Page 1 of 14

AUST V ENG 2nd test Adelaide.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:13 am
by mal
England won the toss.
Must now be half a chance as this is a bat first + win the game venue.
I will give exclusive SAFOOTY reports on the game.
I did not go to the game as I felt obliged to report on the game :!:

Mcgrath is playing, phew!

EG 0/2

Personally I feel Australia will suffer not pickng a 5th bowler.
Symonds should have played, Martyn fortunate to be selected.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:19 am
by mighty_tiger_79
MAL

all of us logged on here at SA FOOTY are truly grateful that you are giving us your time and your professional analytical reports on the game, instead of being at the ground getting totally wasted....

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:05 pm
by mal
Drinks after 1st hour
EG 0/32
A typical Les Burdett featherbed.
Pitch will be a batting paradise for 3 days and by days 4/5 will disintigrate.
England has been gifted with a **LUCKY** coin toss + a chance to win.
Lee + Mcgratch looked inocous.
Clark + Warne will be our best wicket taking options.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:08 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
Strauss gone 1/32

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:35 pm
by mal
Clarkyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
My man is STAMPYing his authority
EG 2/45
Strauss c martyn b clark 14
Cook c gilchrist b clark 27

Clark 5 overs 2/5 outperforms Lee AGAIN

WARNING BELLS Warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrney has Belly rooted.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:37 pm
by blink
Stuart Clark continues his dream entrance into the Test fray.

England 2/47

Bell 4*
Collingwood 2*

Clark 2/7 (5.0 overs)


I felt obliged to help you out Mal!!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:43 pm
by blink
Although didn't expect you to post right before me!!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:10 pm
by mal
2/58 LUNCH

The affable new pace bowling sensation Stewie Clark has single handedly
brought Australia into the contest.
4 bowlers tiring later in the day might be a snag especially with PIETERSON
to come in, one suspects the duel between KP + the bowlers will decide the
fate of this match.
If we can have EG about 8/280 at stumps we will do very very well.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:25 pm
by Adelaide Hawk
mal wrote:Clark 5 overs 2/5 outperforms Lee AGAIN


Why just Lee? He has also "outperformed" McGrath and Warne.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 1:40 pm
by mal
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:Clark 5 overs 2/5 outperforms Lee AGAIN


Why just Lee? He has also "outperformed" McGrath and Warne.


Yeah but Mcgrath + Warne occasionally outperform Clark :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:13 pm
by rod_rooster
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
mal wrote:Clark 5 overs 2/5 outperforms Lee AGAIN


Why just Lee? He has also "outperformed" McGrath and Warne.


Warne has bowled extremely well though.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:52 pm
by mal
GREAT cricket captains like MAL + REB wil always after a break
bowl thier best bowlers.
Ponting missed the boat.
After lunch he opened with Mcgrath + Warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrney.
History supports that decision, despite being wrong.
As I watched frustratingly from the lounge chair I wished I was at the ground
to yell out to Ponting his error.
Stewie Clark the one man star performer sat in the outfield.
After the cursing and grunting he finally makes a change and its its its Brett Lee.
Lee 1st over cost 10 runs, whilst Clark would have been scratching his balls waiting....

EG 2/100 of 43 overs, the bird has flown, poor poor captaining by Ponting.
For the 2nd time today Clark has come on for a spell after Lee + Mcgrath got the
batsman's eyes in. :twisted:

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:58 pm
by another grub
pOOR CAPTINCY....PONTING HAS TO GO!!!! SHOULD HAVE GOT RID OF HIM AFTER THE LAST ASHES!!!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:35 pm
by rod_rooster
another grub wrote:pOOR CAPTINCY....PONTING HAS TO GO!!!! SHOULD HAVE GOT RID OF HIM AFTER THE LAST ASHES!!!


Who would you have as captain? I'm not having a go it is a serious question. I don't disagree. Ponting's captaincy leaves a lot to be desired but i can't come up with a logical replacement. Obviously Warne but that will never happen. Who else is there? Hussey perhaps?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:49 pm
by mal
TEA 2/140
BELL 50 *
COLLINGWOOD 50*
LEE 13 OVERS 0/45
CLARK 13 OVERS 2/23

A fighting 99 partnership between nobodys Collingwood/Bell has turned the
game back in Englands favour.
Collingwood unlike the AFL footy club does not crack under pressure.
Much MALigned Ian Bell continues to frustrate the Australian bowlers.
Warne has bowled very well but o wickets.
Clark is still bowling exceedingly well.

The game is stil up for grabs, I implore Ponting to use some nouse and
bowl Clark with either Warne or Mcgrath on resumption.
The lack of a quality 5th bowling option is as predicted beginning to hurt Australia

My prediction at stumps
EG 5/271

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 3:54 pm
by mighty_tiger_79
these 2 lads will bad out the rest of the day both making 100's

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:02 pm
by RustyCage
mal wrote:GREAT cricket captains like MAL + REB wil always after a break
bowl thier best bowlers.
Ponting missed the boat.
After lunch he opened with Mcgrath + Warrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrney.
History supports that decision, despite being wrong.
As I watched frustratingly from the lounge chair I wished I was at the ground
to yell out to Ponting his error.
Stewie Clark the one man star performer sat in the outfield.
After the cursing and grunting he finally makes a change and its its its Brett Lee.
Lee 1st over cost 10 runs, whilst Clark would have been scratching his balls waiting....

EG 2/100 of 43 overs, the bird has flown, poor poor captaining by Ponting.
For the 2nd time today Clark has come on for a spell after Lee + Mcgrath got the
batsman's eyes in. :twisted:


Boof opened with Cullen and Bailey in the tour match, and Bell and Collingwood batted out the session after lunch then too.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:04 pm
by MightyEagles
Why do I bother starting a thread if someone starts another one after I started one.
People can post in the other one.

http://safootycentral.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=5059

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:05 pm
by RustyCage
MightyEagles wrote:Why do I bother starting a thread if someone starts another one after I started one.
People can post in the other one.


Is that why you started it ten days ago? So you could call it your thread?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:09 pm
by MightyEagles
That does not render a reply.