by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:28 pm
by Bum Crack » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:29 pm
by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:30 pm
Bum Crack wrote:is it a stupid idea to trade Nick Rieoldt out for Jack Riewoldt this week and then have that leftover coin to get rid of Ryder so I can bring back Cox next week? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
by macca26 » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:33 pm
OnSong wrote:Bum Crack wrote:is it a stupid idea to trade Nick Rieoldt out for Jack Riewoldt this week and then have that leftover coin to get rid of Ryder so I can bring back Cox next week? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Stupid.
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:35 pm
Bum Crack wrote:is it a stupid idea to trade Nick Rieoldt out for Jack Riewoldt this week and then have that leftover coin to get rid of Ryder so I can bring back Cox next week? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
by Bum Crack » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:42 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Bum Crack wrote:is it a stupid idea to trade Nick Rieoldt out for Jack Riewoldt this week and then have that leftover coin to get rid of Ryder so I can bring back Cox next week? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Very bad idea. You are burning two trades but not adding any keepers to your list. Buy low sell high...
Nick Riewoldt. Nope. The time is right to buy, not sell with Nick.
Jack. Yep. As above but you shouldn't do this by getting rid of St Nick or the money you make would only be replacing the money you have lost on St Nick.
Ryder. Not so sure of his price but he isn't going that badly is he? Not great against Collingwood but you don't drop premiums due to one bad game.
Cox. Nope. You've missed the boat. He was an obvious pre-season pick because he wasn't fit last year and he has been a consistent scorer over the journey. Too late now that he's averaging 120 plus another good score last night also.
Stick with Nick and Ryder. They'll come good. Milk your cash cows in a couple of weeks and then go for more premiums that way.
regards,
REB
by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:45 pm
by Swamp Donkey » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:45 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Bum Crack wrote:is it a stupid idea to trade Nick Rieoldt out for Jack Riewoldt this week and then have that leftover coin to get rid of Ryder so I can bring back Cox next week? Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Very bad idea. You are burning two trades but not adding any keepers to your list. Buy low sell high...
Nick Riewoldt. Nope. The time is right to buy, not sell with Nick.
Jack. Yep. As above but you shouldn't do this by getting rid of St Nick or the money you make would only be replacing the money you have lost on St Nick.
Ryder. Not so sure of his price but he isn't going that badly is he? Not great against Collingwood but you don't drop premiums due to one bad game.
Cox. Nope. You've missed the boat. He was an obvious pre-season pick because he wasn't fit last year and he has been a consistent scorer over the journey. Too late now that he's averaging 120 plus another good score last night also.
Stick with Nick and Ryder. They'll come good. Milk your cash cows in a couple of weeks and then go for more premiums that way.
regards,
REB
Sorry, it's Hill, not Ryder. I had Cox up until last week and traded him out. what a ******* cockhead **** i am
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:53 pm
OnSong wrote:Cracker is just playing us, surely. Known to have a solid SC record.
By the way BC, Hawthorn, Freo and Geelong have the bye this week!!!
by Bum Crack » Fri Apr 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:OnSong wrote:Cracker is just playing us, surely. Known to have a solid SC record.
By the way BC, Hawthorn, Freo and Geelong have the bye this week!!!
He must be taking the piss if he reckons he traded Coxy out.
regards,
REB
by Drop Bear » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:00 pm
by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:02 pm
Bum Crack wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:OnSong wrote:Cracker is just playing us, surely. Known to have a solid SC record.
By the way BC, Hawthorn, Freo and Geelong have the bye this week!!!
He must be taking the piss if he reckons he traded Coxy out.
regards,
REB
I did trade him out last week as I had him and Jamar and they both had the bye. I bought in Ryder and then went to trade ryder out for cox this week and had no coin, as I also traded out a bench ruckman for smith last week too and used the extra coin from the Cox trade to get smith in. Then, for some stupid reason, i bought in Hill for Ryder this week. Don't worry, I have been that frigging angry about it. I am not shitting you. As I said earlier, I think that one trade will cost me any chance I have of winning any leagues this year. I am stuffed.
by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:04 pm
Drop Bear wrote:Bum Crack omits on-fire Cox.
by CoverKing » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:06 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:07 pm
OnSong wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Bum Crack omits on-fire Cox.
Surprise as Bum Crack backs off stiff Cox
by Bum Crack » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:08 pm
OnSong wrote:Bum Crack wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:OnSong wrote:Cracker is just playing us, surely. Known to have a solid SC record.
By the way BC, Hawthorn, Freo and Geelong have the bye this week!!!
He must be taking the piss if he reckons he traded Coxy out.
regards,
REB
I did trade him out last week as I had him and Jamar and they both had the bye. I bought in Ryder and then went to trade ryder out for cox this week and had no coin, as I also traded out a bench ruckman for smith last week too and used the extra coin from the Cox trade to get smith in. Then, for some stupid reason, i bought in Hill for Ryder this week. Don't worry, I have been that frigging angry about it. I am not shitting you. As I said earlier, I think that one trade will cost me any chance I have of winning any leagues this year. I am stuffed.
Why did you do it though? It was a bye round anyway?
You do have Ryder BC, I just checked. But no Cox.
by Rik E Boy » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:16 pm
OnSong wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Bum Crack omits on-fire Cox.
Surprise as Bum Crack backs off stiff Cox
by OnSong » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:17 pm
White Line Fever wrote:OnSong wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Bum Crack omits on-fire Cox.
Surprise as Bum Crack backs off stiff Cox
Dick waiting on the sidelines for a recall to BumCracks side.
Sidebottom not impressed.
by Sorry Dude » Fri Apr 29, 2011 4:19 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:OnSong wrote:Drop Bear wrote:Bum Crack omits on-fire Cox.
Surprise as Bum Crack backs off stiff Cox
And now he's the butt of everyone's jokes
His humour has hit rock bottom
That was yet another wisecrack
regards,
REB
by LMA » Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:33 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |