by Strawb » Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:25 pm
by White Line Fever » Sat Nov 20, 2010 9:13 am
by Strawb » Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:02 am
White Line Fever wrote:i like numb nuts avatar
he posts on SAAFL Div3 2011
I'm looking for a new one.. tough decision.
by Dutchy » Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:08 pm
by Strawb » Sat Nov 20, 2010 2:58 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:25 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Strawb » Sat Nov 20, 2010 6:41 pm
Wedgie wrote:Ive had a play around with your permissions and think I have given you access to put up an avatar again, please PM me if you have any issues.
by White Line Fever » Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:06 pm
by Strawb » Sat Nov 20, 2010 7:23 pm
White Line Fever wrote:Ahhhh strawb always pushing to the edge haha
I like it.
by Media Park » Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:23 pm
White Line Fever wrote:i like numb nuts avatar
he posts on SAAFL Div3 2011
I'm looking for a new one.. tough decision.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Strawb » Sat Nov 20, 2010 8:38 pm
Media Park wrote:White Line Fever wrote:i like numb nuts avatar
he posts on SAAFL Div3 2011
I'm looking for a new one.. tough decision.
WLF is either being quite facetious, or it was too good it got removed...
by Psyber » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:02 am
by Media Park » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:12 am
Psyber wrote:I'd say IF's is acceptable as the woman is adequately clothed for a public site, even if the clothing over the breasts is not very obvious at a glance because of the colour.
Strawb is still pushing the margins with his new one, and if I were his boss I'd require him to draw it back a little in the workplace I ran as I would have a responsibility to ensure it didn't offend female employees who may see it there.
Also occasional visitors coming in have to be considered.
[Mind you in my workplace he would be there long if I caught him browsing the net or fora in work time.]
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Psyber » Sun Nov 21, 2010 9:15 am
Yes - thanks for pointing out my typo! While correcting it, I took the opportunity to add the indicator of the touch of humour I'd intended.Media Park wrote: Surely you mean wouldn't???
by Strawb » Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:01 am
Psyber wrote:Yes - thanks for pointing out my typo! While correcting it, I took the opportunity to add the indicator of the touch of humour I'd intended.Media Park wrote: Surely you mean wouldn't???
by Kahuna » Sun Nov 21, 2010 1:38 pm
by Media Park » Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:34 pm
Kahuna wrote:What is your avatar,Psyber? I can't quite make it out.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by GWW » Sun Nov 21, 2010 6:51 pm
Psyber wrote:[Mind you in my workplace he wouldn't be there long if I caught him browsing the net or fora in work time.]
by fish » Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:16 pm
Psyber wrote:I'd say IF's is acceptable as the woman is adequately clothed for a public site, even if the clothing over the breasts is not very obvious at a glance because of the colour.
Strawb is still pushing the margins with his new one, and if I were his boss I'd require him to draw it back a little in the workplace I ran as I would have a responsibility to ensure it didn't offend female employees who may see it there.
Also occasional visitors coming in have to be considered.
[Mind you in my workplace he wouldn't be there long if I caught him browsing the net or fora in work time.]
by Psyber » Tue Nov 23, 2010 11:04 am
That doesn't convince me - studies tend to find what they are designed to find..GWW wrote:http://uninews.unimelb.edu.au/news/5750/Psyber wrote:[Mind you in my workplace he wouldn't be there long if I caught him browsing the net or fora in work time.]
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |