by Rik E Boy » Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:47 pm
by dedja » Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:51 pm
by the joker » Sun Dec 04, 2011 10:53 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:19 am
by cripple » Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:31 am
Rik E Boy wrote:Nah boys don't feel like keeping anymore. I'll just open the batting. Surely NZ can't afford this kind of attitude. Surely it should be 'keep wickets or hand in your black cap'. They are one ordinary Cricket team and simply don't have the luxury of having McCullum opening the batting when Young is spudding it up with the bat.
Selfish much?
regards,
REB
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Dec 05, 2011 8:53 am
by Media Park » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:54 am
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by westcoastpanther » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:58 am
by mal » Mon Dec 05, 2011 12:49 pm
by MAY-Z » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:13 pm
by mal » Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:18 pm
MAY-Z wrote:the reason mccullum stopped keeping was because he had back injuries and wouldnt have been able to play much more international cricket if it involved keeping for long periods in test match cricket. so he is actually helping new zealand cricket by giving up the gloves as his batting would definitely be better than the next new zealand batsman available
by Dogmatic » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:07 pm
by Rik E Boy » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:55 pm
cripple wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Nah boys don't feel like keeping anymore. I'll just open the batting. Surely NZ can't afford this kind of attitude. Surely it should be 'keep wickets or hand in your black cap'. They are one ordinary Cricket team and simply don't have the luxury of having McCullum opening the batting when Young is spudding it up with the bat.
Selfish much?
regards,
REB
Surely you're joking. You might have a point if he was a rubbish batsman but he is clearly in their top 2-3 in that regard so there is no problem with it. Sangakarra has done it with Sri Lanka and it is a feasible way to prolong a players career. Also thier to support the underskilled keeper and help him progress.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Dec 05, 2011 9:57 pm
MAY-Z wrote:the reason mccullum stopped keeping was because he had back injuries and wouldnt have been able to play much more international cricket if it involved keeping for long periods in test match cricket. so he is actually helping new zealand cricket by giving up the gloves as his batting would definitely be better than the next new zealand batsman available
by Media Park » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:05 pm
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by Jim05 » Mon Dec 05, 2011 10:11 pm
by story of my life » Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:37 pm
Jim05 wrote:From what ive seen of Williamson he is rubbish.
by cripple » Wed Dec 07, 2011 7:13 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:cripple wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Nah boys don't feel like keeping anymore. I'll just open the batting. Surely NZ can't afford this kind of attitude. Surely it should be 'keep wickets or hand in your black cap'. They are one ordinary Cricket team and simply don't have the luxury of having McCullum opening the batting when Young is spudding it up with the bat.
Selfish much?
regards,
REB
Surely you're joking. You might have a point if he was a rubbish batsman but he is clearly in their top 2-3 in that regard so there is no problem with it. Sangakarra has done it with Sri Lanka and it is a feasible way to prolong a players career. Also thier to support the underskilled keeper and help him progress.
Why would it make a difference if he couldn't bat? Fair dinkum.
regards,
REB
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |