by Booney » Mon Nov 08, 2010 8:38 am
by Booney » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:19 am
by Hondo » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:29 am
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:32 am
Booney wrote:With so much criticism of the current Australian squad I thought it was worth the punters in here picking our current second XI.
Now, we might not all agree with the first XI I have listed, but lets use it as a template.These guys in our best XI and our probable first Test line up.
Watson Hughes
Katich S.Marsh
Ponting Khawaja
Clark Ferguson
Hussey White
North McDonald
Haddin Paine
Hauritz Smith/ Doherty
Johnson Harris
Hilfenhaus Bollinger
Siddle George
If we use that as our basis for the first XI - Now go and select your second XI, might not be a very strong side at the moment.
by Lightning McQueen » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:33 am
Hondo wrote:I am not as expert on the state players as others on here but I'll have a go ...
Watson JACQUES
Katich HUGHES
Ponting KLINGER
Clark KHAWAJA
Hussey FERGUSON
North MACDONALD / SMITH / WHITE
Haddin PAINE
Hauritz DOHERTY
Johnson McKAY
Hilfenhaus BOLLINGER
Siddle. GEORGE
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:55 am
by Killa » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:20 am
by Hondo » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:24 am
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:33 am
by Killa » Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:51 am
CoverKing wrote:Krejza is just poo IMO.
And Starc in the second 11, I know it's your opinion but seriously![]()
I would be pretty suprised if he even makes NSWs shield side on Wednesday!
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:35 pm
Killa wrote:CoverKing wrote:Krejza is just poo IMO.
And Starc in the second 11, I know it's your opinion but seriously![]()
I would be pretty suprised if he even makes NSWs shield side on Wednesday!
Its about development. Australia A should go back when all players were under 25. In the game they had clarke, white, haddin, cleary, north, tait, cosgrove, doherty and etc. Australia had used these games as development team in tour games now these games can not be seen to lack of tour matches. I would look at starc for the first test of bollinger is strugling as his height and pace would be handy on a GABBA pitch.
by Rik E Boy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:38 pm
Booney wrote:Nobody willing to pick a second XI?
Might be a reflection of how hard the current job the selectors have....
by Rik E Boy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 12:39 pm
CoverKing wrote:Krejza is just poo IMO.
And Starc in the second 11, I know it's your opinion but seriously![]()
I would be pretty suprised if he even makes NSWs shield side on Wednesday!
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:21 pm
by Killa » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:25 pm
CoverKing wrote:Killa wrote:CoverKing wrote:Krejza is just poo IMO.
And Starc in the second 11, I know it's your opinion but seriously![]()
I would be pretty suprised if he even makes NSWs shield side on Wednesday!
Its about development. Australia A should go back when all players were under 25. In the game they had clarke, white, haddin, cleary, north, tait, cosgrove, doherty and etc. Australia had used these games as development team in tour games now these games can not be seen to lack of tour matches. I would look at starc for the first test of bollinger is strugling as his height and pace would be handy on a GABBA pitch.
I dont think Booney was talking about the side being a developing side. Its about the second best 11 in the country. Starc having played 10 games with only 25 wickets at 35 does not put him in a second best australian side. Mark Cameron would be ahead of him with 11 matches and 45 wickets at 27.
I understand he is promising and a future star, but to even consider him in your second best side in the 4 day game is outrageous
by Rik E Boy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:38 pm
CoverKing wrote:Starc does average 25 in his minimal games in FC cricket!
The shield game your mob would have Bollinger (is he fit), Clark, Cameron and Copeland all ahead of Starc IMO
by CoverKing » Mon Nov 08, 2010 1:41 pm
by smithy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:10 pm
CoverKing wrote:Guess we will have to wait to Wednesday but Copeland ahead of Starc IMO!
Will NSW will play four quicks and Smith? Or 3 quicks and 2 of smith/hauritz/okeefe? Try picking their best side!
by Rik E Boy » Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:20 pm
CoverKing wrote:Guess we will have to wait to Wednesday but Copeland ahead of Starc IMO!
Will NSW will play four quicks and Smith? Or 3 quicks and 2 of smith/hauritz/okeefe? Try picking their best side!
by brod » Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:11 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |