by Bully » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:54 pm
by Bully » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:56 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Most are happy just to be playing 1st team football Bully. Remember these guys are footballers first, millionaires second.
Going on loan is far better than kicking your heels in the reserves or not getting a game at all.
It also gives you the opportunity of showing your stuff on the bigger stage.
by JK » Tue Feb 01, 2011 6:56 pm
Bulldog wrote:i have never also understood the reason for a medical on a transfer etc. why is this needed? what do they do? test you for coccaine? or run around the oval in a certain time? surely torres would not have had any trouble in the medical whatever they do?
by johntheclaret » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:00 pm
by johntheclaret » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:02 pm
by Bully » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:02 pm
johntheclaret wrote:Would you want to shell out £50m and £140k a week for the next 4 years only to find your investment has some debilitating disease or crock knee?
Look what happened to Arsenal. Paid all that money for Arshavin only to find he is nearly blind and suffers from Headless Chicken Syndrome
by Jim05 » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:14 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:Bulldog wrote:i have never also understood the reason for a medical on a transfer etc. why is this needed? what do they do? test you for coccaine? or run around the oval in a certain time? surely torres would not have had any trouble in the medical whatever they do?
I can't recall too many who failed a medical, but it would be bad business not to check a player out before coughing up decent coin for them.
by mickey » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:25 pm
Bulldog wrote:johntheclaret wrote:Most are happy just to be playing 1st team football Bully. Remember these guys are footballers first, millionaires second.
Going on loan is far better than kicking your heels in the reserves or not getting a game at all.
It also gives you the opportunity of showing your stuff on the bigger stage.
but my point is tho JTC that if a club buys you you would want to play first team football there? why would you go to a club that has bought you and then go somewhere else to play. I would feel as a second choice? if a club buys you arent you good enough in their eyes?
by Bully » Sat Feb 05, 2011 3:11 pm
by JK » Sat Feb 05, 2011 6:55 pm
Bulldog wrote:i agree with all the responses for the loan deals...but my point is if you were bought from a club to say play full back and there was a player in that spot week in week out and then you are sent out on loan wouldnt you think you were a second thought??? you are a second choice to the club that bought you???...we want you to play for us at full back but sorry you need to go somewhere else to play until that position is vacant!!!... why buy the player then if that spot is already filled??
maybe i am the only one seeing this
by cossi11 » Sat Feb 05, 2011 6:56 pm
Bulldog wrote:i agree with all the responses for the loan deals...but my point is if you were bought from a club to say play full back and there was a player in that spot week in week out and then you are sent out on loan wouldnt you think you were a second thought??? you are a second choice to the club that bought you???...we want you to play for us at full back but sorry you need to go somewhere else to play until that position is vacant!!!... why buy the player then if that spot is already filled??
maybe i am the only one seeing this
by Bully » Sat Feb 05, 2011 10:11 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |