by magpie in the 80's » Fri Nov 16, 2007 7:21 pm
Coach Steve Folkes has claimed his plundered Bulldogs will be better off without Test star Willie Mason, even as they head towards 2008 as rank outsiders to claim the NRL premiership.
Folkes' media appearances can usually be likened to a trip to the dentist but the Dogs mentor was uncharacteristically candid at Belmore on Friday as he got the Mason saga off his chest.
That included the suggestion that Mason's defection to the Sydney Roosters on a three-year deal had been his aim all through his public brawl with the Bulldogs, and an admission that the friendship between the player and his ex-coach had suffered.
Asked directly if he believed the departure of one of the game's biggest stars - on top of the loss of experienced duo Mark O'Meley and Brent Sherwin - was the better outcome for the club, Folkes pulled no punches.
"Yes I do," he said.
"We'll move on, we'll be a much tighter unit."
And that will partly be because the Bulldogs players added their voices to the decision, Folkes said.
"This has been a joint decision," he said.
"It's been made out like it's been solely a management decision but I can assure the players had some input and it's the right decision for this club at this time."
But possibly his most explosive remark came when asked why he thought Mason had wanted out of the club.
"I guess if I was a cynic I might say that this whole thing was engineered so that he could end up at the Roosters, but I'm not," Folkes said.
"I don't know, it blew up very quickly as a result of us wishing to sit down with Willie and his management and resolve a few issues with regard to wearing the right apparel, fulfilling obligations to sponsors.
"It's disappointing that it was played out in the media as it was. It certainly wasn't of our making that that happened."
Folkes said a strong message needed to be sent to his other players and to sponsors that club obligations needed to be fulfilled.
"Willie wasn't prepared to fall in line and do some of the things he was requested to do and fulfil those obligations," he said.
"I don't believe anyone's naive enough to believe that we let Willie Mason go because he didn't attend one grand final function."
And it appears friendships have been stretched by the ugly split.
"It's not a bag Willie Mason session, he was great for us on the field over a long period of time," Folkes said.
"He had some really good mates here and I'd like to consider that I was one of his mates and maybe still am."
Mason had claimed several more Bulldogs wanted out of Belmore but Folkes said he had personally spoken with those rumoured to be disgruntled and "that certainly wasn't the case".
He also rejected Mason's claim the famed Bulldogs' culture had gone downhill during the player's time there.
The Dogs have been depleted in recent seasons, particularly in the front row with the losses of O'Meley, Mason, Roy Asotasi and Steve Price but Folkes said he would relish life as an outsider.
"Being 25-1 I reckon is good, most years we're fairly short and I think it gives us the opportunity to prepare for the season away from the spotlight," he said.
With clubs close to finalising their 2008 rosters, the Dogs are likely to be major players for big names off contract in 2009.
"It remains to be seen whether we go outside and look for someone of high profile or whether we try and bring some young guys through but it certainly gives us the option of doing either," Folkes said.
Mason responded to Folkes on Friday night in a statement to the Nine Network.
"Steve Folkes does not have my respect or the respect of the players," he was quoted as saying by Nine.
"I'm very disappointed he's made this personal because I avoided that yesterday, but now the gloves are off."
The Nine report also claimed Mason had said Folkes was a large part of the reason he had left the Bulldogs.
©AAP 2007
I went to a fight the other night, and a hockey game broke out. - Rodney Dangerfield (1921 - 2004)