didn’t happen. The first and obvious candidate is Scotland — these aren’t British riots, they’re English riots. Why? Because Scotland and Northern Ireland are separately governed for the purposes of domestic spending, and in both cases, the Tories’ cuts have been resisted. People still have a stake in society and riots when they occur have an older political form i.e. sectarianism.
Furthermore when you look to the places where “PC” parenting, policing blah blah has occurred — i.e. Scandinavia, Netherlands etc — you find not merely an absence of riots, but also an absence of the sort of anomie that fuels Britain. Why? Because they’re less unequal places. People still feel they’ve got a stake in their own lives.
In England, people feel like they’ve got a stake through their heart. They didn’t for a while under Labour, as Gordon Brown began to wheel out some sort of social investment state — now that’s been wound up, there is simply a renewed sense of radical isolation.
The form the riots are taking may well be dictated by the nature of postmodern society — the content is still dictated by politics. The Right’s half-arsed theorising on this wont disguise the truth — these are Thatcher’s children, and this is Thatcher’s England, still and again, and in its third decade.
I thought there were riots in Scotland, at least according to 3 or 4 posts above. Did this not occur (honestly don't know)
Top marks for courage on quoting Scandinavia considering a scandanavian mowed down 85 strangers less than a month ago.
Netherlands etc.- They can't seriously be refering to France can they? Or Belgium where a person stabbed to death a bunch of pre schoolers 2 years ago?
Don't understand why some writers dont just accept that some people are just jerks. There is no underlying cause, except for the fact that they are a jerk.
No, it's not Magaret Thatcher's fault. These people are just jerks. And when jerks think they can get away with being a jerk because everyone else is doing it, guess what. They are gonna act like a jerk.
by JAS » Thu Aug 11, 2011 8:15 pm
Scotland Yard said two 17-year-olds and an 18-year-old had been arrested in connection with violent disorder and the arson at the warehouse. Two remain in custody while a 17-year-old has been bailed.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |