SA Footy

Anyone considering their rookies (or rookie priced) players as keepers?

I think Lake may well end up as one, particularly with premium defenders being inconsistent scorers so far. Does the same go for Marty Clarke?

I'm beginning to think that Coniglio may well end up as a keeper, not as an M6, but as a very handy first emergency during the second half of the year.

Lake & Clarke arnt rookies.

Clarke was rookie priced. He's a keeper for me and at this stage Giles also

Bugg, Treloar, Morris, Fritz, Giles, Marty Clarke & Horsley all may well fit that category.

Hargrave, Bugg, Giles, Porpoise, and Redden and Smedts as they will not make any more money I will have to keep them.

Alaska wrote:Hargrave, Bugg, Giles, Porpoise, and Redden and Smedts as they will not make any more money I will have to keep them.

Smedts will go up.......................gradually.

Banker wrote:Lake & Clarke arnt rookies.

Rookie-priced.

Q. wrote:

Banker wrote:Lake & Clarke arnt rookies.

Rookie-priced.

I've been most impressed with Lake, I had faith in him when the doubters were out.

Perhaps the criteria can be players that started under $200K?

For players I have:

look like keepers - Clarke, Giles
possibles - Bugg, Coniglio, MacDonald (reliable number of games?)

GWS' rotation policy may kill Coniglio as a keeper

Hondo wrote:Perhaps the criteria can be players that started under $200K?

For players I have:

look like keepers - Clarke, Giles
possibles - Bugg, Coniglio, MacDonald (reliable number of games?)

GWS' rotation policy may kill Coniglio as a keeper

Valid point, I'm losing patience, now that they have a win on the board he's less likely to fill his playing role, I think he'll sit out and let the kids develop and only play if they have a large injury toll.

Kyal Horsley is looking like a keeper and a good 6th midfielder.