Page 1 of 7
Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:01 pm
by Coach Bombay
Team at a guess
Klinger
Ludeman
Ferguson
Cooper
Head
Christian
Botha
Richardson
Bailey
Sayers
Haberfield
12th Ross 13th Mennie
NSW
Dawson
Henry
Cruickshank
Maddinson
Rohrer
Nevill
Haddin
Abbott
Zampa
Copeland
Sandhu
12th Doran 13th Sandhu
Nsw missing
Watson
Warner
Clarke
Smith
Henriques
Okeefe
Starc
Hazelwood
Bollinger
Cummins
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:54 pm
by MightyEagles
If we are any hope of hosting the final, this is a must win game.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:49 pm
by Rik E Boy
The Blues are very young at the moment and the Redbacks should get the job done comfortably here. Blueboys playing for pride in the one dayers but still a chance for the Shield (as is everyone else if you look at the ladder).
regards,
REB
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:30 pm
by CoverKing
Rohrer now in the aus a squad meaning he won't play I would have thought?
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:33 am
by Brodlach
CoverKing wrote:Rohrer now in the aus a squad meaning he won't play I would have thought?
Mentioned last night he was catching an early flight to captain NSW today
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:38 am
by whufc
Is there going to be a live stream today!
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:39 am
by Brodlach
whufc wrote:Is there going to be a live stream today!
It will be on Fox I think
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:54 am
by bloods08
Surely Ross will play beforw Bailey. It was proven last week that 6 bowlers is too many especially with Bailey hardly bowling even though Putland going off injured. You only really need a max of 5 bowlers these days as you can bowl up to 13 overs each.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 8:56 am
by Lightning McQueen
bloods08 wrote:Surely Ross will play beforw Bailey. It was proven last week that 6 bowlers is too many especially with Bailey hardly bowling even though Putland going off injured. You only really need a max of 5 bowlers these days as you can bowl up to 13 overs each.
Bailey should have bowled more overs, 4 overs for 15.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:01 am
by bloods08
Lightning McQueen wrote:bloods08 wrote:Surely Ross will play beforw Bailey. It was proven last week that 6 bowlers is too many especially with Bailey hardly bowling even though Putland going off injured. You only really need a max of 5 bowlers these days as you can bowl up to 13 overs each.
Bailey should have bowled more overs, 4 overs for 15.
He bowled well but was never going to take a wicket.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:13 am
by Lightning McQueen
bloods08 wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:bloods08 wrote:Surely Ross will play beforw Bailey. It was proven last week that 6 bowlers is too many especially with Bailey hardly bowling even though Putland going off injured. You only really need a max of 5 bowlers these days as you can bowl up to 13 overs each.
Bailey should have bowled more overs, 4 overs for 15.
He bowled well but was never going to take a wicket.
Better than the poo the skipper served up..............twice.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:17 am
by Lightning McQueen
Klinger
Ludeman
Ferguson
Cooper
Head
Christian
Botha
Richardson
Mennie
Sayers
Haberfield
For mine
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:25 am
by Brodlach
Lightning McQueen wrote:Klinger
Ludeman
Ferguson
Cooper
Head
Christian
Botha
Richardson
Mennie
Sayers
Haberfield
For mine
Swap Mennie for Ross and that would be mine. Extra batsman
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:29 am
by Lightning McQueen
Brodlach wrote:Lightning McQueen wrote:Klinger
Ludeman
Ferguson
Cooper
Head
Christian
Botha
Richardson
Mennie
Sayers
Haberfield
For mine
Swap Mennie for Ross and that would be mine. Extra batsman
That would give us 5 bowlers, we need that extra one for injury or variation, we have a short tail and should back the top order to get the job done. Ross's fielding was woeful on Saturday and cost us the game.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:32 am
by Brodlach
I would bowl Ferg and Cooper a bit more. Ross can bowl a little too.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:34 am
by Lightning McQueen
Fair enough, Ross may aswell of stood out there with a bowl on his head so the seagulls could have a drink.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 9:36 am
by Brodlach
Lightning McQueen wrote:Fair enough, Ross may aswell of stood out there with a bowl on his head so the seagulls could have a drink.

Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:42 pm
by Coach Bombay
BAD NEWS at selection again....going a batter short. Ross retains his spot. Head comes in for cooper rather than a bowler.

Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:47 pm
by Lightning McQueen
bays09 wrote:BAD NEWS at selection again....going a batter short. Ross retains his spot. Head comes in for cooper rather than a bowler.

I thought we needed 6 bowlers anyway, I would've has Ross & Bailey out of the XI.
Re: Redbacks v Blues

Posted:
Thu Feb 14, 2013 1:48 pm
by Coach Bombay
Lightning McQueen wrote:bays09 wrote:BAD NEWS at selection again....going a batter short. Ross retains his spot. Head comes in for cooper rather than a bowler.

I thought we needed 6 bowlers anyway, I would've has Ross & Bailey out of the XI.
need 6 batsmen