by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:45 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:21 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:36 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:42 pm
by johntheclaret » Sat Aug 08, 2009 11:51 pm
by johntheclaret » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:01 am
by Bully » Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:29 pm
by johntheclaret » Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:37 pm
by Pidge » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:07 pm
johntheclaret wrote:I thought I would kick the thread off with a story of idiocracy at it's finest.
the story is a bout SPL side Livingston, who got themselves into financial difficulty, and of course the policy of the powers that be, around these parets, is to "reward" clubs in trouble with a points deduction. So not only do they get relegated, losing crowd, advertising and TV revenue, but they get stuck with a minus points tally for the start of the coming season.
Now you might think that that is idiocracy in itself, but that isn't the story. Noooo.
So back to the tale. No only do Livingston suffer relegation from the SPl, but they are relegated two further divisions into division 3. To keep the equilibrium, Airdrie ae promoted to the 1st division as Livingstons replacements, not because Airdrie won promotion, because they didn't, but to make up the numbers after the departure of Livingston. And Cowdenbeath were promoted to the 2nd division to replace Airdrie.
Are you still with me? Good
Now plucky Livingston are made of sterner stuff and, not being ones to take this injustice lying down launch an appeal against the decision, but this appeal won't be heard until after the start of the league season this week end and thus, thier first game has been postponed pending the outcome of thier appeal. In the meantime, Aridrie and Cowdenbeath's respective games will go ahead.
Still with me?? Good
Now if Livingston are successful with thier appeal, they will be re-instated to the 1st division which means Airdrie will have to drop back to the 2nd division and Cowdenbeath will have to drop back to the 3rd division even though both sides will have played thier first games. The SFA's solution to this is to void the games both sides have played. OK this makes sense but has anyone considered the cost and effort gone into publishing fixtures, etc, and the cost to the fans for attending what could be pointless matches, not to mention all the other costs, steward, policing etc.
Are you still with me ??? Well I'm glad you are, because none of this makes sense to me and i'm writing the bloody story
by johntheclaret » Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:46 pm
by Il Duce » Mon Aug 10, 2009 1:57 am
This is the name of the rivalry between Celtic and Rangers both of Glasgow in Scotland. The two are Scotlands biggest two clubs in every way. They have won the most tropheys between them, they earn the most money (Reports estimate that Rangers and Celtic to be worth £120 million (1/5th) to the Scottish economy) , the have the biggest two staduims and biggest two amount of supporters all over Glasgow and Scotland and fairly big world wide fan base.
by johntheclaret » Tue Aug 11, 2009 6:51 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:38 pm
by Bully » Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:08 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Aug 16, 2009 5:26 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:33 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:05 am
by johntheclaret » Sun Sep 20, 2009 8:16 am
by johntheclaret » Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:00 am
by mighty_tiger_79 » Mon Sep 21, 2009 6:55 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |