by dedja » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:21 am
by CK » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:33 am
by dedja » Mon Jan 23, 2012 8:59 am
by tipper » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:09 am
by CENTURION » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:16 am
by Booney » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:48 am
CENTURION wrote:let's go to their church & express our opinions.
by Gingernuts » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:19 am
Booney wrote:CENTURION wrote:let's go to their church & express our opinions.
Boom!! Best idea you have had!!!
by Booney » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:24 am
CK wrote:If the average person went on public transport, ranting and shouting at passengers, they would be ejected from the bus/train.
If the average person on their own, started yelling in Rundle Mall and accosting people, they would be warned and arrested if they didn't cease.
Quite why this group is allowed such free rein to "perform" as they do, impinging on the rights of people to walk the Mall/public places without being harrassed, is completely beyond me. The term "right to free speech" becomes a very convenient fallback for a percentage who actively abuse that right to the detriment of others who do not want their equal right to peace being impinged upon.
by Pseudo » Mon Jan 23, 2012 10:25 am
by Banker » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:10 pm
Booney wrote:CK wrote:If the average person went on public transport, ranting and shouting at passengers, they would be ejected from the bus/train.
If the average person on their own, started yelling in Rundle Mall and accosting people, they would be warned and arrested if they didn't cease.
Quite why this group is allowed such free rein to "perform" as they do, impinging on the rights of people to walk the Mall/public places without being harrassed, is completely beyond me. The term "right to free speech" becomes a very convenient fallback for a percentage who actively abuse that right to the detriment of others who do not want their equal right to peace being impinged upon.
I have heard one of them mention they are looking forward to the day they front court on any charges relating to their arrest for preaching and what impact freedom of speech laws would have on these charges. IIRC one of them has asked to be arrested.
by Booney » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:15 pm
Banker wrote:Booney wrote:CK wrote:If the average person went on public transport, ranting and shouting at passengers, they would be ejected from the bus/train.
If the average person on their own, started yelling in Rundle Mall and accosting people, they would be warned and arrested if they didn't cease.
Quite why this group is allowed such free rein to "perform" as they do, impinging on the rights of people to walk the Mall/public places without being harrassed, is completely beyond me. The term "right to free speech" becomes a very convenient fallback for a percentage who actively abuse that right to the detriment of others who do not want their equal right to peace being impinged upon.
I have heard one of them mention they are looking forward to the day they front court on any charges relating to their arrest for preaching and what impact freedom of speech laws would have on these charges. IIRC one of them has asked to be arrested.
Huh? What freedom of speech laws?
by Squawk » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:33 pm
by Q. » Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:35 pm
by valleys07 » Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:28 pm
CENTURION wrote:let's go to their church & express our opinions.
by Psyber » Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:42 pm
by CENTURION » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:52 pm
by Brucetiki » Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:58 pm
by CENTURION » Tue Jan 24, 2012 7:53 am
Brucetiki wrote:As much as I'd love for Ann Moran to be brought down a peg or two, I don't want it done by this mob.
Best thing to do with them is ignore them. You know that they say about arguing with idiots...
by Sojourner » Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:03 pm
by dedja » Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:08 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |