HH3 wrote:Spargo wrote:Booney wrote:In reality we wouldn't want Australian workers being paid $3 and hour to risk their lives running dilapidated machinery to make sub standard products
Spot on. Without unions, this would be the norm.
Unions are to blame for Holdens. I know of guys that were on a broom most of their shift earning $60k+ by the time they got made redundant. That's all on the unions.
They fought for pay increases, got them, then fought again for higher pay increases.
I know of people that were on ridiculous money, thought they had job security and racked up huge mortgages and car loans, only to price themselves out of their own jobs, and lost it all.
Now they're 35 living with their parents, trying to pay back what's left of the finance they couldn't recoup by selling their shit off.
I disagree, Holdens are to blame for Holdens, then trade agreements, then Unions.
General Motors were 20 years behind European ( and some Asian ) car manufacturers, they ( GM ) thought we'd all be driving the Aussie dream V8 for ever, at least they were still thinking that in the 1990's. Come the turn of the century the Cruze was going to be the saviour, but it was all too late.
When the consumer got wise to the world and the cost of living a $40,000 Commodore with 3.6lt V6 became a luxury item, not the first choice for car buyers. GM didn't move with the times.
Trade agreements made it easier for the consumer to buy little Miss a Hyundai Excel in 1997 for next to nothing and run it on $15 bucks a week. The consumer wasn't worried about the longevity of the car, pricing meant 5 years was long enough out of a heap of shit and on we move.
Perhaps, it could be argued, the unions put a nail in the coffin but the casket maker was knocking up some bits of plywood back before the Sydney Olympics.
PAFC. Forever.
LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!