Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:32 amSo with Watson out will Gablett be back in to lessen the midfield pain?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:32 amRe: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:14 amI'd hope so, I got totally blindsided, hadn't even bothered changing my vice for weeks, it hurt me in DT.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:48 pmWhispers that Ablett may miss again. Surely he's too worried about his Brownlow to miss again.
regards,
REB
regards,
REB
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:10 pmLycett in for Nic Nat is the rumour in the West
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:04 amRik E Boy wrote:Whispers that Ablett may miss again. Surely he's too worried about his Brownlow to miss again.
regards,
REB
named
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:45 amAlaska wrote:Lycett in for Nic Nat is the rumour in the West
Nicholls in for Nick Nat is the rumour up North.
regards,
REB
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:27 am1 change for me this week- Deledio replaced Watson.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:56 am2 Changes this week.
Maccaffer to Stevie J
Watson to Kennedy
Maccaffer to Stevie J
Watson to Kennedy
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:02 pmMythical Creature wrote:Maccaffer to Stevie J
I want to do this sooo bad. I need to downgrade Neade to get the cash and there aren't really any good rookies on the bubble.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:16 pmQ. wrote:Mythical Creature wrote:Maccaffer to Stevie J
I want to do this sooo bad. I need to downgrade Neade to get the cash and there aren't really any good rookies on the bubble.
Greedy bugger. Your team is good enough already.
regards,
REB
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:36 pmWho do you guys think would have the better job security out of Greenwood and Tommy Mitchell?
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:06 pmJK wrote:Who do you guys think would have the better job security out of Greenwood and Tommy Mitchell?
Greenwood still has a bit to prove and has been on the outer most of the season.
Mitchell may get the odd rest and vest but I think is proving good enough to stay on at Sydney.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:23 pmI never thought I'd see the day, I have Buddy sitting on my bench.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 4:28 pmLightning McQueen wrote:I never thought I'd see the day, I have Buddy sitting on my bench.
It might not matter as it doesn't look like he's travelled with the team and doesn't look like he's playing
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 6:51 pmvalleys07 wrote:1 change for me this week- Deledio replaced Watson.
Changed my mind and went Mitchell instead of deledio to spare some cash.
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:16 pmRik E Boy wrote:Alaska wrote:Lycett in for Nic Nat is the rumour in the West
Nicholls in for Nick Nat is the rumour up North.
regards,
REB
OK take you on your word........... I dare you............ Pendlles for me!
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:11 pmDangerfield could make the difference only 4 disposals
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:32 pmWas going to make Dangerfield my VC glad I didn't!Alaska wrote:Dangerfield could make the difference only 4 disposals
Went Pendlebury instead, who has 60pts at half time.
My Hogg opponent has Swan VC 83pts at half time!
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:12 pmfish wrote:Was going to make Dangerfield my VC glad I didn't!Alaska wrote:Dangerfield could make the difference only 4 disposals
Went Pendlebury instead, who has 60pts at half time.
My Hogg opponent has Swan VC 83pts at half time!
Comeonnnn FISH jump on Pendells he is our way forward.
But is it only me that believes..........
Re: Round 16 Discussion
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:19 pm3/4 time Pendlebury 95, Swan 101. Dangerfield getting into the game a little despite his injury has 49.Alaska wrote:Comeonnnn FISH jump on Pendells he is our way forward. But is it only me that believes..........fish wrote:Was going to make Dangerfield my VC glad I didn't!Alaska wrote:Dangerfield could make the difference only 4 disposals
Went Pendlebury instead, who has 60pts at half time.
My Hogg opponent has Swan VC 83pts at half time!