by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 06, 2013 6:58 pm
by Jimmy_041 » Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:03 pm
by helicopterking » Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:12 pm
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:48 pm
helicopterking wrote:Syria has Oil right?
by helicopterking » Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:59 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:helicopterking wrote:Syria has Oil right?
Mmmm, dunno. I don't think that's the issue anyway.
by Punk Rooster » Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:40 pm
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Q. » Fri Sep 06, 2013 10:45 pm
by Sky Pilot » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:41 pm
Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?
Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.
by Pseudo » Fri Sep 06, 2013 11:53 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?
Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.
The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.
by Sky Pilot » Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:07 am
Pseudo wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?
Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.
The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.
The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.
by helicopterking » Sat Sep 07, 2013 8:17 am
Sky Pilot wrote:Pseudo wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?
Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.
The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.
The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.
What part of bodies without any visible injuries and foaming at the nose and mouth lying on the ground and sarin residue discovered on their clothes and on the ground don't you understand. I agree there was no evidence of WMDs in Iraq but here's your evidence as discovered by UN inspectors.
by Bully » Sat Sep 07, 2013 9:23 am
helicopterking wrote:
Yes I did see this. But what if it was a set up. I guess that's why they are delaying. America barely need a reason to take over a country.
by tigerpie » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:15 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sat Sep 07, 2013 10:59 am
tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...
by GWW » Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:06 am
by Bully » Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:07 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...
America want to rule the world
plus a war is great for their economy
by whufc » Sat Sep 07, 2013 11:58 am
tigerpie wrote:I dont understand why, when shit goes down in some far off country that its up to America to jump in...
by Pseudo » Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:35 pm
Sky Pilot wrote:Pseudo wrote:Sky Pilot wrote:Q. wrote:Did Assad really use chemical warfare on his own citizens though?
Don't think it matters now, it's what everyone believes happened.
The evidence is overwhelming according to all the news reports.
The evidence of Iraq's WMDs was overwhelming too.
What part of bodies without any visible injuries and foaming at the nose and mouth lying on the ground and sarin residue discovered on their clothes and on the ground don't you understand.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |