Page 1 of 3

He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 1:47 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Most of you would have certain picks (barring injury) already.

Obvious ones

Gary Ablett
Brett Goodes

For me

Shane Mumford

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:23 pm
by Rik E Boy
Shane Mumford a lock? Hardly. Can't stay on the park and I am a fan.

regards,

REB

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 5:40 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Can put up big numbers REB. Priced attractively for an elite ruckman.

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:31 pm
by Rik E Boy
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Can put up big numbers REB. Priced attractively for an elite ruckman.


Yeah because he can't stay on the park. Goldstein the better option.

regards,

REB

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:45 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Are you in my league REB?

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 9:48 pm
by Rik E Boy
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Are you in my league REB?


Nope.

regards,

REB

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:15 pm
by Dogmatic
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Most of you would have certain picks (barring injury) already.

Obvious ones

Gary Ablett
Brett Goodes

For me

Shane Mumford

Brett Goodes is a rookie.

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:40 pm
by Alaska
Goodes will play but none are locks :? perhaps I am taking the bait, Cotchin, Vlastin and Rowe are locks! 8)

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:25 pm
by Rik E Boy
Dogmatic wrote:
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Most of you would have certain picks (barring injury) already.

Obvious ones

Gary Ablett
Brett Goodes

For me

Shane Mumford

Brett Goodes is a rookie.



My understanding is that the Dogs have an 'extra rookie' or something that they will be able to elevate regardless of LTIs and that player looks certain to be Brett Goodes.

regards,

REB

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:50 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Oliver Wines

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:57 am
by whufc
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Oliver Wines


I prefer Mitchell for the $40 000 less

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:20 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Mitchell from the Swans? Not sure if he is going to make round 1

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:21 am
by Brodlach
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Mitchell from the Swans? Not sure if he is going to make round 1


From Port but is still a rookie ATM. Had 28 touches yesterday

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:33 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Noticed that. You would think he will get promoted for sure.

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:44 am
by Smashed Crab
James Seller would be a lock for sure after man handling the Port backline yesterday....

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:46 am
by carey
Smashed Crab wrote:James Seller would be a lock for sure after man handling the Port backline yesterday....


What were the scores yesterday?

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:44 am
by whufc
Gary Ablett
Dan Currie

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:45 am
by whufc
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Mitchell from the Swans? Not sure if he is going to make round 1


Yeah the Port one!!

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:50 am
by Hondo
TSG I am interested in Mumford but I thought he was currently in the rehab group. Are you confident he will be fit for round 1?

Re: He is a LOCK

PostPosted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:28 am
by The Sleeping Giant
Should be right to go round 1.