by Squids » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:07 pm
by heater31 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:10 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:14 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:17 pm
by Johno6 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:21 pm
by RustyCage » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:24 pm
Squids wrote:Team
Michael Clarke (c)
Ed Cowan
Moises Henriques
Phillip Hughes
Nathan Lyon
James Pattinson
Peter Siddle
Mitchell Starc
Matthew Wade
David Warner
Shane Watson
Glenn Maxwell 12th man
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:26 pm
by stan » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:00 pm
by whufc » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:21 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:23 pm
by test » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:30 pm
by whufc » Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:33 pm
test wrote:Not a real strong side but probably the best we've got. There's little point playing another spinner when Clarke and Warner are already better then the incumbent.
by Brodlach » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:01 am
whufc wrote:test wrote:Not a real strong side but probably the best we've got. There's little point playing another spinner when Clarke and Warner are already better then the incumbent.
Problem is Clarke is well know for having back issues which has limited his bowling previously! We can't afford for him to miss games because of injuries from bowling.
Maybe he sees another 6fa
If Clarke and Warner are going to bowl 20 overs between them an innings why not play an extra batter which appears to be a massive weakness. One of these fast bowlers will bowl less than 10 overs an innings and be wasted!
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by CoverKing » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:12 am
by Brodlach » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:20 am
Brodlach wrote:Rory Laird might end up the best IMO, he is an absolute jet. He has been in great form at the Bloods
by whufc » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:28 am
Brodlach wrote:whufc wrote:test wrote:Not a real strong side but probably the best we've got. There's little point playing another spinner when Clarke and Warner are already better then the incumbent.
Problem is Clarke is well know for having back issues which has limited his bowling previously! We can't afford for him to miss games because of injuries from bowling.
Maybe he sees another 6fa
If Clarke and Warner are going to bowl 20 overs between them an innings why not play an extra batter which appears to be a massive weakness. One of these fast bowlers will bowl less than 10 overs an innings and be wasted!
Good point about Warner bowling spin. I guess with Watson not bowling, a bowling all rounder (Henriques) was more important than another batsman on those pitches. If the pitches are there normal roads, we shouldnt need another specialist batsman
by RustyCage » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:34 am
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:36 am
CoverKing wrote:I'm not sure if Warner will be fit to bowl. What hand is his injured finger on?
by whufc » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:37 am
pafc1870 wrote:We have seen in the past with the likes of Colin Miller and Jason Krezja that very average spinners can become world beaters on the Indian pitches. We are definitely one spin bowler short here. I really can't see how we will take 20 wickets. We just need to hope India bat first and declare twice, leaving us with a target we can chase down
by The Sleeping Giant » Thu Feb 21, 2013 8:50 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |