Re: Southern Football League
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2017 12:49 pm
Onto this weekend of Prelim's, if results go the way of the favourite's in each grade we will have only 3 clubs represented across the 5 games on GF day.
Dutchy wrote:Onto this weekend of Prelim's, if results go the way of the favourite's in each grade we will have only 3 clubs represented across the 5 games on GF day.
Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
Dutchy wrote:Dunno, was impressed with the Shoe's 13's last week.
Wilbur wrote:Demon fan wrote:Interested in people's thoughts so who is at fault,
Porties who claimed to have ask if OK to play but clearly did the wrong thing on 5/08, SFL for not picking it up prior to game or MVale for asking the question?
You're surely joking. Port Noarlunga 100% at fault.
King wrote:Front & Centre wrote:Anyone care to confirm if their club is not looking for a new coach next year? Numbers seem to be growing
Names of candidates being mentioned include Mitch Portlock, Justin Calderbank, Trent Mills, Marty Clifton, Ben Porter, Matt Golding with Mr Crate being asked to take the helm at CB. Care to confirm LGIL?
Don't know Mitty's plans for next year ........ bit premature with a GF on Saturday week, but if he needs an enticement to stay, l'll marry his daughter!!!!
Oldman Munga wrote:Just heard Lonsdale have voted 40-5 in favour of leaving the SFL ,can someone from within confirm
King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
shoe boy wrote:King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
How many Prelims have you played and what grade ?
King wrote:shoe boy wrote:King wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
How many Prelims have you played and what grade ?
SB, I could quote all kinds of amazing stats relating to my footy career and you would have no idea if they were true or not. However I will not do that simply as it is totally irrelevant to my original post. If you thought the two prelims were good games, so be it; I didn't.
A-Grade was quite physical earlier in the game, Morphett Vale looked spent in the second halfKing wrote:Two fairly ordinary games today in the SFL A & B grade prelims. Hope the standard, both footy ability and physically, rise for next week's GF's.
Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
Dutchy wrote:Front & Centre wrote:Interesting situation with the U16s girls competition Grand Final.
Christies Beach played unqualified players and Happy Valley had unqualified players on teamsheet without a number next to their name who did not play. League investigating and apparently want to call it a no result grand final.
Surely one of these offences where the girls actually played is worse than leaving a name on the teamsheet without a number next to their name which apparently was given the OK but SFL representative on the day.
I heard the rule is if CB are found guilty, their score gets wiped like Porties did, however the issue is HV didn't score so makes it a 0-0 result!!!!
Surely it wouldn't take long for the SFL to oversee the team sheets say 24 hours before each final to confirm eligibility? would save a lot of these issues.