SA Footy

Haydos is a star. Plenty of doubts have been cast over him before this World Cup. Some even suggested Watson should replace him at the top of the order. Not even in Shane Watson's wildests dreams could he do what Haydos is currently doing to the South African attack.

Well now he has the fastest hundred in World Cup history. Great performance.

He should have gone on to 150. I'm nine points from the top of my dream team ladder but I should be in front. Back to the nets Matty!

regards,

REB

And John Davison's moment of fame in the cricket world slips away...

During the CB series people doubted whether he should open the batting at the World Cup then in NZ he scores the highest score ever by an Aussie in one dayers, then goes to the World Cup and scores the fastest 100 by an Aussie and fastest 100 in a World Cup. He didn't do it against a minnow either, he saved his best for the biggest game of the World Cup so far. Hopefully he can keep this up, a flying start by Haydos and Gilly will make us tough to beat.

I gotta put my hand up as one who'd doubted whether Matty Hayden could still be the same player as a few years back.

Well having watched his knock the other night I'm happy in knowing those doubts were illfounded ... What an innings!!

HAYDEN deserves his spot and recognition for some marvellous
record breaking feats.
This is by no means detrimental but that fastest 100 ever was on
a primary school ground on a flat track.
He is the BEST flat track bully Ive seen playing cricket.

ROD Mr WATSON would need to play out of his skin to be as good as HAYDEN.
WATSON cant bludgeon an attack of that quality as does Matty.
But Matty cant bowl [as dosent HODGE] and thats why WATSON gets a game.
On seaming pitches WATSON could be as good as HAYDEN as an opener and
his bowling would be more venemous[As it was in India on seaming decks]


BREAKING NEWS
----------------------

Brilliant NZ opener Lou VINCENT has broken his wrist at practice
and will be out of the World Cup.
That is a devastating blow to the NZ chances.

I'll argue that Watson can't bowl either mal

I'll put my hand up as well for saying that Hayden should have been dropped.
After that one dayer here in Adelaide a couple of months ago, I felt strongly that he had to go but he's certainly made me eat my words since with at least 3 100's, perhaps 4?

Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort

rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort

HAYDENS best innings in o/d cricket
This was a big oval and geez he hit some massive sixes
GILCHRIST needs to push singles for him

mal wrote:

rod_rooster wrote:Once again Haydos delivers. One of his better innings last night. Super effort

HAYDENS best innings in o/d cricket
This was a big oval and geez he hit some massive sixes
GILCHRIST needs to push singles for him

Will be a big run chase for the opposition if both Hayden and Gilchrist get going.

Im impressed ROD
You must be drinking lots of Green Tea, you are spot on
You predicted HAYDO as being a star and your judgement has been vindicated 2 innings in a row.
Just think if GILLY retires imagine a HAYDEN/WATSON opening combination
They batted once together and made 150 odd partnership.
HAYDEN made that record o/d score that day[WATSON nursed him through early ]

Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7

Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7

Good to have another person who knows his cricket posting, good post.

Believe it or not I am a WATSON fan, but he can wait until the others retire
He will still be aged in his mid twenties by then

mal wrote:

Grahaml wrote:Actually, I think Watson should have been opening with Hayden. In one dayers in the first 20 overs with fielding restrictions bonus wides and boundaries from bowlers straying down leg are gold, and what better way to get as many as possible than a left hand/right and opening combo. Then Gilchrist could come in down the order after Symonds and Hussey to smash a few sixes in the last 10 overs. I feel this would give us our best balance up the top, Watson still scores pretty quickly himself, but more by pushing singles and hitting the bad ones instead of just smashing everything, so I don't see us losing much there, and it saves Gilly for number 7

Good to have another person who knows his cricket posting, good post.

Believe it or not I am a WATSON fan, but he can wait until the others retire
He will still be aged in his mid twenties by then

He'll be well and truly finished by then mal

Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?

Matt Hayden would be close to player of the tournament at the minute. Only two who would come close would be Jayasuria and Malinga from Sri Lanka...

mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?

Mal you go on about Watson making that 201 in a Shield final. Maher made 223. 2 other guys (Love and Perren) made 150 plus. Yes it was a good effort but making a double ton does not mean you are deserving of a place in the Australian side. FFS Old made 6/900 hardly any demonds in the batting surface and hardly a lot of pressure on the batsmen knowing what a commanding position they were in.

Anyway answer to your question mal, he wasn't out he retired hurt. Surprise surprise. Would be a great shame if Australia lost the World Cup Final being only 9 wickets down with Watto unable to make it to the crease.

rod_rooster wrote:

mal wrote:Hey ROD have you seen his mode of dismissal for 201 in that pura cup final ?

Mal you go on about Watson making that 201 in a Shield final. Maher made 223. 2 other guys (Love and Perren) made 150 plus. Yes it was a good effort but making a double ton does not mean you are deserving of a place in the Australian side. FFS Old made 6/900 hardly any demonds in the batting surface and hardly a lot of pressure on the batsmen knowing what a commanding position they were in.

Anyway answer to your question mal, he wasn't out he retired hurt. Surprise surprise. Would be a great shame if Australia lost the World Cup Final being only 9 wickets down with Watto unable to make it to the crease.

201 "RETIRED HURT" is my inference