Page 1 of 1

Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:42 am
by Jim05
Saw on Fox Sports that Nathan Hauritz was bashed at a a QLD nightclub and has undergone facial surgery.
Has been sanctioned by CA and no charges were laid which to me indicates that Hauritz instigated the attack.
Not a fan of the Ritz but that is still not good news

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:45 am
by brod
Jim05 wrote:Saw on Fox Sports that Nathan Hauritz was bashed at a a QLD nightclub and has undergone facial surgery.
Not a fan of the Ritz but that is shocking news, hope he recovers


Just put this on the State cricket thread (thats were he belongs)

Great minds Jim ;)

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:20 am
by Media Park
Second best spinner in Australia...

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:31 am
by Jim05
Media Park wrote:Second best spinner in Australia...

=))
Be lucky to get a game for NSW this year

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:26 pm
by Bulls forever
Jim05 wrote:
Media Park wrote:Second best spinner in Australia...

=))
Be lucky to get a game for NSW this year


Gee Jimbo, read the title, thought the Poms were out here again and Horrie was back bowling to them. Never good news, recover quickly Horrie, a very honest trier.

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 6:53 pm
by Grahaml
Jim05 wrote:Saw on Fox Sports that Nathan Hauritz was bashed at a a QLD nightclub and has undergone facial surgery.
Has been sanctioned by CA and no charges were laid which to me indicates that Hauritz instigated the attack.
Not a fan of the Ritz but that is still not good news


You can't read that into it. It may well be the case, but being out late drinking especially with a cricket season nearing is worthy of a sanction on it's own.

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:23 pm
by jackpot jim
Unless you're a loser, why would ya go near any nightclubs which are run by criminals and druggies. If i was any person of note, the last place i'd be visiting are places where 90% of the people around you are fuelled by alcohol & drugs.

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 9:26 pm
by Jim05
Grahaml wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Saw on Fox Sports that Nathan Hauritz was bashed at a a QLD nightclub and has undergone facial surgery.
Has been sanctioned by CA and no charges were laid which to me indicates that Hauritz instigated the attack.
Not a fan of the Ritz but that is still not good news


You can't read that into it. It may well be the case, but being out late drinking especially with a cricket season nearing is worthy of a sanction on it's own.

Sorry Graham but if some guy caved in my face without provacation id be pressing charges which makes me think the guy was not the instigator. Could be wrong but it smells a bit fishy

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:01 pm
by CENTURION
jackpot jim wrote:Unless you're a loser, why would ya go near any nightclubs which are run by criminals and druggies. If i was any person of note, the last place i'd be visiting are places where 90% of the people around you are fuelled by alcohol & drugs.

so, you don't go to many Port matches then? ;)

Re: Hauritz Bashed

PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:45 am
by Grahaml
Jim05 wrote:
Grahaml wrote:
Jim05 wrote:Saw on Fox Sports that Nathan Hauritz was bashed at a a QLD nightclub and has undergone facial surgery.
Has been sanctioned by CA and no charges were laid which to me indicates that Hauritz instigated the attack.
Not a fan of the Ritz but that is still not good news


You can't read that into it. It may well be the case, but being out late drinking especially with a cricket season nearing is worthy of a sanction on it's own.

Sorry Graham but if some guy caved in my face without provacation id be pressing charges which makes me think the guy was not the instigator. Could be wrong but it smells a bit fishy


Not sure what planet you've been living on but you do need some sort of evidence. If there was no footage and no witnesses then nothing could be done. It's not impossible that he was king hit with nobody around to witness it and so nobody could identify the guy. Again, you may be correct, but you may also be incorrect.