by Zorro » Wed Nov 03, 2010 12:34 pm
by 7-Dog » Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:01 pm
Bum Crack wrote:The worse thing, is they will be in protective custody for their entire sentence, due to the fact that fellow prisoners don't take too kindly towards offences involving children.
by fisho mcspaz » Wed Nov 03, 2010 5:23 pm
by Punk Rooster » Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:47 pm
Bum Crack wrote:The worse thing, is they will be in protective custody for their entire sentence, due to the fact that fellow prisoners don't take too kindly towards offences involving children.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Bum Crack » Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:53 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:Bum Crack wrote:The worse thing, is they will be in protective custody for their entire sentence, due to the fact that fellow prisoners don't take too kindly towards offences involving children.
they'll be worse off in protective- prisoners aren't stupid, they'll be wanting to know why they aren't in mainstream.
by Punk Rooster » Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:23 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Punk Rooster wrote:Bum Crack wrote:The worse thing, is they will be in protective custody for their entire sentence, due to the fact that fellow prisoners don't take too kindly towards offences involving children.
they'll be worse off in protective- prisoners aren't stupid, they'll be wanting to know why they aren't in mainstream.
Won't matter, because they won't be able to get to them.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |