Cadbury, what have they done?

Anything!

Re: Cadbury, what have they done?

Postby brod » Tue May 26, 2009 7:50 pm

The Ash Man wrote:I usually buy Pure Blonde but now buy it in the cans cos they are 375ml compared to 340ml stubbies for the same price, not much but its the principle


But can vs stubbie :(
User avatar
brod
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19195
Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: Willaston
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 28 times

Re: Cadbury, what have they done?

Postby The Ash Man » Tue May 26, 2009 9:42 pm

brod wrote:
The Ash Man wrote:I usually buy Pure Blonde but now buy it in the cans cos they are 375ml compared to 340ml stubbies for the same price, not much but its the principle


But can vs stubbie :(


I actually like it from the can! :shock:
User avatar
The Ash Man
Coach
 
 
Posts: 5511
Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 2:33 pm
Has liked: 382 times
Been liked: 261 times
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Re: Cadbury, what have they done?

Postby JAS » Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:57 pm

aceman wrote:Cadbury are reducing the size of a Family block of chocolate from 250gms back to 220gms, packing it a thin cardboard outer cover and it's still to be priced as if it were the larger size.
Pr^cks, they must think we're all silly, boycott the Cadbury chocolate range and buy Nestle, that's what I say!

If you agree, then follow me!


Not just Cadbury...now Galaxy (Mars) are doing the same over here and no doubt everywhere else too...
Regards
JAS

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090912/tu ... 23e80.html

The rising price of cocoa has forced Mars to reduce the size of its Galaxy bars by 17%, less than a year after increasing the price 26%, it has been reported.
The take-home Galaxy bar is being shrunk from 150g to 125g to avoid the need for further price hikes such as last November's, when the shelf price rose from £1 to £1.26, The Grocer magazine said.

Cocoa is suffering from supply issues caused by ageing crops in the West African growing region and by black pod disease, which renders more than a third of each year's harvest unusable, the magazine said.

It quoted one unnamed industry expert as saying the rises in the company's costs probably made the move justifiable - but added that it was a risky move when consumers were generally expecting falling prices.

"Mars' tactic of reducing pack size less than a year after a substantial retail price hike is a dangerous game," she said.

"Whether it was Mars' original intention, or just bad timing, this is a very raw deal for consumers, who are paying significantly more for significantly less."

A spokesman for the company told the Press Association: "Like all food manufacturers we face significant cost increases due to rising commodity prices and higher production costs.

"Whilst we look to absorb these costs where we can, sometimes the weight or price of a product will change.

"We work hard to ensure that we continue to offer great value for money to our consumers."
You can't be a pirate if you don't have a beard. I said so. MY boat, MY rules.

We haven't got a plank. Just ******* jump


Trust no one The truth is everyone is going to let you down you eventually
User avatar
JAS
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12431
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 8:22 pm
Location: Scotland
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Previous

Board index   General Talk  General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |