by Strawb » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:18 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:30 pm
by Dutchy » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:36 pm
by Strawb » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:46 pm
Dutchy wrote:Do you open these threads at work Strawb?
Is this sort of stuff needed on this site (in moderation fine but pages and pages?) when the internet is a wonderful tool to be able to view anything you wish without having to come to safooty?
by Dutchy » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:13 pm
by White Line Fever » Tue Jul 06, 2010 5:20 pm
Dutchy wrote:I can see you point, and Im comfortable with the posting of suitable pictures in moderation. We have to consider everyone and we dont want boards clogged up with the same thing which may stop people posting. We also dont want anyone to open a thread at work which may cause them issues with their employer.
Would love to hear the views of others.
by southee » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:03 pm
by Ian » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:52 pm
by southee » Tue Jul 06, 2010 8:59 pm
Ian wrote:Our work policy is "nothing that any other person may find offensive" pretty much you cant open anything, those pic's as innocent as they may appear to most could cost someone else their job.
I'm sure a lot of others with similar employment aren't even aware that it's that tough. I know I wasn't 'till it cost me $1300 for a lawyer to keep it down to a reprimand. Now I wont even look at a forum, facebook or similar at work.
by Psyber » Wed Jul 07, 2010 10:45 am
by Media Park » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:18 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by devilsadvocate » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:06 pm
MarblePark wrote:lucky my boss views this site too!
by devilsadvocate » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:08 pm
Psyber wrote:If I were running a company only staff whose work actually required it would have any form of external Internet access, or email facility.
[And their use would be monitored.]
by Dogwatcher » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:11 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:MarblePark wrote:lucky my boss views this site too!
So he/she knows exactly how lazy you are![]()
The issue raised by OP is easy fixed for Mods. Put a *NSFW* in the title of each thread that's deemed borderline.
I don't think the site is over-moderated, I liken it to Hitler's Nazi Germany.
by devilsadvocate » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:14 pm
by Dutchy » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:26 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:
The issue raised by OP is easy fixed for Mods. Put a *NSFW* in the title of each thread that's deemed borderline.
by Strawb » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:31 pm
Dutchy wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:
The issue raised by OP is easy fixed for Mods. Put a *NSFW* in the title of each thread that's deemed borderline.
Exactly what we have been discussing.
After much discussion between the Mods the thread has returned and moved to the Entertainment board with NSFW which we will use as a warning that you may wish to open when at home not work. By doing this we will still make sure our rules are strictly enforced.
NSFW = Not Suitable For Work
by devilsadvocate » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:38 pm
Dutchy wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:
The issue raised by OP is easy fixed for Mods. Put a *NSFW* in the title of each thread that's deemed borderline.
Exactly what we have been discussing.
After much discussion between the Mods the thread has returned and moved to the Entertainment board with NSFW which we will use as a warning that you may wish to open when at home not work. By doing this we will still make sure our rules are strictly enforced.
NSFW = Not Suitable For Work
by Wedgie » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:08 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Pottsy » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:08 am
Psyber wrote:If I were running a company only staff whose work actually required it would have any form of external Internet access, or email facility.
[And their use would be monitored.]
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |