Mankad?

First Class Cricket Talk (International and State)

Is the Mankad an acceptable practice in the game of Cricket?

1. No - It's against the Spirit of the game
1
4%
2. No - Remove the rule that permits it
0
No votes
3. Yes - Warning should be given to the Batsman first
11
44%
4. Yes - Batsmen get enough favours, stuff em'
13
52%
 
Total votes : 25

Re: Mankad?

Postby Booney » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:51 am

Dogwatcher wrote:
Tony Clifton wrote:
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Booney wrote:Anyone else of the understanding that you had to complete your action before being able to mankad someone? ie - roll the arm over and then you could have them.

The rule has changed, you have to be anywhere in your delivery stride.

Not quite - the batsman can leave his crease legally as soon as the bowler enters his delivery stride. My understanding is that the 'delivery stride' commences at back foot landing.

In this case his back foot had landed prior to him taking off the bails so it shouldn't have been given out IMO.


He never went into his delivery stride, he just ran past and took the bails off, didn't he?


Yep, I'm not right up to date with current interpretations, but for mine, he didn't even start his action, let alone complete it.
PAFC. Forever.

LOOK OUT, WE'RE COMING!
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 58373
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 7494 times
Been liked: 10781 times

Re: Mankad?

Postby Lightning McQueen » Thu Feb 04, 2016 10:52 am

I've tried googling the rules, they are very sketchy.

The general consensus would be to not leave the crease until you see the ball pass by your left eye while a right arm over the wicket bowler is bowling.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51355
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4347 times
Been liked: 7926 times

Re: Mankad?

Postby Tony Clifton » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:11 am

Turns out I'm wrong

This is what I thought the rules were:

Law 42.15 permits the bowler to attempt to run out the non-striker, but only before entering his delivery stride which starts when the bowler's back foot lands for that stride and ends when the front foot lands in the same stride.


However the rules have been changed to this which means that the batter was correctly given out:

The International Cricket Council, however, has altered Law 42.15 for matches under its jurisdiction to read:

"The bowler is permitted, before releasing the ball and provided he has not completed his usual delivery swing, to attempt to run out the non-striker."

Under this regulation a bowler should be deemed to have completed his delivery swing once his arm passes the normal point of ball release which should be interpreted as the moment when the delivery arm is at its highest point.
This is Tony Clifton! A name to respect! A name to fear!
User avatar
Tony Clifton
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2674
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2010 10:00 pm
Has liked: 1462 times
Been liked: 244 times
Grassroots Team: Adelaide University

Re: Mankad?

Postby bennymacca » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:18 am

So when does a ball become "live" again?

When the bowler starts his runup? When he enters his delivery stride?
User avatar
bennymacca
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15028
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 12:22 pm
Has liked: 2253 times
Been liked: 1803 times
Grassroots Team: Freeling

Re: Mankad?

Postby Lightning McQueen » Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:19 am

When he presses L1.
HOGG SHIELD DIVISION V WINNER 2018.
User avatar
Lightning McQueen
Coach
 
Posts: 51355
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:43 am
Location: Radiator Springs
Has liked: 4347 times
Been liked: 7926 times

Re: Mankad?

Postby daysofourlives » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:29 pm

Tony Clifton wrote:Turns out I'm wrong

This is what I thought the rules were:

Law 42.15 permits the bowler to attempt to run out the non-striker, but only before entering his delivery stride which starts when the bowler's back foot lands for that stride and ends when the front foot lands in the same stride.


However the rules have been changed to this which means that the batter was correctly given out:

The International Cricket Council, however, has altered Law 42.15 for matches under its jurisdiction to read:

"The bowler is permitted, before releasing the ball and provided he has not completed his usual delivery swing, to attempt to run out the non-striker."

Under this regulation a bowler should be deemed to have completed his delivery swing once his arm passes the normal point of ball release which should be interpreted as the moment when the delivery arm is at its highest point.


So which rule do we amateurs go by?
Supercoach Spring Racing Champion 2019
Spargo's Good Friday Cup Champion 2020
daysofourlives
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11510
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 2:35 pm
Has liked: 2423 times
Been liked: 1660 times
Grassroots Team: Angaston

Re: Mankad?

Postby Jim05 » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:42 pm

The umpire was perfectly correct in this situation as the rules are quite clear.
However as Daisy stated above it would be interesting to see whether amateur cricket uses those rules or still the old ones
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 47130
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1126 times
Been liked: 3553 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Mankad?

Postby heater31 » Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:43 pm

daysofourlives wrote:
So which rule do we amateurs go by?


This one......

The International Cricket Council, however, has altered Law 42.15 for matches under its jurisdiction to read:

"The bowler is permitted, before releasing the ball and provided he has not completed his usual delivery swing, to attempt to run out the non-striker."

Under this regulation a bowler should be deemed to have completed his delivery swing once his arm passes the normal point of ball release which should be interpreted as the moment when the delivery arm is at its highest point.
User avatar
heater31
Moderator
 
 
Posts: 16538
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:42 am
Location: the back blocks
Has liked: 525 times
Been liked: 1263 times

Re: Mankad?

Postby Grahaml » Fri Feb 05, 2016 11:29 pm

The rule change was pretty well publicised when it changed, so anyone involved who keeps an interest in these things should know. Most local cricket sides have a few blokes like that around.

bennymacca wrote:So when does a ball become "live" again?

When the bowler starts his runup? When he enters his delivery stride?


Technically, the ball is live when a bowler begins his runup. This is actually why umpires signal dead ball when a bowler aborts in his runup. A bowler can attempt to run out a non striker from that point until (as noted already) his arm goes over the top.
Grahaml
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4812
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 11:59 am
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 169 times

Re: Mankad?

Postby JK » Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:18 am

So Hypothetically if a bowler takes a few steps of his run up and were to spot a non-striker out of his crease could he bowl at the non-strikers stumps in a mankad/run-out attempt? (Fanciful situation, just mucking around with the rules and what ifs)
FUSC
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37380
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4461 times
Been liked: 2988 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Re: Mankad?

Postby whufc » Sat Feb 06, 2016 12:11 pm

JK wrote:So Hypothetically if a bowler takes a few steps of his run up and were to spot a non-striker out of his crease could he bowl at the non-strikers stumps in a mankad/run-out attempt? (Fanciful situation, just mucking around with the rules and what ifs)


Yeah I think that's correct essentially that could happen
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 27532
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5591 times
Been liked: 2531 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Previous

Board index   Other Sports  Cricket

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |