Page 1 of 3

Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:08 pm
by Sky Pilot
Surely the Olympic DNA is all about track and field, swimming, diving, gymnastics, archery, shooting, rowing, cycling, equestrian blah blah. Surely mainstream high profile professional sports like tennis, soccer, basketball etc are not compatible with the longstanding Olympic spirit. Anyone else agree? What sports do you think should be in or out?

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:23 pm
by OnSong
Why is golf not an olympic sport, if the others are?

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:24 pm
by Squids
It's meant to be the best of the best. That's why I would kick soccer out quick smart. Basketball and Tennis are okay as they usually have the best players playing.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:35 pm
by heater31
Some sections of the road/track cycling disciplines want BMX & Mountain Bikes out.

I would like to see golf in but for the amateurs only. Would be a good launching pad to turn professional.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:55 pm
by smac
If it isn't the pinnacle of your sport to win Olympic medals then it shouldn't be in the Olympics.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:06 pm
by David Brent
OnSong wrote:Why is golf not an olympic sport, if the others are?


Its in for Rio I think not 100% certain though.

One could argue with tennis the doubles crown is the most prestigious to win as you get the good players like Fed, Murray in the event compared to Grand Slams where only the spuds play like the Gooch from Aus.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:36 pm
by Jimmy_041
It all went pear shaped when the line between professionalism and amateurism disappeared.
The Olympics was the pinnacle of amateurism

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:40 pm
by gadj1976
smac wrote:If it isn't the pinnacle of your sport to win Olympic medals then it shouldn't be in the Olympics.


100% agree Smac. That should be the criteria. In order it should be Nationals, World Champs then Olympics.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:24 pm
by Sky Pilot
[quote="heater31"]Some sections of the road/track cycling disciplines want BMX & Mountain Bikes out.

I would like to see golf in but for the amateurs only. Would be a good launching pad to turn professional.[/quote]
spot on! But watch vested interests interfere here and get their way.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:00 pm
by Grahaml
Banning people because they make money out of what they do is the stupidest idea I've heard for some time. Why award an olympic gold medal to a guy who happens to be the 900th best player in the world, but the 899 ahead of him are professionals? If you're going to have something in the olympics then it should be open to the best in the world.

I suspect anyone who suggests banning professionals has utterly no idea how many people make a living for their sports. You don't see Pearsons, Bolt, Phelps working 9-5 because they get paid to be athletes. After Seoul it became very clear when Carl Lewis had just become one of the highest paid US athletes while NBA basketballers were unable to compete because of their professional status.

Soccer shouldn't be in the olympics, it's not the highest level and not open to the best players. It's a B grade event for soccer and the olympics should never be allowed to be B grade.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:27 pm
by heater31
But why should the professionals make even more money than they already do. Being an Olympic medalist is only going to increase their value further.

Amateur golfers only have about 2 major championships that they can win and under the amateur satus outlined in the rules of golf can accept almost nothing for it.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:31 pm
by Jim05
Grahaml wrote:Banning people because they make money out of what they do is the stupidest idea I've heard for some time. Why award an olympic gold medal to a guy who happens to be the 900th best player in the world, but the 899 ahead of him are professionals? If you're going to have something in the olympics then it should be open to the best in the world.

I suspect anyone who suggests banning professionals has utterly no idea how many people make a living for their sports. You don't see Pearsons, Bolt, Phelps working 9-5 because they get paid to be athletes. After Seoul it became very clear when Carl Lewis had just become one of the highest paid US athletes while NBA basketballers were unable to compete because of their professional status.

Soccer shouldn't be in the olympics, it's not the highest level and not open to the best players. It's a B grade event for soccer and the olympics should never be allowed to be B grade.

Agreed
The IOC wanted soccer to be full strength however it is FIFA who have demanded the u23 concept because they want the World Cup to be the pinnacle of soccer which is fair enough. Not a fan of soccer or tennis in the Olympics.
Would love to see the pro's box

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:35 pm
by OnSong
Jim05 wrote:Would love to see the pro's box

Image
That'll be about $50

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:40 pm
by Jim05
OnSong wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Would love to see the pro's box

Image
That'll be about $50

Is that one of OL's Hanson Rd specials?

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:44 pm
by OnSong
He gets it cheaper than that.

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:58 pm
by overloaded
Dont be afraid to negotiate. Works for me. For $50 I can usually get an henry johnon and a hungry jacks large combo

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:27 pm
by on the rails
Jim05 wrote: The IOC wanted soccer to be full strength however it is FIFA who have demanded the u23 concept because they want the World Cup to be the pinnacle of soccer which is fair enough. Not a fan of soccer or tennis in the Olympics.
Would love to see the pro's box


David Stern NBA Commissioner is lobbying FIBA to make the Olympic Basketball Comp an U23 and under in line with the FIFA Model. He is not getting much support from the present Team USA Stars such as Kobe and Lebron. For some reason over the years the USA treat the Olympics in a greater light than the FIBA World Championship which is a far harder and longer test with 24 teams competing as opposed to 12 at Olympic level. Not sure what support he would also get from other FIBA nations - especially the challengers which at present are Spain and Argentina?

USA were quite happy for years to field all College Squads but after the Munich Gold Medal Final debacle then a strong US College Squad led by David Robinson losing to the USSR in 1988 the push was on for NBA inclusion which we saw from 1992.

A poor 2004 Olympics after a dismal World Championship for the USA on home soil in 2002 at least forced the US to take International comps more seriously when they realised the rest of the world had caught up.

As a basketball fan I am not sure which way would be best ultimately to be honest?

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:16 pm
by Bully
darts should be an olympic sport!!

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:11 pm
by on the rails
Bully wrote:darts should be an olympic sport!!


I agree!

Re: Non Olympic sports

PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:31 pm
by whufc
Bully wrote:darts should be an olympic sport!!


Would snooker also be included then.