Stock Aitken Waterman

Yes, music now has its very own forum!

Stock Aitken Waterman - they are...

Rubbish - I hate them
5
25%
They did produce some catchy stuff, but not much I'd buy
8
40%
Love them - they sum up the 80's well
3
15%
Who?
4
20%
 
Total votes : 20

Stock Aitken Waterman

Postby CK » Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:40 pm

Was out the other night at the Fringe and heard the dulcet tones of Rick Astley at one of the bars, and it got me thinking about SAW's prodigous output.

How do music fans judge them, overall? Producers of rubbish, or very underrated for their ability to write a catchy tune that, in a number of cases, still stands the test of time? Bearing in mind the likes of Astley, Kylie Minogue's earlier work, Bananarama, Mel and Kim and others; that they, as a songwriting and producing trio, were responsible for over 100 UK Top 40 hits alone and sales of over 40 million records - curious to hear the views of the panel on this one.
Can you guess where I'm calling from, the Las Vegas Hilton...
CK
Veteran
 
Posts: 3612
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 10:10 am
Location: At an SANFL game near you.
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 3 times

Re: Stock Aitken Waterman

Postby zipzap » Fri Mar 11, 2011 4:48 pm

Thought they were almost entirely rubbish. Early Kylie, Jason Donovan, Rick Astley, their work with Bananarama...mostly very badly dated Eurovision-by-numbers. Just because it's popular don't make it good! And don't be fooled that everything they touched turned to gold - for every Rick Astley there were ten Blakeney Twins or Sybils. Mind you, Mel and Kim were a bit of a guilty pleasure!

BUT... when they strayed from their customary sound and (verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge-chorus-to-fade) formula they were more than capable of some good work. Youthquake by Dead or Alive was very un-SAW sounding and their finest moment by far (Pseudo, back me up here). When Kylie finally stretched her wings with Better the Devil You Know (still her best song I reckon) and the Rhythm of Life album it showed they weren't one trick ponies.

So, for me, they were talented guys who rocked when they used their powers for good instead of evil. :)
"A no vote from any club means there is some sort of risk involved in our entry into the competition not working," Steven Trigg.
User avatar
zipzap
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: Bluebird Bakery
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 39 times

Re: Stock Aitken Waterman

Postby Pseudo » Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:52 pm

zipzap wrote:Youthquake by Dead or Alive was very un-SAW sounding and their finest moment by far (Pseudo, back me up here).


What he said. Youthquake is Audio Gold. I have rated that album with 4.5 stars (out of 5) on rateyourmusic.com. The followup (Mad Bad And Dangerous To Know) was a bit of a letdown. Only one real good track on it. 2.5 stars.

Didn't mind some of the other SAW efforts. Formulaic and mass-market produced doesn't always mean bad. I liked the earlier Bananarama efforts, particularly the 12" version of Venus.

To my mind SAW's lowest point was this piece of sh!t:

Image
Clowns OUT. Smears OUT. RESIST THE OCCUPATION.
User avatar
Pseudo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12264
Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2005 11:11 am
Location: enculez-vous
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1657 times
Grassroots Team: Marion

Re: Stock Aitken Waterman

Postby southee » Sat Mar 12, 2011 12:57 am

Image

Not one of SAW's best moments. :oops:

I despised them. I was into metal music at the time (school days).

Played it at the school socials and gave me the s**ts!!!! Awful stuff......
Is out of change.....thanks Cambridge Clarrie!!!
User avatar
southee
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4961
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:00 am
Location: Somewhere in the jungle!!!
Has liked: 870 times
Been liked: 124 times

Re: Stock Aitken Waterman

Postby Barto » Fri Mar 18, 2011 10:23 pm

Pseudo wrote:
zipzap wrote:Youthquake by Dead or Alive was very un-SAW sounding and their finest moment by far (Pseudo, back me up here).


What he said. Youthquake is Audio Gold. I have rated that album with 4.5 stars (out of 5) on rateyourmusic.com. The followup (Mad Bad And Dangerous To Know) was a bit of a letdown. Only one real good track on it. 2.5 stars.

Didn't mind some of the other SAW efforts. Formulaic and mass-market produced doesn't always mean bad. I liked the earlier Bananarama efforts, particularly the 12" version of Venus.

To my mind SAW's lowest point was this piece of sh!t:

Image


Quoted for truth.

SAW created typical cookie cutter formulaic pop songs, like many other song writing teams such as Chin/Chapman in the 70s but people buy it, music company execs get filthy rich, the 'artists' usually end up dead from drugs/booze or living like hobos but at the end of the day, people who were teenagers when these songs were out have their hits and memories.
It's all the SANFL's fault.
User avatar
Barto
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:40 pm
Location: Fremantle
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 6 times


Board index   General Talk  Music

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |