7-Dog wrote:In the article I read, 32 people shot. A professionally trained elite gunmen kill:wound ratio in a confined space would be 1:5, Martin Bryant's was 1.66:1
http://www.whale.to/b/viallspam.html
If you read that article with the same scepticism that the author uses on the official version you can find holes in his version too.
After he starts with this "governments and intelligence agencies have been known to prey on and use simple and sometimes ill people to massacre innocent victims in order to gain greater control of the masses" I find it hard to take seriously. Then he finishes up with:
"Directly linked to this was a massive funded campaign to disarm the Australian people in spite of significant external threats to our national security. If this was indeed the motive, Australia and its people have been violated in the worst possible way by sworn enemies of our great nation, with likely long term consequences too awesome to contemplate."
Why does every conspiracy theorist finish an article with an sensationalistic and alarmist statement like this?
