Banned Tim Tams?

Anything!

Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:44 am

Tim Tams banned by Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore at council events

The Daily Telegraph


SYDNEY Lord Mayor Clover Moore has banned Tim Tams from council events for fear they're partially produced through cruel child labour on Africa's Ivory Coast.

In a move to create "sustainable, healthy and cruelty-free catering" at City of Sydney meetings and events, staff have stopped providing chocolate biscuits along with meals containing eggs, bottled water, fat-rich cakes, dairy deserts and "bad" fish species.

One of the first attempts at the new politically correct meals policy was at the council's Investing in Sydney's Future business forum on February 25.

On the menu were vegetables (locally grown), NSW wines (organic) and "a good fish species choice" (blue-eye trevalla).

Liberal councillor Shayne Mallard, who was at a briefing on the guidelines, said the first hint of the new policy was when Tim Tams disappeared from meetings.

"We are being dictated to by a radical green agenda telling us what fish we can eat, what water we drink and banning eggs or Tim Tams instead of focusing on issues like saving jobs," Mr Mallard said.


Anne Smith
"Council staff told me Tim Tams were banned because 80 per cent of world cocoa production comes from the Ivory Coast, where there are allegations of child labour."

An Arnott's spokeswoman said only a very limited supply of chocolate was from the Ivory Coast.

"But this supplier is a member of the International Cocoa Initiative, which is dedicated to ensuring no child is exploited in the growing of cocoa and to ending child and forced labour," she said.

Requests for comment from Ms Moore were declined yesterday but a spokeswoman said: "No particular brand of food or drink has been identified as being off the menu."

In a memo obtained by The Daily Telegraph, the council's environmental projects manager Kirsten Woodward said the council would serve only cruelty-free and healthy options.

"Vegan, vegetarian and lactose intolerant options have also been developed for future events," Ms Woodward's memo said.


are they for real? seriously. I dont eat Tim Tams and think "gee i wonder if a child was exploited in the making of this awesome snack" not to be cruel, but who would?
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby HH3 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:48 am

wankers
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby The Ash Man » Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:51 am

FFS there are way too many do-gooders in society
He obviously didnt do too much research before making this stupid decision
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Pseudo » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:12 am

The Ash Man wrote:FFS there are way too many do-gooders in society
He obviously didnt do too much research before making this stupid decision


She, actually. It figures... ;)
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12266
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1658 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:17 am

It's awareness. Awareness of your social and ecological footprints. Think about your childhood - would you have rather been stitching brand name clothes for twelve hours a day and all for a dollar, just so some first world prat can keep up with the latest fashion?

And then we'll complain when more and more of these companies shift their manufacturing divisions to the third world. The idea is not to boycott these companies, but rather push for unionised working conditions such that there cannot be exploitation.


HOWEVER,

Regarding the specific matter of Ivory Coast cocoa (which does not have operate under the same dynamic as offshore clothing manufacturers), there is a heap of unsubstantiated Western hype pushed by the 'noble' Western reporter. The facts on the ground are that the farms are mostly family operated and yes, the children of those families don't have a say on whether they work on these farms. It is not slave labour though. Yes, it is hard work, and yes, the children miss out on a little bit of school, but the work that they do on their family farms helps pay for the school fees!!! A boycott of Ivory Coast cocoa would be catastrophic for the country's economy and for the livelihoods of these families - which would ultimately force children to be sold into actual slave labour!

The problem is not necessarily with the chocolate manufacturers, but with the government of the Ivory Coast who imposes heavy levies and taxes on the farmers, almost as much as what they get from the chocolate manufacturers. It is not the chocolate manufacturers (who are still essentially bound by world prices) living off the people, but the all too common corrupt Government.



I find it funny that they would boycott Ivory Coast chocolate, but be happy to wear clothes that are actually made under slave labour conditions :?
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:28 am

Quichey wrote:It's awareness. Awareness of your social and ecological footprints. Think about your childhood - would you have rather been stitching brand name clothes for twelve hours a day and all for a dollar, just so some first world prat can keep up with the latest fashion?

And then we'll complain when more and more of these companies shift their manufacturing divisions to the third world. The idea is not to boycott these companies, but rather push for unionised working conditions such that there cannot be exploitation.


HOWEVER,

Regarding the specific matter of Ivory Coast cocoa (which does not have operate under the same dynamic as offshore clothing manufacturers), there is a heap of unsubstantiated Western hype pushed by the 'noble' Western reporter. The facts on the ground are that the farms are mostly family operated and yes, the children of those families don't have a say on whether they work on these farms. It is not slave labour though. Yes, it is hard work, and yes, the children miss out on a little bit of school, but the work that they do on their family farms helps pay for the school fees!!! A boycott of Ivory Coast cocoa would be catastrophic for the country's economy and for the livelihoods of these families - which would ultimately force children to be sold into actual slave labour!

The problem is not necessarily with the chocolate manufacturers, but with the government of the Ivory Coast who imposes heavy levies and taxes on the farmers, almost as much as what they get from the chocolate manufacturers. It is not the chocolate manufacturers (who are still essentially bound by world prices) living off the people, but the all too common corrupt Government.



