I've heard being in stressful positions can help with weight-loss.
Maybe he's feeling the pinch?[/quote]
Youd know about stressfull possies Z.C by the way you post you'd definately be a receiver


by fly » Sat Jun 07, 2008 4:28 pm
by petoe » Sat Jun 07, 2008 7:38 pm
by Backliner » Sat Jun 07, 2008 8:17 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Sat Jun 07, 2008 9:46 pm
fly wrote:Zelezny Chucks wrote:efc wrote:He should be appluaded for losing the weight he has. 50kg plus. use your brains for a change you lot.
I've heard being in stressful positions can help with weight-loss.
Maybe he's feeling the pinch?
Youd know about stressfull possies Z.C by the way you post you'd definately be a receiver![]()
by Waterboy » Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:10 am
Backliner wrote:Who were the better players for the SFL? All grades if anyone knows please
by Bag The Points » Sun Jun 08, 2008 12:47 am
by Sponge Bob » Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:52 am
Waterboy wrote:Backliner wrote:Who were the better players for the SFL? All grades if anyone knows please
Under 15s - SFL came from behind to tie it up with a couple of minutes to go, but amateurs kicked a couple of quick goals from there
Seniors - amateurs won the 2nd quarter by about 7 goals. Other 3 quarters were a lot closer. SFL lost the rucks and the centre clearances nearly all day. Joel Campbell from Gepps Cross easily best on ground for amateurs
Amateurs picked McKenzie as best player for SFL.
by Backliner » Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:42 am
by pale ale » Sun Jun 08, 2008 6:35 pm
Shake 'n Bake wrote:Thought ive have a crack at what the association side would look like with all players and fully fit any thoughts
Pollard McKeough N Bayly
B Bayly McKenzie Ramsay
Kettle Moore M Reavill
Manhood Weidermann Bradshaw
Smith Tedmanson Heath
1st
Squire
Vick
Johnstone
Int
Gill/Short/Brookman
King, Simper, D Reavill, Earl, A Hill, Wood Sure there are more ive missed
by the observer » Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:42 pm
by Waterboy » Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:53 pm
pale ale wrote:
I went and watched the game at Theby oval - bloody big oval and the Ameteurs were big fit and well drilled and smashed us in the midfield but to Southerns credit they really had a real go in the second half and were competative.
Was suprised of the form of young Browny from Christies and Curyer from Lonsdale - they go ok.
by jake the snake » Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:43 am
by Backliner » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:20 am
the observer wrote:Just for interest backliner B.Veide 2 Mail medals plyed in a premiership at Port Noarlunga and more importantly Jake is playing good A grade football for the cockledivers
by tatts » Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:12 am
jake the snake wrote:let me get this right....the saafl under 23s beat the sfl open age team by 72 points...
hahaha at anyone who thinks the sfl level is anywhere near saafl div one...
saafl open age team would beat the trash the sfl served up yesterday by 30 goals
by Shake 'n Bake » Mon Jun 09, 2008 11:00 am
by comeon » Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:22 pm
by The Big Shrek » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:08 pm
tatts wrote:jake the snake wrote:let me get this right....the saafl under 23s beat the sfl open age team by 72 points...
hahaha at anyone who thinks the sfl level is anywhere near saafl div one...
saafl open age team would beat the trash the sfl served up yesterday by 30 goals
Im pretty sure the average age of the SFL team was under 23.This league has plenty of good players who are older than 23
and that if we played an open age game we would also be very competative,I think this happened the 1st time we played this format 4 years ago and we won by about 5 goals.So to say that they would trash us is rubbish.Your u18 team have only beaten us once in the 3 times that we have played which i think is poor when you consider how many teams you have to pick from.
by Bag The Points » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:27 pm
by cyclops » Mon Jun 09, 2008 1:30 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |