

by the wonder elephant » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:40 am
by Hasbeen » Thu Jun 21, 2007 1:40 pm
by The Girth » Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:44 pm
the wonder elephant wrote:how did the wolverine go on sat and whats his form like girth ?i ran in to him at hahndorf on sat morning said hes playing a grade and is pretty fit![]()
hhow are your other blackwood lads going ?
by Swooper16 » Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:57 pm
by Tight_Lines » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:12 pm
Swooper16 wrote:How long would you give a club Tightlines? Both Morphettville Park and & Hackham have been going backwards each season for the last 5-7 years. Now its got to the point where Hackham are losing to mid table sides by 60+ goals. Wouldnt it be more beneficial to the league if we could attract 2 competitive clubs to replace these 2. If hackham still wish to be represented then they could field a C grade side - and wouldnt they rather have one competitive outfit rather then 2 laughing stocks for sides?
I dont support 2 Divs either - a club like Cove has shown that with a bit effort it is possible to be a respected competitive unit in the SFL. The issue i and i think many others have is that there are teams that are not improving and basically wasting everyones time. You've talked about how good A1 competition is and basically how it sh*ts over SFL. How can the SFL look to gain outside (and inside) respect if we continue tolerating clubs that are only going backwards, especially if we are given the chance to add stronger clubs in our area to the comp?
by WHEELS&DEALS » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:16 pm
Swooper16 wrote:How long would you give a club Tightlines? Both Morphettville Park and & Hackham have been going backwards each season for the last 5-7 years. Now its got to the point where Hackham are losing to mid table sides by 60+ goals. Wouldnt it be more beneficial to the league if we could attract 2 competitive clubs to replace these 2. If hackham still wish to be represented then they could field a C grade side - and wouldnt they rather have one competitive outfit rather then 2 laughing stocks for sides?
I dont support 2 Divs either - a club like Cove has shown that with a bit effort it is possible to be a respected competitive unit in the SFL. The issue i and i think many others have is that there are teams that are not improving and basically wasting everyones time. You've talked about how good A1 competition is and basically how it sh*ts over SFL. How can the SFL look to gain outside (and inside) respect if we continue tolerating clubs that are only going backwards, especially if we are given the chance to add stronger clubs in our area to the comp?
by The Girth » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:40 pm
the wonder elephant wrote:how did the wolverine go on sat and whats his form like girth ?i ran in to him at hahndorf on sat morning said hes playing a grade and is pretty fit![]()
hhow are your other blackwood lads going ?
by mrf » Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:45 pm
by Swooper16 » Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:56 pm
mrf wrote:What are opinions of each clubs top 3 players throughout the whole league
by The Gimp » Thu Jun 21, 2007 4:59 pm
Swooper16 wrote:mrf wrote:What are opinions of each clubs top 3 players throughout the whole league
I know for a fact that Scott Pollard is against the war in Iraq.
by WHEELS&DEALS » Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:12 pm
Swooper16 wrote:mrf wrote:What are opinions of each clubs top 3 players throughout the whole league
I know for a fact that Scott Pollard is against the war in Iraq.
by Jayne » Thu Jun 21, 2007 5:20 pm
Swooper16 wrote:mrf wrote:What are opinions of each clubs top 3 players throughout the whole league
I know for a fact that Scott Pollard is against the war in Iraq.
by sportsfan » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:09 pm
WHEELS&DEALS wrote:Swooper16 wrote:How long would you give a club Tightlines? Both Morphettville Park and & Hackham have been going backwards each season for the last 5-7 years. Now its got to the point where Hackham are losing to mid table sides by 60+ goals. Wouldnt it be more beneficial to the league if we could attract 2 competitive clubs to replace these 2. If hackham still wish to be represented then they could field a C grade side - and wouldnt they rather have one competitive outfit rather then 2 laughing stocks for sides?
I dont support 2 Divs either - a club like Cove has shown that with a bit effort it is possible to be a respected competitive unit in the SFL. The issue i and i think many others have is that there are teams that are not improving and basically wasting everyones time. You've talked about how good A1 competition is and basically how it sh*ts over SFL. How can the SFL look to gain outside (and inside) respect if we continue tolerating clubs that are only going backwards, especially if we are given the chance to add stronger clubs in our area to the comp?
Cove have just been lucky that the area they are in has had a population boom and they have reaped the benifits. It was only 3 or 4 years ago Morphie parks made the finals
by footy nut » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:36 pm
by Numbers » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:36 pm
by comeon » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:54 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Fri Jun 22, 2007 1:03 am
FootyMad wrote:Personally I think your all dreaming - McLaren Vale are not going anywhere.
The topic of going back to 2 divisions for the SFL has been done to death with almost all involved defending the current concept. In previous posts (even started a thread for it) I put the notion of two divisions in the SFL and the benefits to which the diehards said it wont happen.
by bay boy » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:21 am
by Junior » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:30 am
bay boy wrote:what was the Lonsdale/Marion score on sat ?
by The Mexican » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:39 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |