by saintal » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:42 pm
by redandblack » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:46 pm
by fish » Wed Nov 17, 2010 10:58 pm
by Psyber » Thu Nov 18, 2010 10:38 am
And raises, in some sections of the community, concerns about the validity and composition of the High Court?redandblack wrote:Ruddock, certainly one of the worst ministers ever to hold office, wouldn't know if his arse was on fire and misses the point of this decision completely.
This decision by the High Court blows away some of the nastier misconceptions about the legality of asylum seekers.
by fish » Thu Nov 18, 2010 8:38 pm
by Squawk » Thu Nov 18, 2010 9:01 pm
fish wrote:More good news from this weeks Hills Courier:
http://thecouriernews.blogspot.com/2010/11/schools-would-welcome-asylum-seeker.html
Schools would welcome asylum seeker children
Fifteen schools within the Hills have expressed an interest in teaching children from the proposed detention centre at Inverbrackie.
It has not yet been confirmed whether the students will be educated in an on-site facility or if they will attend neighboring schools when they start school next year.
The Education Department has been approached by schools across the district indicating their willingness to host the children.
John Balnaves, principal of the Woodside Primary School, said he had spoken with the department's regional director, the school's governing council and staff about having the children at the school.
Looks like the schools are showing the positive attitude and generosity of spirit that is sadly lacking in the wider community of Woodside.
by saintal » Fri Nov 19, 2010 8:42 am
Squawk wrote:fish wrote:More good news from this weeks Hills Courier:
http://thecouriernews.blogspot.com/2010/11/schools-would-welcome-asylum-seeker.html
Schools would welcome asylum seeker children
Fifteen schools within the Hills have expressed an interest in teaching children from the proposed detention centre at Inverbrackie.
It has not yet been confirmed whether the students will be educated in an on-site facility or if they will attend neighboring schools when they start school next year.
The Education Department has been approached by schools across the district indicating their willingness to host the children.
John Balnaves, principal of the Woodside Primary School, said he had spoken with the department's regional director, the school's governing council and staff about having the children at the school.
Looks like the schools are showing the positive attitude and generosity of spirit that is sadly lacking in the wider community of Woodside.
More students = more govt funds and resources, fish. They will be looking to get coin from the Cwlth and State govts to take them on, and this is a quick and easy way to draw more revenue in.
Ironically, Bellevue Heights Primary School has a specialty in educating refugees yet the state govt has cut school bus subsidies so many who travel some distance to attend that school are now left in limbo.
by Squawk » Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:14 am
by fish » Fri Nov 19, 2010 11:04 pm
Well you guys sure have a negative view of life these dayssaintal wrote:Squawk wrote:fish wrote:More good news from this weeks Hills Courier:
http://thecouriernews.blogspot.com/2010/11/schools-would-welcome-asylum-seeker.html
Schools would welcome asylum seeker children
Fifteen schools within the Hills have expressed an interest in teaching children from the proposed detention centre at Inverbrackie.
It has not yet been confirmed whether the students will be educated in an on-site facility or if they will attend neighboring schools when they start school next year.
The Education Department has been approached by schools across the district indicating their willingness to host the children.
John Balnaves, principal of the Woodside Primary School, said he had spoken with the department's regional director, the school's governing council and staff about having the children at the school.
Looks like the schools are showing the positive attitude and generosity of spirit that is sadly lacking in the wider community of Woodside.
More students = more govt funds and resources, fish. They will be looking to get coin from the Cwlth and State govts to take them on, and this is a quick and easy way to draw more revenue in.
Ironically, Bellevue Heights Primary School has a specialty in educating refugees yet the state govt has cut school bus subsidies so many who travel some distance to attend that school are now left in limbo.
Have to once again agree with Squawk on this one. Schools will be thinking “What can we get out of this?” and most will welcome the influx of funds and infrastructure. A lot of Hills schools will be feeling the pinch in 2011 due to cuts in grants etc. Whilst Woodside PS is basically at capacity, other schools in the neighbouring area could probably use a few extra classes. (Oakbank AS comes to mind)
by fish » Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:24 am
by redden whites » Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:20 am
by fish » Thu Nov 25, 2010 5:53 pm
by fish » Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:27 pm
by Rik E Boy » Mon Dec 06, 2010 4:51 pm
fish wrote:The article also reports that the leaflet says:
No Australian should communicate with any so called refugee.![]()
No Australian should attend any church or group that supports the invasion.
by Dutchy » Mon Dec 06, 2010 9:28 pm
by Psyber » Wed Dec 08, 2010 10:32 am
Obviously meaningful as none of them live anywhere near Woodside. I wonder how they feel if it were to be at Glen Alta or Blackwood Park?Dutchy wrote:Was at the Blackwood pagent last Friday night and there was a float in support of inverbrackie and welcoming the refugees
by fish » Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:35 am
Psyber wrote:Obviously meaningful as none of them live anywhere near Woodside. I wonder how they feel if it were to be at Glen Alta or Blackwood Park?Dutchy wrote:Was at the Blackwood pagent last Friday night and there was a float in support of inverbrackie and welcoming the refugees
by Psyber » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:30 am
fish wrote:What a terrible insult to the brave and warm-hearted people who openly support refugees in this town.Psyber wrote:Obviously meaningful as none of them live anywhere near Woodside. I wonder how they feel if it were to be at Glen Alta or Blackwood Park?Dutchy wrote:Was at the Blackwood pagent last Friday night and there was a float in support of inverbrackie and welcoming the refugees![]()
I know many people who support refugees through the Circle of Friends (refugee support group) and Amnesty International and these people have not only travelled far and wide to assist those in detention but have put refugees up in their own homes for extended periods in order to assist their transition into the community. They are far from the NIMBY's that your comment implies them to be.
The real NIMBY's are the cold-hearted and selfish people of Woodside - not all of them but many of them. Psyber if you are looking at people to put down for being NIMBY's I suggest you start there.
by saintal » Thu Dec 09, 2010 11:50 am
Psyber wrote:fish wrote:What a terrible insult to the brave and warm-hearted people who openly support refugees in this town.Psyber wrote:Obviously meaningful as none of them live anywhere near Woodside. I wonder how they feel if it were to be at Glen Alta or Blackwood Park?Dutchy wrote:Was at the Blackwood pagent last Friday night and there was a float in support of inverbrackie and welcoming the refugees![]()
I know many people who support refugees through the Circle of Friends (refugee support group) and Amnesty International and these people have not only travelled far and wide to assist those in detention but have put refugees up in their own homes for extended periods in order to assist their transition into the community. They are far from the NIMBY's that your comment implies them to be.
The real NIMBY's are the cold-hearted and selfish people of Woodside - not all of them but many of them. Psyber if you are looking at people to put down for being NIMBY's I suggest you start there.
I'm inclined to see it as a local issue for local people, who need time for discussion and consultation and to be satisfied and reconciled that it is a good solution.
Those who campaign to make other people embrace their views, and abuse them if they don't rush to do so without adequate debate and consideration, have only my contempt for there anti-democratic attempt to impose their world view on all.
by fish » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:42 pm
Psyber wrote:Those who campaign to make other people embrace their views, and abuse them if they don't rush to do so without adequate debate and consideration, have only my contempt for there anti-democratic attempt to impose their world view on all.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |