by White Line Fever » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:37 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:42 pm
by frenzy » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:49 pm
White Line Fever wrote:This is a big issue.
What do we think is appropriate?
I think Fine only.
by Down the Hill » Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:53 pm
by Pommy Git » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:00 pm
frenzy wrote:White Line Fever wrote:This is a big issue.
What do we think is appropriate?
I think Fine only.
If the SFL are so adamdant about their rules perhaps they should read their OWN constitution.
[b]Clubs playing unqualified players in Finals $1,500 Team will bedisqualified from taking further part Refer
SFL Const Re g 10 Part 3.ii) Min Fine. in the F inals Series. Referred to:- Invest igations Committee.[/b]
As this was not actually discovered until after the series - surely a fine is all that can be imposed?
by vics01 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:11 pm
JUNIORS
i) To be eligible to play in the f inals of an age group, a play er sha ll have played six ( 6) matches in
that age group, wi th that club dur ing the season, in e ither or both the Saturday or Sunday
competit ion – this excl udes t he 10 nom inated Saturday pl ayers, who wi ll be ineligible to play
Sunday competit ion in their age group after th e nom inated round s pecif ied by the Board of
Directors each year. This doe s not preclude a ju nior player from p laying in a h igher grade.
ii) Junior player/s can onl y play for either th eir S.F. L. Club or a SANFL Club at U nder
16’s or a higher level, on any given weekend
iii) A Saturday junior age group pla yer will be ineligible to play in finals of the Sunday
Competition if the player plays more tha n the st ipulated number of matches (10) in the Saturday
competit ion.
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:29 pm
Down the Hill wrote:I'm the other. I vote we tar and feather the SFL official who looks like Hagrid from Harry Potter.
by AFLflyer » Fri Sep 24, 2010 1:59 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Down the Hill wrote:I'm the other. I vote we tar and feather the SFL official who looks like Hagrid from Harry Potter.
As I have heard it, he was the one giving advice on player qualification only to turn around and point it out to the league... must be some sour grapes down at Reynella.
by pale ale » Fri Sep 24, 2010 4:20 pm
by recruiter 10 » Fri Sep 24, 2010 6:12 pm
Zelezny Chucks wrote:Down the Hill wrote:I'm the other. I vote we tar and feather the SFL official who looks like Hagrid from Harry Potter.
As I have heard it, he was the one giving advice on player qualification only to turn around and point it out to the league... must be some sour grapes down at Reynella.
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Fri Sep 24, 2010 7:09 pm
recruiter 10 wrote:Zelezny Chucks wrote:Down the Hill wrote:I'm the other. I vote we tar and feather the SFL official who looks like Hagrid from Harry Potter.
As I have heard it, he was the one giving advice on player qualification only to turn around and point it out to the league... must be some sour grapes down at Reynella.
Was he X m/vale
by A Mum » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:33 pm
White Line Fever wrote:This is a big issue regarding the qualification of an MV U18 player in last weeks GF.
After playing all year at MVFC (in senior grades bar 3 U18 games) the SFL have decided to strip MV of their premiership.
What do we think is appropriate?
I think Fine only.
by White Line Fever » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:41 pm
A Mum wrote:White Line Fever wrote:This is a big issue regarding the qualification of an MV U18 player in last weeks GF.
After playing all year at MVFC (in senior grades bar 3 U18 games) the SFL have decided to strip MV of their premiership.
What do we think is appropriate?
I think Fine only.
What would have made him 'qualified'
Obviously not 3 games?
Surely the club realised that he was not qualified?
by A Mum » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:47 pm
by White Line Fever » Fri Sep 24, 2010 8:49 pm
by Wedgie » Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:56 am
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by the big bang » Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:43 pm
A Mum wrote:Okay - thanks WLF.
Well if it's a clerical error as opposed to 'cheating' that's very harsh taking away the whole premiership![]()
Got to feel for the 'kids' really.
So I'm guessing the paperwork says 3 games, but he actually physically played more in U18?
by 85 WAS A GOOD YEAR » Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:52 pm
by spot on » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:31 pm
85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:Letter has been forwarded to club Secretaries that the SFL Investigations Committee has met and decision has been made.
The SFL have officially requested Morphett Vale FC return all Premiership items to the league, and the Premiership Title for 2010 has been awarded to Cove FC.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |