by Major Gun » Tue Feb 09, 2010 8:42 am
by wristwatcher » Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:52 pm
by Neville Bartoss » Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:09 pm
by Swooper16 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:20 pm
by Neville Bartoss » Wed Feb 10, 2010 3:37 pm
Swooper16 wrote:Cant say I am all that keen on the "politics" that is SA Gaelic footy... anyone believe Onkas can be beaten for this years Hannigan cup...?
by Swooper16 » Wed Feb 10, 2010 4:05 pm
by O'Neills Only » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:28 pm
Neville Bartoss wrote:As far as Im concerned I play gaelic as a means of keeping the fitness up in the pre season and catching up with mates. I pay my registration and I pay to play. Just because I play does not mean I need to be a part of the committee, organising a team for Flinders each week is a job in its self!
From my experiences that I have had with the president and secretary I believe they do a great job, they put in alot of time and effort to run the comp especially considering all the other commitments they have with work etc.
The only problem Ive ever had is with a minority of persons on the current committee (mainly involved with the mens sides) who seem to influence the other members of the committee with their decision making. Unfortunately this often creates the situation where decisions are based on the opinions and personal gripes rather than those based on the facts. There needs to be some sort of independent body where matters can be heard once a decison is made by the committee (or should I say two persons).
Last year I appealed a suspension I was given. In the hearing there was a committee representative, myself, and a flinders representative. The independent person overseeing the whole hearing and making the final decision was........the past president of the committee who was president at the time of the incident!! The referee involved was not required to attend and the decision was made based on a one line match report. Im not saying my actions were appropriate (calling the ref a joke) but all we asked for was a fair hearing, and in my opinion a 3 game suspension (was initially 6) was excessive where I believe a one match ban was more than appropriate.
The system is a joke and im not even going to bring up our most recent appeal which cost us one hundred dollars and we weren't even permitted to have a representative club rep or player involved present during this hearing.
by O'Neills Only » Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:43 pm
by Cheese Twisties » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:56 am
by Flinders O'Neills » Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:10 pm
by Neville Bartoss » Thu Feb 11, 2010 9:29 pm
O'Neills Only wrote:Neville Bartoss wrote:As far as Im concerned I play gaelic as a means of keeping the fitness up in the pre season and catching up with mates. I pay my registration and I pay to play. Just because I play does not mean I need to be a part of the committee, organising a team for Flinders each week is a job in its self!
From my experiences that I have had with the president and secretary I believe they do a great job, they put in alot of time and effort to run the comp especially considering all the other commitments they have with work etc.
The only problem Ive ever had is with a minority of persons on the current committee (mainly involved with the mens sides) who seem to influence the other members of the committee with their decision making. Unfortunately this often creates the situation where decisions are based on the opinions and personal gripes rather than those based on the facts. There needs to be some sort of independent body where matters can be heard once a decison is made by the committee (or should I say two persons).
Last year I appealed a suspension I was given. In the hearing there was a committee representative, myself, and a flinders representative. The independent person overseeing the whole hearing and making the final decision was........the past president of the committee who was president at the time of the incident!! The referee involved was not required to attend and the decision was made based on a one line match report. Im not saying my actions were appropriate (calling the ref a joke) but all we asked for was a fair hearing, and in my opinion a 3 game suspension (was initially 6) was excessive where I believe a one match ban was more than appropriate.
The system is a joke and im not even going to bring up our most recent appeal which cost us one hundred dollars and we weren't even permitted to have a representative club rep or player involved present during this hearing.
Nifty, you've gotta let it go or at least come to terms with it. The Disciplinary processes and appeal processes we have are the same throughout the GAA in Ireland and everywhere. I for one would agree that they can be difficult to understand and penalties harsh, compared to other Aussie sport cultures. - but they are the rules. I've been on both ends - more of the receiving than the giving and it certainly is a test of one's commitment to the game.
The more recent one you refer to is a great example of us having control of our game. Our peers, through club delegates and committee members, have spoken - that's what we elect them to do. The last process was not a hearing. It was a determination by the national body that there were no grounds for appeal, ie: the State committee had not erred or misapplied a rule.
Now the only way one can try and get things changed is to actually get involved - and then it's a very long painstaking process - but every now and then you can make a difference; you can have some wins on the way. When it comes to the processes and penalties though, there needs to be significant change, at least at the national level - God and a few other people know we have tried.
Back to the general politics: as for the current committee, it has to be said that they are young, or relatively new and have some pretty big shoes to fill. They are trying new ideas and they are trying to have all clubs share the responsibility. Everybody's contribution is valuable - from the person trying the game for the first time, to people taking on roles within their own clubs, to club delegates, to committee members and ultimately to those that take on senior positions on committee and with State teams. It is a long, slow process and takes people years to develop. Mistakes will be made along the way, people will learn from them and they will improve upon them. We need to be very careful about how we go about voicing our criticism, no matter how valid it may be. The current committee is willing to run again and I know they will want to improve on their ideas moving forward.
It's a pity we don't have the resources to pay for a full time General Manager as other sporting organisations might have - it could be done though by increasing fees to our relatively small membership by about $70 to $100 per person per year - or an extra $5 per game. Food for thought. It would be worth it and you would get a lot done and take a lot of pressure off volunteers.
by Breaking Balls » Thu Feb 11, 2010 10:41 pm
by Major Gun » Fri Feb 12, 2010 8:15 am
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:25 am
by O'Neills Only » Fri Feb 12, 2010 9:26 pm
In relation to fees, its a bit more than the seventy dollars you speak of Oneills. There is a thirty dollar registration fee, and ten dollars per game. This equates to about one hundred and fifty dollars a season for twelve games plus a little more if you play finals.
it could be done though by increasing fees to our relatively small membership by about $70 to $100 per person per year - or an extra $5 per game.
by Cheese Twisties » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:10 pm
by Neville Bartoss » Sat Feb 13, 2010 1:07 pm
O'Neills Only wrote:NIfty said:In relation to fees, its a bit more than the seventy dollars you speak of Oneills. There is a thirty dollar registration fee, and ten dollars per game. This equates to about one hundred and fifty dollars a season for twelve games plus a little more if you play finals.
Yeah I know - probably more in fact. Here's what I said:it could be done though by increasing fees to our relatively small membership by about $70 to $100 per person per year - or an extra $5 per game.
Still cheap compared to just about any other sport.
by the milky bar kid » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:23 pm
by Neville Bartoss » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:36 pm
the milky bar kid wrote:No round up of the weekends games? Surely there was a little bit of quality gaelic going around on the weekend? Or was everybody trying to the right thing for valentines day & stay of safooty for just one night?
Anyway, I know Na Fianna came up trumps with a handy win over Mitcham. Flinders would now need to pull off a huge victory (to over come points difference as a result of losing the referee point) to displace the Warriors in the four.
I believe that after their 9-a-side contest that Onka's backed up with another win against WI. They are a fair chance to see each other in the post season tho.
I can only assume that the Taints accounted for IA.
Well done to the president Zues on his reffing performance, was it his reffing debut?
by the milky bar kid » Mon Feb 15, 2010 5:49 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |