Page 1 of 3

1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:38 pm
by NFC
Really looking forward to this series, should be an absolute belter!

Hopefully both teams look to play attacking cricket so we can get results. This series could be a classic.

Starts tonight with coverage on Fox Sports.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:49 pm
by lion heart
I think the Indians may struggle to adapt to the South African conditions. SA have shortened considerably to win the series in the last few days. 8)

SA groundsman are masters @ doctoring up pitches to suit the team. Only problem is you always seem to lose quite a few hours play due to bad light / weather which can cost/save a match.

Looking forward to the series.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 7:04 pm
by NFC
Looks like there will be no or little play on Day 1 due to rain. Just great. :roll:

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:28 pm
by mal
A : Lets hope we have a bowler friendly series
B : If we get bowling decks, lets see how the Indian flat track superstars cope
C : I hope SA win the series

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:39 pm
by Jim05
Come on the indians!
Dont want to see saffers win anything.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:46 pm
by NFC
Sehwag gone for naught, caught by Amla at 3rd man off the bowling of Steyn. Good captaincy by Smith to have the catching 3rd man.

Steyn is an absolute gun, the guy is easily the most enjoyable bowling to watch in the world.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Thu Dec 16, 2010 11:57 pm
by NFC
And Morkel has Ghambir out caught behind, off the glove from a steepler, and given not out by umpire Davis.

No referral system is a joke, as was that decision.

:roll:

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:49 am
by jackpot jim
reports were that there was 100 mm of rain (4 inches) overnight and morning. Sun shining now and 47 overs have been scheduled for day 1.

India 3/31 er 3/35

Tendulker 5* make that 9*
Laxman 0*

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:51 am
by CoverKing
morkel with the wickets of gambhir and dravid

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:49 am
by NFC
Steyn gets Laxman with an absolute belter, and Kallis dismisses Raina for 1.

India 5/67. :D

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 1:52 am
by Gozu
Don't look too flash when they're not playing on their roads & padding their runs stats back in India.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 2:00 am
by NFC
Steyn in the midst of an unbelievable spell.

And yep, Indians not looking too flash without their roads.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:17 am
by Rik E Boy
NFC wrote:And Morkel has Ghambir out caught behind, off the glove from a steepler, and given not out by umpire Davis.

No referral system is a joke, as was that decision.

:roll:


Disagree. Tough decision for the ump and you can't blame him for not giving it out IMO. If there was a touch on the glove it wasn't all that obvious and with the extreme bounce of the delivery that makes it a very tough decision for mine.

As for no referral system I agree and guess whose idea it was not to use it? That's right the Indians.

regards,

REB

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:20 am
by locky801
India 9/136

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:43 am
by mal
mal wrote:A : Lets hope we have a bowler friendly series
B : If we get bowling decks, lets see how the Indian flat track superstars cope
C : I hope SA win the series


Heres my assement of the Indian top orders efforts

GIRLHIR 5 [43] had no idea on a bouncy deck, could have been out 10 times, was out once b4 officially out, weak effort
SHEWAG 0[3] caught at 3rd playing his usual shot wide off off stump, didnt last long enough to assess
DREARYVID 14[42] circumspect, played well, but LBW to a ball keepeing low, unlucky
TENDULKAR 36[34] Prob the best 36 he has ever made, class performer
LAXATIVEMAN 7[20] was hanging back on the back foot, LBW to a ball he played back to, and he played across the line, can get away with that in India, but not in this part of the world, a flop effort
RAINA 1 [3] he cant even play short pitched bowling in India, so no surprise to see this iffy batsman fail in SA

The disMissALs of Dravid and Laxman sums up what Ive always thought
Both LBW to rare full deliveries in this innings
Both appearingly hanging back on the back foot becoz of the bounce and both LBW to balls they would prob have been more forward to on thier own Indian decks

9/136
The Australian fast bowlers watching this would have been irked
Weve been trying to get these flat deck superstars on a bouncy pitch for years

Hopefully we get these decks for the rest of the series, and to see if the over inflated Indian batting averages drop

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:13 am
by mighty_tiger_79
not a bad effort by Boucher to effect the run out

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 12:02 pm
by NFC
mal wrote:
mal wrote:A : Lets hope we have a bowler friendly series
B : If we get bowling decks, lets see how the Indian flat track superstars cope
C : I hope SA win the series


Heres my assement of the Indian top orders efforts

GIRLHIR 5 [43] had no idea on a bouncy deck, could have been out 10 times, was out once b4 officially out, weak effort
SHEWAG 0[3] caught at 3rd playing his usual shot wide off off stump, didnt last long enough to assess
DREARYVID 14[42] circumspect, played well, but LBW to a ball keepeing low, unlucky
TENDULKAR 36[34] Prob the best 36 he has ever made, class performer
LAXATIVEMAN 7[20] was hanging back on the back foot, LBW to a ball he played back to, and he played across the line, can get away with that in India, but not in this part of the world, a flop effort
RAINA 1 [3] he cant even play short pitched bowling in India, so no surprise to see this iffy batsman fail in SA

The disMissALs of Dravid and Laxman sums up what Ive always thought
Both LBW to rare full deliveries in this innings
Both appearingly hanging back on the back foot becoz of the bounce and both LBW to balls they would prob have been more forward to on thier own Indian decks

9/136
The Australian fast bowlers watching this would have been irked
Weve been trying to get these flat deck superstars on a bouncy pitch for years

Hopefully we get these decks for the rest of the series, and to see if the over inflated Indian batting averages drop

Laxman got clean bowled by a beauty by Steyn.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 8:58 pm
by spell_check
Not much of a surprise - India struggling in South Africa.

South Africa 1/111 with Smith just gone for 62. Only trail by 25.

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:22 pm
by brod
South Africa 1/151 (lead of 15)
Petersen 66
Amla 19
Harbhajan 1/51 in his last six overs

Re: 1st Test: South Africa vs India

PostPosted: Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:36 pm
by spell_check
I think Unadkat is the first teammate of Tendulkars' to be younger than the Little Masters Test career.

Unadkat is two years younger than his career, in fact.