Kate topless

Anything!

Re: Kate topless

Postby fisho mcspaz » Wed Sep 19, 2012 7:51 pm

Jimmy_041 wrote:
fisho mcspaz wrote:You know whose arse I really don't like, though? I mean an arse that keeps getting its own headlines and such, so evidently people think it's fair awesome - Kim Kardashian's. Or maybe it's just that I don't like what it's attached to. Anyway, every time I see it, I just think of that person in Florida who got sued for injecting concrete and bits of rubber tyres or something into people's arses. Hers looks as solid as a bloody rock. I think it was Bridget Jones' Diary where someone said 'Men want a bottom you can park a bicycle in' - well, I wouldn't want to park my bike in there even if I had a bike, because I'd probably never get it back.


:lol: You crack me up Fisho

You sure you're not a bloke....


I'm sure. If I seem like a bloke it's probably because my dad always wanted a son but there was only me and my sister, and so I was sort of the substitute boy and went to the footy with him and went camping and fishing and hiking and all that stuff. I was never given the pink frilly bedroom or any of that as a kid. Plus until I was ten my mum cut my hair just like Grug so most people probably thought I was a boy anyway, and maybe all of that's carried over into my adulthood. :? :lol:
Hey Goose, ya big stud! Take me to bed or lose me for ever.
User avatar
fisho mcspaz
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3042
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Happy Valley
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 111 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Kate topless

Postby southee » Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:04 pm

scoob wrote:
fisho mcspaz wrote:You know whose arse I really don't like, though? I mean an arse that keeps getting its own headlines and such, so evidently people think it's fair awesome - Kim Kardashian's. Or maybe it's just that I don't like what it's attached to. Anyway, every time I see it, I just think of that person in Florida who got sued for injecting concrete and bits of rubber tyres or something into people's arses. Hers looks as solid as a bloody rock. I think it was Bridget Jones' Diary where someone said 'Men want a bottom you can park a bicycle in' - well, I wouldn't want to park my bike in there even if I had a bike, because I'd probably never get it back.


I agree! Give me Pippa's any day of the week!


Either or .... Not fussy ;)
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby Gozu » Thu Sep 20, 2012 4:04 pm

Her tits are a fair bit smaller than that and fake tits are shit anyway.
"The factory of the future will have only two employees, a man and a dog. The man will be there to feed the dog. The dog will be there to keep the man from touching the equipment" – Warren Bennis
User avatar
Gozu
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13814
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 am
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 678 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby fisho mcspaz » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:43 pm

Gozu wrote:Her tits are a fair bit smaller than that and fake tits are shit anyway.


I agree! Fake tits are just like chicken fillets. Same consistency anyway.
Hey Goose, ya big stud! Take me to bed or lose me for ever.
User avatar
fisho mcspaz
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3042
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 5:33 pm
Location: Happy Valley
Has liked: 84 times
Been liked: 111 times
Grassroots Team: Mitchell Park

Re: Kate topless

Postby Dog_ger » Thu Sep 20, 2012 5:57 pm

Her Boobs are Beautiful :partyman:
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby Psyber » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:01 pm

Ho Hum.
What really matters is invasion of privacy.
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 404 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Kate topless

Postby Sky Pilot » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:14 pm

Psyber wrote:Ho Hum.
What really matters is invasion of privacy.

You know what is being overlooked here? If a photographer with a 1200mm Canon lense can snap her picture unhindered as it seems, what could an assasin do with a serious scoped-up sniper rifle? Her security people should be hauled over the coals and fired. Poor choice of words there. Hauled over the coals and retrenched.
People who bought this book also bought a stool and some rope. Unknown literary critic
User avatar
Sky Pilot
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Stone Hut Bakery
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: BMW

Re: Kate topless

Postby Hondo » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:36 pm

Sky Pilot wrote:You know what is being overlooked here? If a photographer with a 1200mm Canon lense can snap her picture unhindered as it seems, what could an assasin do with a serious scoped-up sniper rifle? Her security people should be hauled over the coals and fired. Poor choice of words there. Hauled over the coals and retrenched.


You are assuming that someone carrying a "serous scoped-up snifer rifle" would have got as close as someone carrying a camera with a zoom lense, however close the person with the camera got.

I reckon one would draw more attention to themselves (and therefore to the security) than the other.
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby Sky Pilot » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:39 pm

Hondo wrote:
Sky Pilot wrote:You know what is being overlooked here? If a photographer with a 1200mm Canon lense can snap her picture unhindered as it seems, what could an assasin do with a serious scoped-up sniper rifle? Her security people should be hauled over the coals and fired. Poor choice of words there. Hauled over the coals and retrenched.


You are assuming that someone carrying a "serous scoped-up snifer rifle" would have got as close as someone carrying a camera with a zoom lense, however close the person with the camera got.

I reckon one would draw more attention to themselves (and therefore to the security) than the other.

Not if you carried the camera for all to see but had the rifle dismantled and concealed upon your person huh? James Bond could do this in a snip.
People who bought this book also bought a stool and some rope. Unknown literary critic
User avatar
Sky Pilot
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Stone Hut Bakery
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: BMW

Re: Kate topless

Postby Dog_ger » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:42 pm

Psyber wrote:Ho Hum.
What really matters is invasion of privacy.


Define Privacy... :shock:

Behind closed doors or out in the open.. ;)
Smile :)

It's only Money $$$ :)

What is happening to our SANFL guys...
User avatar
Dog_ger
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6536
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:25 pm
Location: Salisbury Downs
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 19 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby Hondo » Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:45 pm

Sky Pilot wrote:Not if you carried the camera for all to see but had the rifle dismantled and concealed upon your person huh? James Bond could do this in a snip.


Well a sniper needs to set up, settle, aim, shoot and then exit without being noticed after firing. Somewhere in this hypothetical process I think the security perimeter would get alerted. But, yes, I guess James Bond could do it :)
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby the big bang » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:24 pm

Hondo wrote:
Sky Pilot wrote:Not if you carried the camera for all to see but had the rifle dismantled and concealed upon your person huh? James Bond could do this in a snip.


Well a sniper needs to set up, settle, aim, shoot and then exit without being noticed after firing. Somewhere in this hypothetical process I think the security perimeter would get alerted. But, yes, I guess James Bond could do it :)



Lee Harvey Oswald says Hi
wuuuzzzzz
User avatar
the big bang
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 3194
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 2:48 pm
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 9 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby gadj1976 » Thu Sep 20, 2012 8:55 pm

Sky Pilot wrote:
Psyber wrote:Ho Hum.
What really matters is invasion of privacy.

You know what is being overlooked here? If a photographer with a 1200mm Canon lense can snap her picture unhindered as it seems, what could an assasin do with a serious scoped-up sniper rifle? Her security people should be hauled over the coals and fired. Poor choice of words there. Hauled over the coals and retrenched.


When I heard of the distance the photos were taken, I wondered the same thing.
User avatar
gadj1976
Coach
 
 
Posts: 9304
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:57 pm
Location: Sleeping on a park bench outside Princes Park
Has liked: 812 times
Been liked: 882 times

Kate topless

Postby RustyCage » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:02 pm

Instead of the royals being annoyed at the magazine or photographer, maybe they should have a word to Kate for getting her top off somewhere she can be seen
I'm gonna break my rusty cage and run
User avatar
RustyCage
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 15302
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Adelaide
Has liked: 1269 times
Been liked: 937 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby smac » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:11 pm

pafc1870 wrote:Instead of the royals being annoyed at the magazine or photographer, maybe they should have a word to Kate for getting her top off somewhere she can be seen

I found it amusing that Bingle was a whore for nuding up in her home while outdoor Kate was a victim.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Kate topless

Postby southee » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:17 pm

smac wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:Instead of the royals being annoyed at the magazine or photographer, maybe they should have a word to Kate for getting her top off somewhere she can be seen

I found it amusing that Bingle was a whore for nuding up in her home while outdoor Kate was a victim.


You think Lara Bingle did not know the Paparazzi where there??

She would of bloody called them!!!!! :lol:

Complete set up by the media as her crap show was about to be launched.
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby Sky Pilot » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:18 pm

gadj1976 wrote:
Sky Pilot wrote:
Psyber wrote:Ho Hum.
What really matters is invasion of privacy.

You know what is being overlooked here? If a photographer with a 1200mm Canon lense can snap her picture unhindered as it seems, what could an assasin do with a serious scoped-up sniper rifle? Her security people should be hauled over the coals and fired. Poor choice of words there. Hauled over the coals and retrenched.


When I heard of the distance the photos were taken, I wondered the same thing.

Thank God for that. I was beginning to wonder if I was rooly, rooly stupid
People who bought this book also bought a stool and some rope. Unknown literary critic
User avatar
Sky Pilot
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4390
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:39 pm
Location: Stone Hut Bakery
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 3 times
Grassroots Team: BMW

Re: Kate topless

Postby smac » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:07 pm

southee wrote:
smac wrote:
pafc1870 wrote:Instead of the royals being annoyed at the magazine or photographer, maybe they should have a word to Kate for getting her top off somewhere she can be seen

I found it amusing that Bingle was a whore for nuding up in her home while outdoor Kate was a victim.


You think Lara Bingle did not know the Paparazzi where there??

She would of bloody called them!!!!! :lol:

Complete set up by the media as her crap show was about to be launched.

Of course she knew!

Kate thought she was alone? Pigs arse!
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13089
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 165 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Kate topless

Postby Hondo » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:33 pm

the big bang wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald says Hi


OK, I'll open my mind to this scenario.

So someone educate me. How far away were the photos taken (1 km?) and what sort of rifle do you need to reach that far?
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Kate topless

Postby JK » Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:07 pm

fisho mcspaz wrote:I think it was Bridget Jones' Diary where someone said 'Men want a bottom you can park a bicycle in' - well, I wouldn't want to park my bike in there even if I had a bike, because I'd probably never get it back.


That sounds like something from The 40 Year Old Virgin too!

KELLY CLARKSON!!!

Image
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37459
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3022 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

PreviousNext

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |