They are hilarious. The athlete had me in stitches.
by Bum Crack » Mon May 07, 2012 9:02 am
by Brodlach » Mon May 07, 2012 9:18 am
Richmond are typically our bitches, they have not improved for 5 or more years and I expect to account for this bunch of also-rans this Sunday.
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by Booney » Mon May 07, 2012 9:44 am
by Pseudo » Mon May 07, 2012 10:22 am
zipzap wrote:
Funny how things go round these days - was just about to post this, after thinking it would appeal to you Pseudo
by heater31 » Mon May 07, 2012 11:30 am
Pseudo wrote:zipzap wrote:
Funny how things go round these days - was just about to post this, after thinking it would appeal to you Pseudo
^ a thing that made me laugh![]()
Either you know my sense of humour, or we both have closeted metrosexual tendencies
by Rik E Boy » Mon May 07, 2012 11:34 am
Brodlach wrote:Richmond are typically our bitches, they have not improved for 5 or more years and I expect to account for this bunch of also-rans this Sunday.
This comment by Booney from the Power thread. If they are your bitches, how bad are the Power after yesterdays effort (or non effort)
by zipzap » Mon May 07, 2012 1:12 pm
Pseudo wrote:zipzap wrote:
Funny how things go round these days - was just about to post this, after thinking it would appeal to you Pseudo
^ a thing that made me laugh![]()
Either you know my sense of humour, or we both have closeted metrosexual tendencies
by Pottsy » Mon May 07, 2012 1:21 pm
by Footy Chick » Mon May 07, 2012 2:22 pm
by Booney » Mon May 07, 2012 3:13 pm
Footy Chick wrote:A girl that sits next to me at work said that the above is possibly the funniest thing she's ever read - rivalling such works as David Thornes Missing cat email...
by OnSong » Mon May 07, 2012 3:56 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Brodlach wrote:Richmond are typically our bitches, they have not improved for 5 or more years and I expect to account for this bunch of also-rans this Sunday.
This comment by Booney from the Power thread. If they are your bitches, how bad are the Power after yesterdays effort (or non effort)
LMAO I just put a reference to that in the 'things I rate' thread. Quality work ha ha.
regards,
REB
by Psyber » Tue May 08, 2012 12:05 pm
In all they may have emitted a total of 520 million tons (520 Tg) per year of global methane emissions, a level that is comparable to the total given off today by animals and industrial activities, the study authors said.
Currently 80 million metric tons of methane are produced annually by global livestock, making up about 28 percent of global methane emissions from human-related activities according to the US Environmental Protection Agency.
"A simple mathematical model suggests that the microbes living in sauropod dinosaurs may have produced enough methane to have an important effect on the Mesozoic climate," said Dave Wilkinson of Liverpool John Moores University. "Indeed, our calculations suggest that these dinosaurs could have produced more methane than all modern sources -- both natural and man-made -- put together."
About 150 years ago, before modern industry took hold, methane emissions were about 200 Tg per year, less than half that of the Mesozoic Era.
by fish » Thu May 10, 2012 9:56 pm
Thankfully matches weren't invented back then...Psyber wrote:An amusing sideline on the Global Warming issue - Dinosaur farting...
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu May 10, 2012 10:13 pm
by gossipgirl » Fri May 11, 2012 9:28 am
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Apparently they are. Think about it.
by fish » Sat May 12, 2012 12:06 am
TSG I assume you are joking.The Sleeping Giant wrote:Apparently they are. Think about it.
by Pseudo » Sat May 12, 2012 3:04 pm
by fish » Sat May 12, 2012 5:29 pm
Ah now I get it - very funny.Pseudo wrote:Two words for you fishy:
FOSSIL FUEL
keep thinking....
by GWW » Mon May 14, 2012 8:19 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |