by RB » Mon Jun 20, 2022 12:04 pm
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:03 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:15 pm
RB wrote:So by 'coercion' you mean employment condition?
I assume by the same token you regard the requirement to wear hard hats on construction sites as 'coercion'.
by Booney » Mon Jun 20, 2022 1:50 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:So by 'coercion' you mean employment condition?
I assume by the same token you regard the requirement to wear hard hats on construction sites as 'coercion'.
If they misrepresented the reasons why you have to wear a hard hat as part of your job then you may have a point
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:08 pm
Booney wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:So by 'coercion' you mean employment condition?
I assume by the same token you regard the requirement to wear hard hats on construction sites as 'coercion'.
If they misrepresented the reasons why you have to wear a hard hat as part of your job then you may have a point
Say, like, as protection against a concrete slab falling on you?
by Booney » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:15 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:Booney wrote:Jimmy_041 wrote:RB wrote:So by 'coercion' you mean employment condition?
I assume by the same token you regard the requirement to wear hard hats on construction sites as 'coercion'.
If they misrepresented the reasons why you have to wear a hard hat as part of your job then you may have a point
Say, like, as protection against a concrete slab falling on you?
Nailed it
"Here RB - under your employment agreement, you are required to wear this hard hat because it will give you "full protection" from a concrete slab or 20 foot steel beam falling on your head"
Now, strictly speaking: it does give you more protection than not wearing one even against a concrete slab or 20 foot steel beam falling on your head but dont dress it up as full protection or that the slab and beam wont hit your head because you're wearing it (which again: strictly speaking it will hit the hard hat first)
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:23 pm
Each day we hear about the number of new COVID cases here in South Australia.
Behind each number is a real person, and most hadn’t had their third COVID shot. Many thought they were fully protected, not realising that double vaxxed isn’t fully vaxxed.
by DOC » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:25 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:38 pm
DOC wrote:I think I will refer to you as Mr DoubtPfizer in future.
by Booney » Mon Jun 20, 2022 2:43 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 9:23 pm
DOC wrote:I think I will refer to you as Mr DoubtPfizer in future.
by Jimmy_041 » Thu Jun 23, 2022 6:43 am
by Vamos » Thu Jun 23, 2022 10:26 pm
Jimmy_041 wrote:A couple of months ago they predicted 10,000 cases per day
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/coronavi ... bd39d4061d
Peak at 6,000 by July 12th
Let’s see how close they can get
by Jimmy_041 » Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:26 am
Jimmy_041 wrote:A couple of months ago they predicted 10,000 cases per day
https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/coronavi ... bd39d4061d
Peak at 6,000 by July 12th
Let’s see how close they can get
by JohnnyDog » Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:46 am
by Armchair expert » Mon Jun 27, 2022 11:55 am
JohnnyDog wrote:I like the black jelly beans and yes the science is settled for sure.
Lightning McQueen wrote:You're a legend
by tipper » Tue Jun 28, 2022 10:31 am
by Psyber » Tue Jun 28, 2022 8:10 pm
by gazzamagoo » Wed Jun 29, 2022 9:03 am
Psyber wrote:I had a mild dose of Covid back in March, after two AZ shots and one Pfizer. Basically, I had a runny nose and a bit of sneezing for 3 days, but no temperature rise. I didn't believe the positive RAT with no temperature rise, and so I had the PCR to confirm it. I've recently had another Pfizer booster.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |