Afridis fastest ODI hundred record beaten by Corey Anderson on an oval no bigger than my backyard.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:08 pm
by LBT
Lol 3/275 off 20 overs, on track for 600
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:09 pm
by LBT
Oh it's a 21 over match!
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:59 pm
by Jim05
What a disgraceful venue for an international. These scores should be wiped from the records.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:02 pm
by daysofourlives
Jim05 wrote:What a disgraceful venue for an international. These scores should be wiped from the records.
Its not that small JIm, Adelaide oval smaller last night 56m one side 62m the other
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:05 pm
by Jim05
daysofourlives wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a disgraceful venue for an international. These scores should be wiped from the records.
Its not that small JIm, Adelaide oval smaller last night 56m one side 62m the other
Must be the camera angles then, it looks tiny. Didnt see the AO last night so cant comment on its size
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 4:49 pm
by Failed Creation
Regardless of ground size, hitting a ton off 36 balls in 36 minutes is one hell of an achievement.
For what it's worth, I think Queenstown Events Centre looks beautiful, with all the mountains in background.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:04 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
Jim05 wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a disgraceful venue for an international. These scores should be wiped from the records.
Its not that small JIm, Adelaide oval smaller last night 56m one side 62m the other
Must be the camera angles then, it looks tiny. Didnt see the AO last night so cant comment on its size
But you can call a venue a disgrace and demand records wiped despite knowing anything about the venue.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:35 pm
by Jim05
The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Jim05 wrote:
daysofourlives wrote:
Jim05 wrote:What a disgraceful venue for an international. These scores should be wiped from the records.
Its not that small JIm, Adelaide oval smaller last night 56m one side 62m the other
Must be the camera angles then, it looks tiny. Didnt see the AO last night so cant comment on its size
But you can call a venue a disgrace and demand records wiped despite knowing anything about the venue.
Only going on what I saw and its looks like the smallest venue ive ever seen
Re: FARCE
Posted: Wed Jan 01, 2014 9:41 pm
by Squids
Looked small and the boundary was even brought in a little bit.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:26 am
by jackpot jim
Farce my arse. The Ground looked as tho it was a fair size to me. Think the NZ batsmen made it look small by their enormous hits. The Windies bowling was cannon fodder. Would've thought whoever their coach is would be looking for another job tomorrow. Totally unacceptable performance. All the same, it was an incredible batting performance and for same one to say the size of the ground was the key factor in the MASSIVE score is the real farce.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 12:19 pm
by Squids
Don't know what game you were watching jackpot jim, if you were indeed watching the correct game you better go and see these guys www.specsavers.com.au
The boundaries were a disgrace.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:25 pm
by daysofourlives
Squids wrote:Don't know what game you were watching jackpot jim, if you were indeed watching the correct game you better go and see these guys http://www.specsavers.com.au
The boundaries were a disgrace.
I'l say it again, it was bigger than Adelaide Oval, don't know what game you were watching squiddly
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:50 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
daysofourlives wrote:
Squids wrote:Don't know what game you were watching jackpot jim, if you were indeed watching the correct game you better go and see these guys http://www.specsavers.com.au
The boundaries were a disgrace.
I'l say it again, it was bigger than Adelaide Oval, don't know what game you were watching squiddly
Maybe all cricket records at Adelaide oval prior to the redevelopment should be wiped, seeing as though they were almost the smallest square boundaries in first class cricket.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:55 pm
by Spargo
Can we keep the facts out of this discussion please - for interests sake.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:03 pm
by Squids
One match was for a 20/20 teeball match the other was an international.
There was no way it was bigger than Adelaide Oval when it has legitimate boundaries.
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:19 pm
by Squids
Facts
AO 62m square 84m straight
QO 65m square 75m straight
WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT, SQUIDS CORRECT AGAIN
THAT'S A FACT!
Re: FARCE
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2014 2:24 pm
by The Sleeping Giant
How Squids? You just posted that Adelaide Oval is shorter on the square.
Oh, and until you put a link with your sauce, it means nothing.
Anyway, here is the innings for those who want a look. Anderson certainly makes the ground look small with how well he hit them.