by Rik E Boy » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:50 pm
by gadj1976 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:27 pm
by heater31 » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:39 pm
by The Cadet » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:42 pm
by Media Park » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:06 pm
The Cadet wrote:You guys are a joke. You have to pick your best side when it means representing your country. Not every player is the same, there all different. Brad Hodge is known to speak his mind too much when asked questions by the media concerning his non selection for his country. Who cares what he says, at the end of the day, If he's in the best eleven then he should be picked. I hate how today players have to say the right thing, even if they dont agree.
I cant belive you can not pick a guy when he is clearly dominating the State scene and has done so for the last 10 years for saying the wrong thing to the media.
I would of thought going on Rebel tours to South Africa and turning your back on your country would of been more of a crime than what Hodge has done. Players like Allderman, Rackermann and Hohns should of never been allowed to represent there country again but they did, and Hohns became a selector, that never sat well with me.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by westcoastpanther » Tue Oct 26, 2010 11:17 am
by Rik E Boy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:29 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:I agree Cadet, he is merely saying what we all think, the selectors are a gutless bunch of tools. When the same Test side is picked for the ashes and we get rolled everyone one here will be bagging them yet certain posters bag Hodge for doing the same. At least Hodgey gets heard!!
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:35 pm
The Cadet wrote: I hate how today players have to say the right thing, even if they dont agree.
by westcoastpanther » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:41 pm
Phantom Gossiper wrote:The Cadet wrote: I hate how today players have to say the right thing, even if they dont agree.
I agree, however being a professional sportsman is now a career and with all jobs are obligations and criteria and having been around for so long and having been part of the aussie side at one stage he would know this and really its just stupid on his behalf opening his mouth, let his bat do the talking and the media take it from there, he doesnt need to say a word.
by sherminator » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:47 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Oct 26, 2010 12:49 pm
westcoastpanther wrote:Disagree, his bat has done the talking for the last 12 months and he hasn't looked like getting promoted. Selectors prefer to give games to Steve Smith who is an ok batter who bowls a bit.
Off track but the ODI in India had Hauritz who was the supposed bowler and Smith the batter at 6. I assume Hauritz was to bowl the spin so why not pick a class batsmen like Hodge or Ferguson and leave Smith out altogether, or does that make too much sense??
by smithy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:57 pm
by Gozu » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:15 pm
smithy wrote:Why select a 36 year old with a ODI average of 30 ?
His only century was against The Netherlands.
Take out that innings and he has an average of 25 from 24 matches.
Not good enough for someone mainly batting 3,4,5
IMO He's another Hookes type player.
A million $$$$ at domestic level but just couldn't take the opportunities at a higher level.
by Pidge » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:37 pm
Gozu wrote:smithy wrote:Why select a 36 year old with a ODI average of 30 ?
His only century was against The Netherlands.
Take out that innings and he has an average of 25 from 24 matches.
Not good enough for someone mainly batting 3,4,5
IMO He's another Hookes type player.
A million $$$$ at domestic level but just couldn't take the opportunities at a higher level.
Exactly, people can make an argument for his inclusion in the Test side but he's no one-day player.
by Gozu » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:47 pm
Pidge wrote:Gozu wrote:smithy wrote:Why select a 36 year old with a ODI average of 30 ?
His only century was against The Netherlands.
Take out that innings and he has an average of 25 from 24 matches.
Not good enough for someone mainly batting 3,4,5
IMO He's another Hookes type player.
A million $$$$ at domestic level but just couldn't take the opportunities at a higher level.
Exactly, people can make an argument for his inclusion in the Test side but he's no one-day player.
Couldn't agree more. He's not in good enough form. Was it 7 or 8 Centuries in his last 15 or so innings? That's just terrible for a 3,4,5 batsman.
by Jim05 » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:54 pm
by cripple » Tue Oct 26, 2010 3:59 pm
by smithy » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:13 pm
Pidge wrote:Gozu wrote:smithy wrote:Why select a 36 year old with a ODI average of 30 ?
His only century was against The Netherlands.
Take out that innings and he has an average of 25 from 24 matches.
Not good enough for someone mainly batting 3,4,5
IMO He's another Hookes type player.
A million $$$$ at domestic level but just couldn't take the opportunities at a higher level.
Exactly, people can make an argument for his inclusion in the Test side but he's no one-day player.
Couldn't agree more. He's not in good enough form. Was it 7 or 8 Centuries in his last 15 or so innings? That's just terrible for a 3,4,5 batsman.
by Media Park » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:23 pm
smithy wrote:Pidge wrote:Gozu wrote:smithy wrote:Why select a 36 year old with a ODI average of 30 ?
His only century was against The Netherlands.
Take out that innings and he has an average of 25 from 24 matches.
Not good enough for someone mainly batting 3,4,5
IMO He's another Hookes type player.
A million $$$$ at domestic level but just couldn't take the opportunities at a higher level.
Exactly, people can make an argument for his inclusion in the Test side but he's no one-day player.
Couldn't agree more. He's not in good enough form. Was it 7 or 8 Centuries in his last 15 or so innings? That's just terrible for a 3,4,5 batsman.
You obviously didn't read anything you quoted.
Noone is questioning his form.
The issue above was if it's worth selecting a 36 year old with a poor ODI record.
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by piccachu » Tue Oct 26, 2010 4:43 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |