by AFLflyer » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:19 pm
by fly » Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:37 pm
by MatteeG » Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:50 pm
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by magic » Thu Sep 20, 2007 1:22 am
AFLflyer wrote:Panther man your exactly right - except for the fact that most of the people jumping on RFC's back are the EMU's. Reading back these idiots (mexican, spike, lova, dutchy and especially rock and more) really do have NFI. How would their club react when told there may be a chance they have to suit up on the weekend - knowing they were clearly not good enough on the weekend. You think they dont know they deserve not to be there??
these idiots on the forum (making each other feel good - patting each other on the back) really have no idea of the full circumstances. shame on you blokes. Your reaction has been terrible, a discrace. It seems Reynella are being made the villans, where they really have no control in the SFL decision.
think about it ..........lemmings!!!!
by efc » Thu Sep 20, 2007 8:40 am
by BIG RED DELICIOUS » Thu Sep 20, 2007 9:45 am
efc wrote:this is how it happened. phos not happy with francis taking a required player. Do not clear him and is told he is a required player. Nothing more happens then they here about him playing at brighton. They sit on it till they can do the most damage.They inform Reynella officals after Sundays results.Of course they start to enquire.Find out there is no paper work for his clearance.Al hell breakes lose.SFL start thinking , the player played in our league side and then the interleague side what a stuff up. Paperwork starts to appear but no PHOS football director or coach or presidents signature appears on it.Reynella to train Thursday night and there is a meeting at 7.30 Thursday night to decide the outcome.Looks to me like if precidents hold REYNELLA vs MORPHETT VALE GRAND FINAL
by The Mexican » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:06 am
AFLflyer wrote:Panther man your exactly right - except for the fact that most of the people jumping on RFC's back are the EMU's. Reading back these idiots (mexican, spike, lova, dutchy and especially rock and more) really do have NFI. How would their club react when told there may be a chance they have to suit up on the weekend - knowing they were clearly not good enough on the weekend. You think they dont know they deserve not to be there??
these idiots on the forum (making each other feel good - patting each other on the back) really have no idea of the full circumstances. shame on you blokes. Your reaction has been terrible, a discrace. It seems Reynella are being made the villans, where they really have no control in the SFL decision.
think about it ..........lemmings!!!!
by LaughingKookaburra » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:15 am
by Swooper16 » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:19 am
AFLflyer wrote:Panther man your exactly right - except for the fact that most of the people jumping on RFC's back are the EMU's. Reading back these idiots (mexican, spike, lova, dutchy and especially rock and more) really do have NFI. How would their club react when told there may be a chance they have to suit up on the weekend - knowing they were clearly not good enough on the weekend. You think they dont know they deserve not to be there??
these idiots on the forum (making each other feel good - patting each other on the back) really have no idea of the full circumstances. shame on you blokes. Your reaction has been terrible, a discrace. It seems Reynella are being made the villans, where they really have no control in the SFL decision.
think about it ..........lemmings!!!!
by AFLflyer » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:22 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Sounds like the player is Ash Simper,a former PHOS Camden junior/senior player. Does this mean if the SFL over turns the decision they will have to cough up both Association and District sheilds? Not likely, they will throw it out because it will cause chaos if they over turn it.All comes down to money, if the game is over turned the GF will not go ahead this Saturday as planned.The SFL paid good coin to hire the ground this week and if the game is over turned they will have to hire it another weekend and the SFL does not have the coin to do so.
Also AFLFLYER I beleive there is a distinct difference to playing an un-registered player for a game or 2 and then getting found out,that my friend is cheating and yes should be dealt with at the full force of the leagues powers. But having a player who has played for at least a year and in the leagues association/ district sides the league would have to have a moral obligation to over look this instance and (A) review their clearance policy, (B) ensure this never happens again....Don't get the wires crossed,there is a difference between deliberate cheating and being the target of a smear campaign by jelous counterparts...........
by AFLflyer » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:27 am
The Mexican wrote:AFLflyer wrote:Panther man your exactly right - except for the fact that most of the people jumping on RFC's back are the EMU's. Reading back these idiots (mexican, spike, lova, dutchy and especially rock and more) really do have NFI. How would their club react when told there may be a chance they have to suit up on the weekend - knowing they were clearly not good enough on the weekend. You think they dont know they deserve not to be there??
these idiots on the forum (making each other feel good - patting each other on the back) really have no idea of the full circumstances. shame on you blokes. Your reaction has been terrible, a discrace. It seems Reynella are being made the villans, where they really have no control in the SFL decision.
think about it ..........lemmings!!!!
Flyer you are the one with no idea along with your back slapping "whistle blowers"... I can only speak from a MV perspective but I can 100% assure you that the Morphett Vale FC would not embarrass themselves in this manner. Answer me this did the player in question play for Brighton last year... YES... Case closed... Why bring this matter up on GF eve..?? The way Reynella have acted on this matter is beyond comprehension, we live by a few simple motto's down at Emu land, one being, work hard and the rewards will come... Perhaps if the Reynella players worked a little harder they wouldn't have to go down the line of technicalities to reach a GF by DEFAULT... There are 21 A graders that would not want to play in a GF under these circumstances from down at wheatsheaf road... FACT... Such a proud bunch of blokes who take extreme pride in their performance. I am sure it will be of no loss to Reynella that i will never have a beer in their club or purchase anything that club has to offer the 1 time a year i visit that oval... Hopefully some other teams follow suit... Poor form on this one Winefly's...
by The Lova » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:29 am
LaughingKookaburra wrote:Sounds like the player is Ash Simper,a former PHOS Camden junior/senior player. Does this mean if the SFL over turns the decision they will have to cough up both Association and District sheilds? Not likely, they will throw it out because it will cause chaos if they over turn it.All comes down to money, if the game is over turned the GF will not go ahead this Saturday as planned.The SFL paid good coin to hire the ground this week and if the game is over turned they will have to hire it another weekend and the SFL does not have the coin to do so.
Also AFLFLYER I beleive there is a distinct difference to playing an un-registered player for a game or 2 and then getting found out,that my friend is cheating and yes should be dealt with at the full force of the leagues powers. But having a player who has played for at least a year and in the leagues association/ district sides the league would have to have a moral obligation to over look this instance and (A) review their clearance policy, (B) ensure this never happens again....Don't get the wires crossed,there is a difference between deliberate cheating and being the target of a smear campaign by jelous counterparts...........
by The Dutchman » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:31 am
by LaughingKookaburra » Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:50 am
by On The Ball » Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:18 pm
by bandar » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:15 pm
efc wrote:this is how it happened. phos not happy with francis taking a required player. Do not clear him and is told he is a required player. Nothing more happens then they here about him playing at brighton. They sit on it till they can do the most damage.They inform Reynella officals after Sundays results.Of course they start to enquire.Find out there is no paper work for his clearance.Al hell breakes lose.SFL start thinking , the player played in our league side and then the interleague side what a stuff up. Paperwork starts to appear but no PHOS football director or coach or presidents signature appears on it.Reynella to train Thursday night and there is a meeting at 7.30 Thursday night to decide the outcome.Looks to me like if precidents hold REYNELLA vs MORPHETT VALE GRAND FINAL
by bandar » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:19 pm
AFLflyer wrote:LaughingKookaburra wrote:Sounds like the player is Ash Simper,a former PHOS Camden junior/senior player. Does this mean if the SFL over turns the decision they will have to cough up both Association and District sheilds? Not likely, they will throw it out because it will cause chaos if they over turn it.All comes down to money, if the game is over turned the GF will not go ahead this Saturday as planned.The SFL paid good coin to hire the ground this week and if the game is over turned they will have to hire it another weekend and the SFL does not have the coin to do so.
Also AFLFLYER I beleive there is a distinct difference to playing an un-registered player for a game or 2 and then getting found out,that my friend is cheating and yes should be dealt with at the full force of the leagues powers. But having a player who has played for at least a year and in the leagues association/ district sides the league would have to have a moral obligation to over look this instance and (A) review their clearance policy, (B) ensure this never happens again....Don't get the wires crossed,there is a difference between deliberate cheating and being the target of a smear campaign by jelous counterparts...........
for the record mate - i agree. "the jelous counterparts in this situation are PHOS - simple"
by The Mexican » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:56 pm
by pelican » Thu Sep 20, 2007 3:59 pm
fly wrote:Finally a bit of common sence written here good on you flyer,what would the hierachy of there clubs done given the same circumstances???Exactly the same course of action I would think.R.F.C. has taken.We are not the whistleblower in this just carrying the message as the club concerned in this did last year,quite frankly it is a big mess the whole thing and Reynella should not be ridiculed for a course of action any club in the S.F.L would have taken including the prescious untouchable Emus.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |