by vics01 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:30 am
by fiftympenalty » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:34 am
by vics01 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:39 am
by MatteeG » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:11 pm
Esteban Vihaio wrote:85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:What do you want us to say EV?
Nobody likes to see or hear about a player seriously injured playing sport.
I was on far side of oval so didn't see it happen, just the player being assisted off.
Nobody from Flaggies defended our player on the day, or in here
It happened down the far end away from the majority of spectators. As posters can't give any further info, we aren't really in a position to say anything worthwhile.
Once the outcome of the tribunal is known, and our delegate provides information to them, the club will respond to our members.
outcome is now known. Looking forward to you response
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by mrp2626 » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:22 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Sep 10, 2014 1:46 pm
fiftympenalty wrote:What a piss weak effort by the league. Gotta do what's necessary to stamp these disgusting acts out of the game, which they did not. Also the offender is an absolute loser. Only benefit I can see of him not getting a life ban is that the porties boys will have a chance to hurt him back next time they meet. Such a poor penalty handed out by the league is to blame for any forthcoming retaliation. And boy do I hope there is some severe retaliation because the victims life is essentially ruined
by Leo » Wed Sep 10, 2014 2:03 pm
by Spangy » Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:03 pm
by Look Good In Leather » Wed Sep 10, 2014 6:39 pm
Spangy wrote:Just another reason why the SFL competition sucks & other leagues around it are far better quality & more competitive.. All I can say as being a SFL player for 10 years in the competition, I wished I left it earlier to join another league...
by Down the Hill » Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:30 pm
Spangy wrote:Just another reason why the SFL competition sucks & other leagues around it are far better quality & more competitive.. All I can say as being a SFL player for 10 years in the competition, I wished I left it earlier to join another league...
by Mister Footy » Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:20 pm
by jet-airport » Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:12 pm
by Front & Centre » Fri Sep 12, 2014 6:23 pm
by Esteban Vihaio » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:08 pm
MatteeG wrote:Esteban Vihaio wrote:85 WAS A GOOD YEAR wrote:What do you want us to say EV?
Nobody likes to see or hear about a player seriously injured playing sport.
I was on far side of oval so didn't see it happen, just the player being assisted off.
Nobody from Flaggies defended our player on the day, or in here
It happened down the far end away from the majority of spectators. As posters can't give any further info, we aren't really in a position to say anything worthwhile.
Once the outcome of the tribunal is known, and our delegate provides information to them, the club will respond to our members.
outcome is now known. Looking forward to you response
I wasn't at the game EV, but from what I have heard it is a big black mark against our player. I'm sure as a club we will work out the best course of action going forward.
5 weeks suspension seems vastly inadequate assuming the damage to the lad is accurate as reported on here. Hoping our world leading medical folk can get him as close as possible to a full recovery.
Once again we are shown how much damage can be done with one punch. It cant be stressed enough.
by Esteban Vihaio » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:09 pm
Leo wrote:For as long as I have been involved in the SFL as a player, coach, etc (about 26 years), they have never once shown any intent to deter high grade, on field violence. By High grade, I mean behind play, pre meditated, coward punches that have no place at all in our game. As long as this is the case, we will continue to see ugly incidents blighting the game. A former SFL player was last week suspended in the AAFL league for a total of 32 matches for various offences, thus resulting in a life ban because he has gone over the 16 game threshold. Kudos to that league for getting rid of someone that has no place on a football field. At this rate, the offending player here can do this another 2 times and still be allowed to play football. What do you think the result would be if the victim was a child of someone on the tribunal panel?? In any legal system, there is right to appeal. Surely there is a way that the clubs can appeal this decision citing it as manifestly inadequate? Or is it just another case of "What we say is final?" by the league. If it is allowed to be swept under the carpet, then we will be here again in less than 12 months talking about another tragic circumstance involving a young innocent footballer. Shame on the SFL.
by Keyser Soze » Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:54 pm
Look Good In Leather wrote:fiftympenalty wrote:What a piss weak effort by the league. Gotta do what's necessary to stamp these disgusting acts out of the game, which they did not. Also the offender is an absolute loser. Only benefit I can see of him not getting a life ban is that the porties boys will have a chance to hurt him back next time they meet. Such a poor penalty handed out by the league is to blame for any forthcoming retaliation. And boy do I hope there is some severe retaliation because the victims life is essentially ruined
Do we know who the commissioners hearing it were?
by Down the Hill » Sun Sep 14, 2014 11:05 pm
by shoe boy » Mon Sep 15, 2014 8:53 am
by vics01 » Mon Sep 15, 2014 9:46 am
by shoe boy » Mon Sep 15, 2014 10:28 am
vics01 wrote:SB
I reckon the shoes will win with the most points..
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |