Page 1 of 2

NZ V EG o/d game at the WACA

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:03 pm
by mal
NZ should beat the Eg c grade team today.
No Stresscothik how depressing
No Plonkerson we cant 'rib' him
No Vaughan team is hamstrung without him
No Harmison who retired, piss weak.
No Anderson pity is starring of late
No Lewis[not Duckworth/Lewis] obviously gone for a haircut

TAB ODDS

NZ $1-40 a gift
EG $2-80

NZ should be $1-15

NZ have superior depth in the late order and middle order
IF EG is 5/100 then expect 125 to 150
IF NZ is 5/100 can rely on 175 to 225
thats my views.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:08 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

SPOT ON

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:12 pm
by mal
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

SPOT ON


What Lewis going for a haircut :?:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:52 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
kiwis won the toss and batting

ALL OVER

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:59 pm
by mal
A massive plunge on NZ sine my post :wink:

NZ $1-40 was bet into $1-33

Go the Enzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzders

Mighty Tiger I mean WIDE first ball :arrow:

NZ 0/1 off no balls :lol:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:17 pm
by mal
NZ 2/83
15 OVERS
FLEMING + FULTON both make thier usual 15 runs each
PLUNKETT 2 wickets and is injured bowling on crickets equivalent
of Telstra Doom.
Tornado TAYLOR is set for a big un.

NZ 2/107 [22]
TAYLOR is stumped ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhno no not a referral
another umpire blunder Taylor was on 30 runs

275+ a distinct possibility


NZ 2/172[32]
TAYLOR 55*[75] what a player plays like KP
VINCENT 63*[86] hes batting better than Astle
DALYRIMPLE 0/33[4] useless

315 likely now

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:27 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
2/183 from 33 overs. NZ should declare now.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 5:31 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
Panesar takes a catch!!!! Now it's official, Monty is a better bowler AND a better fielder than Giles :)

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:08 pm
by mal
Adelaide Hawk wrote:2/183 from 33 overs. NZ should declare now.


:lol:
:lol:
:lol:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:44 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
Awesome Oram smashing sixes, can this guy play or what? Just took 21 runs from 5 balls of the Trembler.

9/302 off 49 overs.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:48 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
Here's why I don't like one day cricket. Oram backs away to play a shot, Flintoff bowls just outside off, and it's called a wide. Ridiculous. Then Flintoff is forced to bowl a straighter delivery and Oram smashes him for 6. Then Flintoff bowls an identical ball to the wide and it's not called!!! Stupid one day cricket.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:49 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
NZ 7/318 from 50 overs. Oram 54 from 33 balls.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:06 pm
by mal
NZ 7/318
Jacob ORgasAM 54*[33]
Tornado TAYLOR 71[81]
St VINCENT 76[111]

This magnificent team has now made the 3rd best score in Perth.
343 AU
335 NZ
318 NZ

A lot of credit to opener VINCENT who has now batting the way ASTLE did for many years.
ASTLE deserves credit for retiring for the team UNLIKE a certain S.AUST. batsman.
VINCENT now has now an average of 132 [66* and 76]
OOOOOOOPS my apologies apparently he was out LBW off the glove v Australia 66* = 66 out.

Ross TAYLOR another absolute superstar his leg side slogs reming me of ROY +KP

And the destructive allrounder Jacob ORgasAM
Scores of 66...104*...54* what a series
Today he was 7 off 14 balls = 47 off his last 19 balls.

Well as with NZ chasing the AU 343 on sunday, a big chase will give the EG top order
an opportunity to PLAY SHOTS and change thier defensive mindsets.

Nah NZ easy for me and that $1-40 gift from the TAB pays some bills for me.

I noticed AH complaining about the wide call on FLINTOFF.
My advice if you dont like o/d cricket switch on to FAMILY FEUD or
Channell 10 has NEIGHBOURS and the SIMPSONS instead

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:49 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
mal wrote:I noticed AH complaining about the wide call on FLINTOFF.
My advice if you dont like o/d cricket switch on to FAMILY FEUD or
Channell 10 has NEIGHBOURS and the SIMPSONS instead


So I have to listen to your incestant ranting and raving over Elliott and the Redbacks selectors, but I am not afforded the luxury of an observation on the one-day farce? Sorry, I didn't realise this was YOUR forum.

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:53 pm
by mal
NZ 2/111
JOYCE 53*
0FF 22 0VERS
NICE START
LOYE out caught in the slip again

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:07 pm
by mal
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:I noticed AH complaining about the wide call on FLINTOFF.
My advice if you dont like o/d cricket switch on to FAMILY FEUD or
Channell 10 has NEIGHBOURS and the SIMPSONS instead


So I have to listen to your incestant ranting and raving over Elliott and the Redbacks selectors, but I am not afforded the luxury of an observation on the one-day farce? Sorry, I didn't realise this was YOUR forum.


I praise more cricketers than any other person who posts on this site, prob about 40 players
I criticise Manou-Elliott-Astle-Martyn....Brett LEE about 50/50
You use selective misrepresentations for your criticism of me.
Now take a valuim and enjoy the o/d game, which you incestantly sledge on about :roll:

PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 11:00 pm
by mal
7/260
JOYCE 66 [82] big improver
NIXON 49[46] bats better than the other 2 battlers who have kept for EG this tour
PLUNKETT 25*[25] best number 9 EG have had this tour
NIXON + PLUNKETT put on 76 for the 9th wicket.
VETTORI 2/40[10] outstanding as per usual

Man of the match was St.VINCENT 76[111]
Could have gone to 3 others
TAYLOR 71[81]
ORAM 54*[33]
VETTORI 11*[7] AND 2/40 when nearly every bowler got clobbered
A sitter dropped of his final ball would have =3/40

My MOTM would have been ORAM

EG batting improved but the c graders wont win another game on tour

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 8:55 am
by MAY-Z
mal. he didnt have a sitter dropped off his last ball he had a caught behind given not out by steve davis despite the fact nixon suggested hussey should walk at the gabba he didnt take his own advice last night

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:12 am
by mal
MAY-Z wrote:mal. he didnt have a sitter dropped off his last ball he had a caught behind given not out by steve davis despite the fact nixon suggested hussey should walk at the gabba he didnt take his own advice last night


There were that many dropped catches .......
Yes NIXON was definitely out and Danny would have finished on 3/40

PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 9:38 am
by Punk Rooster
MAY-Z wrote:mal. he didnt have a sitter dropped off his last ball he had a caught behind given not out by steve davis despite the fact nixon suggested hussey should walk at the gabba he didnt take his own advice last night
1 of many reasons why Nixon is an A-grade tosser. I was pleased that he didn't make 50 last night, as he is not deserving of that "honour"- especially with continued playing of the reverse sweep, very unsuccessfully.