I find it funny that they would boycott Ivory Coast chocolate, but be happy to wear clothes that are actually made under slave labour conditions :?


well said :)
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby smac » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:44 am

More for me.
smac
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13092
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:19 am
Location: Golden Grove
Has liked: 168 times
Been liked: 233 times
Grassroots Team: Salisbury

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Dirko » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:53 pm

smac wrote:More for me.


and me too !
The joy of being on the hill drinking beer cannot be understated
User avatar
Dirko
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11456
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 7:17 pm
Location: Snouts Hill
Has liked: 6 times
Been liked: 2 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:58 pm

makes you wonder though, that soon they will all have to be nude, as to not wear clothing coming from factories that pay below the minimum wage and exploit their workers, cant wear deodorant as it is ruining the ozone layer, wont be able to use pens and have to write with charcoal as pens cant be recycled, and *gasp* only have one ply toilet paper!


i'm all for fair trade etc, but come on.
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Dogwatcher » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:05 pm

I'm sure you really doooo want to be nude WGT....
You're my only friend, and you don't even like me.
Dogwatcher
Coach
 
 
Posts: 29318
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:29 am
Location: The Bronx
Has liked: 1425 times
Been liked: 1152 times
Grassroots Team: Elizabeth

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:28 pm

whatcha got there? wrote:makes you wonder though, that soon they will all have to be nude, as to not wear clothing coming from factories that pay below the minimum wage and exploit their workers, cant wear deodorant as it is ruining the ozone layer, wont be able to use pens and have to write with charcoal as pens cant be recycled, and *gasp* only have one ply toilet paper!


Well, if you wanna be a hippy...

I'm not saying there are absolutes, just that everything we do or don't do has consequences for others (and I'm sure there's a deep tangent in there about our unhealthy reliance on our current capitalist model). This is no different to us being careful about our water usage.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby amber_fluid » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:31 pm

Quichey wrote:
whatcha got there? wrote:makes you wonder though, that soon they will all have to be nude, as to not wear clothing coming from factories that pay below the minimum wage and exploit their workers, cant wear deodorant as it is ruining the ozone layer, wont be able to use pens and have to write with charcoal as pens cant be recycled, and *gasp* only have one ply toilet paper!


Well, if you wanna be a hippy...

I'm not saying there are absolutes, just that everything we do or don't do has consequences for others (and I'm sure there's a deep tangent in there about our unhealthy reliance on our current capitalist model). This is no different to us being careful about our water usage.


Are we careful about water usage coz we want to be or have to be?? ;)
There are no stupid questions, just stupid people.
User avatar
amber_fluid
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15474
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 10:18 am
Has liked: 2382 times
Been liked: 2891 times

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Q. » Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:37 pm

Which brings us to the age old adage, "What we want and what we need are two different things".

But to answer your question, noone gives a **** until they are forced to give a ****.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:03 pm

Dogwatcher wrote:I'm sure you really doooo want to be nude WGT....


would beat the somewhat uncomfortable work uniform, but sadly no. i'm not a closet nudist, or any type of nudist for that matter.
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby HH3 » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:17 pm

whatcha got there? wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I'm sure you really doooo want to be nude WGT....


would beat the somewhat uncomfortable work uniform, but sadly no. i'm not a closet nudist, or any type of nudist for that matter.


Now you've just ruined the mental image i had of you...thanks a lot haha ;) :D
I TOLD YOU SO

2013/14 NFL Tipping Comp Champion
User avatar
HH3
Coach
 
Posts: 11643
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 2:14 pm
Has liked: 3301 times
Been liked: 2433 times
Grassroots Team: North Haven

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:26 pm

hackham_hawk_3 wrote:
whatcha got there? wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:I'm sure you really doooo want to be nude WGT....


would beat the somewhat uncomfortable work uniform, but sadly no. i'm not a closet nudist, or any type of nudist for that matter.


Now you've just ruined the mental image i had of you...thanks a lot haha ;) :D


men, honestly.... :roll: lol
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Psyber » Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:42 pm

A better reason to ban them would be because of the tartrazine in them - still there last time I looked at a packet.
There is support for the allergy reports scattered in the medical literature, though I can't recall specifics as I haven't read it recently.
Asthma attacks, and hyperactivity in children, have been reported in that literature.
I gave up Tim Tams because of my own reactions to them in the late 1980s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tartrazine
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby whatcha got there? » Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:08 pm

Psyber wrote:A better reason to ban them would be because of the tartrazine in them - still there last time I looked at a packet.
There is support for the allergy reports scattered in the medical literature, though I can't recall specifics as I haven't read it recently.
Asthma attacks, and hyperactivity in children, have been reported in that literature.
I gave up Tim Tams because of my own reactions to them in the late 1980s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tartrazine


psyber, dont bloody ruin it for me! :(
Libertine wrote:Have to agree with Blink even though he is a fool
User avatar
whatcha got there?
Under 18s
 
 
Posts: 592
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:19 pm
Location: La-La Land.
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Tasman

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby JAS » Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:58 pm

FC.....please don't let any of this convert you to the green side and put you off sending the 'red cross' parcel [-o< ...I'm still happy to eat Tim Tams :D ;) ;)

Regards
JAS
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
User avatar
JAS
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:22 pm
Location: Scotland
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Banned Tim Tams?

Postby Bully » Wed Mar 25, 2009 7:31 pm

banned Tim Tams?? how dare they. best biscuit going around. On the topic of biscuits... has anyone purchased the biscuits from Subway. When the worker behind the counter asks if you want any, i bet they say COOKIES. FFS we arent in America. They are called BISCUITS here!!!
Bully
Coach
 
Posts: 12496
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:28 am
Location: The best place on earth
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 120 times

Next

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |