by 7-Dog » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:29 pm
by Hondo » Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:46 pm
Bat Pad wrote:The bullet passes through the head too easily in the entry wound, therefore not creating the forward movement through momentum. But the exit wound is far more violent, and creates a release of gas (and therefore energy) in the opposite direction to where the bullet came from, therefore causing the head to move back towards where the bullet came from. Type in Penn and Teller and watermelon in youtube and it shows this (I think its Penn & Teller).
by The Apostle » Thu Nov 25, 2010 9:39 pm
Bat Pad wrote:The bullet passes through the head too easily in the entry wound, therefore not creating the forward movement through momentum. But the exit wound is far more violent, and creates a release of gas (and therefore energy) in the opposite direction to where the bullet came from, therefore causing the head to move back towards where the bullet came from.
by Hondo » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:01 pm
by The Apostle » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:36 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle wrote:The Warren Commission estimated that President Kennedy was 176.9 feet (53.9 m) to 190.8 feet (58.2 m) from the sixth floor corner window of the Depository when he was shot in the neck, and 265.3 feet (80.9 m) when he was shot in the head.
by The Apostle » Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:44 pm
Hondo wrote:He seemed to be sitting forward with his wife cradling him
by Squawk » Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Hondo wrote:On a fresh look at the Zapruder film and I have to admit there is some sort of blow out in the front of his head first and then the backwards motion could be that of a lifeless body rather than the force of a bullet. He seemed to be sitting forward with his wife cradling him after seemingly being shot through the neck and then it's possible that he just slumped back lifeless.
by 7-Dog » Fri Nov 26, 2010 12:35 am
Squawk wrote:Hondo wrote:On a fresh look at the Zapruder film and I have to admit there is some sort of blow out in the front of his head first and then the backwards motion could be that of a lifeless body rather than the force of a bullet. He seemed to be sitting forward with his wife cradling him after seemingly being shot through the neck and then it's possible that he just slumped back lifeless.
It could also be that the acceleration of the vehicle thrust his head backwards...?
There should be a poll with this - which conspiracy theory to you think is the most plausible?
Oswald did do it
Oswald was a patsy
The Mafia did it
Castro was behind it
Other....
by Mr66 » Fri Nov 26, 2010 4:49 pm
7-Dog wrote:3 of the biggest events that have occurred in the United States, have all lead to war.
Pearl Harbor, JFK & 9/11
by 7-Dog » Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:46 pm
Mr66 wrote:7-Dog wrote:3 of the biggest events that have occurred in the United States, have all lead to war.
Pearl Harbor, JFK & 9/11
er...dunno about that
WW2 was already going before the States came off the bench after 7/12/41.
9/11 was spot on but JFK killing is a bit of a stretch.
The US was already in Vietnam when he was shot
by ORDoubleBlues » Sun Nov 28, 2010 6:00 pm
by Gozu » Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:16 am
by Footy Chick » Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:34 am
Gatt_Weasel wrote:if they (Walkerville) dont win the flag ill run around the block of my street naked :) you can grab a chair and enjoy the view
by Hondo » Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:34 am
ORDoubleBlues wrote:As far as the ex of your's Hondo, there are some people who will only accept the official version of things no matter how ridiculous the evidence as it affects their own personal "security" and there's certainly been situations in the past where the official version of the time was later admitted to be false. Will admit that Stone does appear to stretch things a bit but as he admits himself, some of the scenes in his movie are based on what 'may have happened' as no one will ever no now what actually went on behind closed doors.
by Barto » Fri Dec 03, 2010 12:11 am
The Apostle AK wrote:Bat Pad wrote:The bullet passes through the head too easily in the entry wound, therefore not creating the forward movement through momentum. But the exit wound is far more violent, and creates a release of gas (and therefore energy) in the opposite direction to where the bullet came from, therefore causing the head to move back towards where the bullet came from.
Exactly!
Watch a decent copy of the Zapruder film you can clearly see the FRONT TOP RIGHT area of JFK's head getting blown out.
Here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-cri43ttTo
by ORDoubleBlues » Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:48 pm
Hondo wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:As far as the ex of your's Hondo, there are some people who will only accept the official version of things no matter how ridiculous the evidence as it affects their own personal "security" and there's certainly been situations in the past where the official version of the time was later admitted to be false. Will admit that Stone does appear to stretch things a bit but as he admits himself, some of the scenes in his movie are based on what 'may have happened' as no one will ever no now what actually went on behind closed doors.
She wasn't supporting the Warren Commission's findings or the official version of events. I'm not sure what her opinion on the JFK assassination was.
Having experience in the industry, she was just warning me about Oliver Stone and his own motivations and so to keep an open mind on his version of the events.
by JAS » Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:35 pm
by 7-Dog » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:12 pm
by Hondo » Mon Dec 06, 2010 5:08 pm
by 7-Dog » Mon Dec 06, 2010 7:02 pm
Hondo wrote:I have heard some of the Bryant conspiracy theories and find them farcical! I think the theory is that it was a govt conspiracy to bring about a change in the gun control laws. I read he was either brainwashed or didn't act alone. I have also heard that govt sharp shooters did it all and Bryant was put up as the patsy.
The recent headline was that Bryant's mother said he wasn't smart enough to plan the massacre. How smart do you have to be to walk around a tourist destination with a semi-automatic weapon with no-one having a gun to defend themselves?
Sorry, I just can't accept it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |