What about the 999,999 they get right?
Geez .....poor one in a million

by overloaded » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:08 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Zelezny Chucks » Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:26 pm
overloaded wrote:Why concentrate on the 1 in a million that thew jury gets wrong.
What about the 999,999 they get right?
Geez .....poor one in a million
by Jim05 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:14 pm
by GWW » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:34 pm
by BIG SEXY » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:41 am
Jim05 wrote:When there is absolutely no doubt and they confess to it then yes they should be put to death.
This guy confessed to these horrible murders, i have no problem with his life being ended
by overloaded » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:53 am
Jim05 wrote:When there is absolutely no doubt and they confess to it then yes they should be put to death.
This guy confessed to these horrible murders, i have no problem with his life being ended
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by tipper » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:59 am
by HH3 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:02 am
by Q. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:05 am
overloaded wrote:Jim05 wrote:When there is absolutely no doubt and they confess to it then yes they should be put to death.
This guy confessed to these horrible murders, i have no problem with his life being ended
This is what I am talking about. But Zelzeny cant see past that poor 1 in a million bloke
by Q. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:06 am
by Booney » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:09 am
Q. wrote:I just couldn't stay out of this moronic thread
by Q. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:17 am
Booney wrote:Q. wrote:I just couldn't stay out of this moronic thread
I knew you'd be back...
by Q. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:17 am
by westcoastpanther » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:38 am
Q. wrote:State-sanctioned murder does not deter homicide, does not deter crime and does not protect society.
It does the opposite, it's known as the brutalisation effect - "Execution stimulates homicides in three ways: (1) executions desensitize the public to the immorality of killing, increasing the probability that some people will then decide to kill; (2) the state legitimizes the notion that vengeance for past misdeeds is acceptable; and (3) executions also have an imitation effect, where people actually follow the example set by the state, after all, people feel if the government can kill its enemies, so can they."
You can't permanently eliminate everyone that **** up in life and the Hitler-esque thirst for social cleansing is pathetic.
by OnSong » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:44 am
by The Ash Man » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:50 am
by HH3 » Fri Mar 30, 2012 10:51 am
westcoastpanther wrote:Q. wrote:State-sanctioned murder does not deter homicide, does not deter crime and does not protect society.
It does the opposite, it's known as the brutalisation effect - "Execution stimulates homicides in three ways: (1) executions desensitize the public to the immorality of killing, increasing the probability that some people will then decide to kill; (2) the state legitimizes the notion that vengeance for past misdeeds is acceptable; and (3) executions also have an imitation effect, where people actually follow the example set by the state, after all, people feel if the government can kill its enemies, so can they."
You can't permanently eliminate everyone that **** up in life and the Hitler-esque thirst for social cleansing is pathetic.
Where did you cut and paste that crap from? Believe everything you read?
Comparing us to Hitler is a joke, he slaughtered innocent people. We just want to cleanse the world of murderers. What a comparison that is.....
by Hondo » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:06 am
by Q. » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:09 am
westcoastpanther wrote:Q. wrote:State-sanctioned murder does not deter homicide, does not deter crime and does not protect society.
It does the opposite, it's known as the brutalisation effect - "Execution stimulates homicides in three ways: (1) executions desensitize the public to the immorality of killing, increasing the probability that some people will then decide to kill; (2) the state legitimizes the notion that vengeance for past misdeeds is acceptable; and (3) executions also have an imitation effect, where people actually follow the example set by the state, after all, people feel if the government can kill its enemies, so can they."
You can't permanently eliminate everyone that **** up in life and the Hitler-esque thirst for social cleansing is pathetic.
Where did you cut and paste that crap from? Believe everything you read?
by Psyber » Fri Mar 30, 2012 11:11 am
I'd be very surprised if incorrect convictions were only one in a million.overloaded wrote:This is what I am talking about. But Zelzeny cant see past that poor 1 in a million blokeJim05 wrote:When there is absolutely no doubt and they confess to it then yes they should be put to death.
This guy confessed to these horrible murders, i have no problem with his life being ended
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |