by rod_rooster » Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:09 pm
by shoe boy » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:41 am
rod_rooster wrote:The cricinfo commentary team just posted the following email that was sent to them. How very well it sums things up:
"Was at Lord's yesterday and what a total pleasure it was," says Chris Phillips. "Five slips, bowling to attack and not just contain, fine skills all round, white clothes, no advertising on the ground and a crowd of cricket fans, not drunks dressed as Elvis. This MUST survive. It will always attract a good crowd, at least in England, and one day the rest of the world will recover its senses and remember what makes cricket such a compelling and beautiful game."
by interested observer » Thu Jul 15, 2010 10:53 am
shoe boy wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The cricinfo commentary team just posted the following email that was sent to them. How very well it sums things up:
"Was at Lord's yesterday and what a total pleasure it was," says Chris Phillips. "Five slips, bowling to attack and not just contain, fine skills all round, white clothes, no advertising on the ground and a crowd of cricket fans, not drunks dressed as Elvis. This MUST survive. It will always attract a good crowd, at least in England, and one day the rest of the world will recover its senses and remember what makes cricket such a compelling and beautiful game."
Agree![]()
by The Dark Knight » Thu Jul 15, 2010 5:54 pm
rod_rooster wrote:The cricinfo commentary team just posted the following email that was sent to them. How very well it sums things up:
"Was at Lord's yesterday and what a total pleasure it was," says Chris Phillips. "Five slips, bowling to attack and not just contain, fine skills all round, white clothes, no advertising on the ground and a crowd of cricket fans, not drunks dressed as Elvis. This MUST survive. It will always attract a good crowd, at least in England, and one day the rest of the world will recover its senses and remember what makes cricket such a compelling and beautiful game."
by Dogwatcher » Thu Jul 15, 2010 8:24 pm
by The Dark Knight » Fri Jul 16, 2010 7:00 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:As a traditionalist I love it. This is the first cricket of the England tour I've watched.
But...always attract crowds? I'm not so sure...I guess it depends what you mean by 'crowds'.
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:08 pm
rod_rooster wrote:The cricinfo commentary team just posted the following email that was sent to them. How very well it sums things up:
"Was at Lord's yesterday and what a total pleasure it was," says Chris Phillips. "Five slips, bowling to attack and not just contain, fine skills all round, white clothes, no advertising on the ground and a crowd of cricket fans, not drunks dressed as Elvis. This MUST survive. It will always attract a good crowd, at least in England, and one day the rest of the world will recover its senses and remember what makes cricket such a compelling and beautiful game."
by Dogwatcher » Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:53 pm
The Dark Knight wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:As a traditionalist I love it. This is the first cricket of the England tour I've watched.
But...always attract crowds? I'm not so sure...I guess it depends what you mean by 'crowds'.
Just from watching the cricket last night, I though the crowd was pretty good considering it's a neutral test.
by RoosterMarty » Sat Jul 17, 2010 6:59 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:rod_rooster wrote:The cricinfo commentary team just posted the following email that was sent to them. How very well it sums things up:
"Was at Lord's yesterday and what a total pleasure it was," says Chris Phillips. "Five slips, bowling to attack and not just contain, fine skills all round, white clothes, no advertising on the ground and a crowd of cricket fans, not drunks dressed as Elvis. This MUST survive. It will always attract a good crowd, at least in England, and one day the rest of the world will recover its senses and remember what makes cricket such a compelling and beautiful game."
Um, wasn't teeball invented in England?
regards,
REB
by The Dark Knight » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:10 am
Dogwatcher wrote:The Dark Knight wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:As a traditionalist I love it. This is the first cricket of the England tour I've watched.
But...always attract crowds? I'm not so sure...I guess it depends what you mean by 'crowds'.
Just from watching the cricket last night, I though the crowd was pretty good considering it's a neutral test.
London has a large Pakistani population, where are they? I thought the crowd might be larger given the population.
However, look at the crowds across Australia this summer just gone, I know it wasn't a premium contest, but...
I'll look forward to this summer though, big crowds and lots of pasty Poms visiting paradise, boosting the crowds.
by Dogwatcher » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:16 am
by The Dark Knight » Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:23 am
IMO it depends on how good the quality of cricket is and if Australia is challenged well enough.Dogwatcher wrote:No doubt. But what about the summers between England tours?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |