by bennymacca » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:01 pm
by whufc » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:03 pm
by heater31 » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:04 pm
whufc wrote:Melbourne equalise!!!!!!
by Jase » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:12 pm
heater31 wrote:whufc wrote:Melbourne equalise!!!!!!
Jeggo the useless prick was fast asleep for that corner [emoji15]
by Jim05 » Fri Oct 17, 2014 9:20 pm
by carey » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:00 pm
by heater31 » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:16 pm
carey wrote:Honest question.
What's wrong with the surface? Looks awesome to me.
by RB » Fri Oct 17, 2014 10:27 pm
by woodublieve12 » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:11 pm
Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
by mighty hounds » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:13 pm
RB wrote:Well they chose to flood the ground before the match and at half time.
by RB » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:31 pm
by legsman » Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:43 pm
Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
by Jim05 » Sat Oct 18, 2014 12:05 am
woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
Sub standard ground?!
by The Dark Knight » Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:28 am
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
Sub standard ground?!
For soccer yes.
One of the best surfaces in the world for cricket and probably the best in the country for AFL but it aint a soccer ground. Time to give up on the experiment. Next week at Etihad will see a similar scenerio for the Melbourne Derby, far better to play it at AAMI park. As a fan the experience isnt great either, crowd is far too far away from the pitch which negates the crowd factor.
Tonights game would of packed Hindmarsh and the atmosphere would of been electric and the standard of the game far better
by JK » Sat Oct 18, 2014 5:18 am
Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
Sub standard ground?!
For soccer yes.
One of the best surfaces in the world for cricket and probably the best in the country for AFL but it aint a soccer ground. Time to give up on the experiment. Next week at Etihad will see a similar scenerio for the Melbourne Derby, far better to play it at AAMI park. As a fan the experience isnt great either, crowd is far too far away from the pitch which negates the crowd factor.
Tonights game would of packed Hindmarsh and the atmosphere would of been electric and the standard of the game far better
by Bully » Sat Oct 18, 2014 6:43 am
Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
by whufc » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:24 am
Bully wrote:Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
I guess because its not flat like a football ( soccer ) ground should be like ? As its curved for drainage ?
Decent crowd there thou
by whufc » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:27 am
JK wrote:Jim05 wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Jim05 wrote:Further evidence of why games shouldnt be played at sub standard grounds. Would rather a decent game infront of 1000 people than see that crap dished up. Totally unsuitable for soccer, hopefully thats the last time they play there.
Result was fair in the end
Sub standard ground?!
For soccer yes.
One of the best surfaces in the world for cricket and probably the best in the country for AFL but it aint a soccer ground. Time to give up on the experiment. Next week at Etihad will see a similar scenerio for the Melbourne Derby, far better to play it at AAMI park. As a fan the experience isnt great either, crowd is far too far away from the pitch which negates the crowd factor.
Tonights game would of packed Hindmarsh and the atmosphere would of been electric and the standard of the game far better
J agree about the standard of football at Adelaide Oval, never seen a quality game there. That said, the club always comes under fire for their lack of recruiting/spending yet when they do something like this, something which earns extra $ we barrel them for it. Hard for them to win.
by JK » Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:35 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |